• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于自动生成社交媒体帖子的生成式人工智能平台:一项横断面研究和随机评估。

Generative Artificial Intelligence Platform for Automating Social Media Posts From Urology Journal Articles: A Cross-Sectional Study and Randomized Assessment.

机构信息

USC Institute of Urology and Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Artificial Intelligence Center (UroAI) at USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

J Urol. 2024 Dec;212(6):873-881. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004199. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004199
PMID:39141845
Abstract

PURPOSE

This cross-sectional study assessed a generative artificial intelligence platform to automate the creation of accurate, appropriate, and compelling social media (SoMe) posts from urological journal articles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred SoMe posts from the top 3 journals in urology X (formerly Twitter) profiles were collected from August 2022 to October 2023. A freeware generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) tool was developed to autogenerate SoMe posts, which included title summarization, key findings, pertinent emojis, hashtags, and digital object identifier links to the article. Three physicians independently evaluated GPT-generated posts for achieving tetrafecta of accuracy and appropriateness criteria. Fifteen scenarios were created from 5 randomly selected posts from each journal. Each scenario contained both the original and the GPT-generated post for the same article. Five questions were formulated to investigate the posts' likability, shareability, engagement, understandability, and comprehensiveness. The paired posts were then randomized and presented to blinded academic authors and general public through Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) responders for preference evaluation.

RESULTS

Median time for post autogeneration was 10.2 seconds (interquartile range 8.5-12.5). Of the 150 rated GPT-generated posts, 115 (76.6%) met the correctness tetrafecta: 144 (96%) accurately summarized the title, 147 (98%) accurately presented the articles' main findings, 131 (87.3%) appropriately used emojis, and 138 (92%) appropriately used hashtags. A total of 258 academic urologists and 493 AMT responders answered the surveys, wherein the GPT-generated posts consistently outperformed the original journals' posts for both academicians and AMT responders ( < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Generative artificial intelligence can automate the creation of SoMe posts from urology journal abstracts that are both accurate and preferable by the academic community and general public.

摘要

目的

本横断面研究评估了一种生成式人工智能平台,以从泌尿科期刊文章中自动创建准确、恰当且引人入胜的社交媒体 (SoMe) 帖子。

材料和方法

从 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 10 月,从泌尿科 X(前 Twitter)档案的前 3 本期刊中收集了 100 篇 SoMe 帖子。开发了一个免费的生成式预训练转换器 (GPT) 工具来自动生成 SoMe 帖子,其中包括标题总结、主要发现、相关表情符号、话题标签和文章的数字对象标识符链接。三位医生独立评估了 GPT 生成的帖子是否符合准确性和恰当性标准的四件套。从每个期刊中随机选择 5 个帖子创建了 15 个场景。每个场景都包含同一篇文章的原始帖子和 GPT 生成的帖子。提出了 5 个问题来调查帖子的受欢迎程度、可分享性、参与度、理解度和全面性。然后对配对帖子进行随机化,并通过亚马逊机械土耳其人 (AMT) 响应者向盲目的学术作者和公众展示,以进行偏好评估。

结果

帖子自动生成的中位数时间为 10.2 秒(四分位距 8.5-12.5)。在 150 个评价的 GPT 生成的帖子中,有 115 个(76.6%)符合正确性四件套标准:144 个(96%)准确地总结了标题,147 个(98%)准确地呈现了文章的主要发现,131 个(87.3%)恰当地使用了表情符号,138 个(92%)恰当地使用了话题标签。共有 258 名学术泌尿科医生和 493 名 AMT 响应者回答了调查,其中 GPT 生成的帖子在学术社区和普通公众中都比原始期刊的帖子表现更好(<0.05)。

结论

生成式人工智能可以从泌尿科期刊摘要中自动创建准确且受学术界和普通公众欢迎的社交媒体帖子。

相似文献

1
Generative Artificial Intelligence Platform for Automating Social Media Posts From Urology Journal Articles: A Cross-Sectional Study and Randomized Assessment.用于自动生成社交媒体帖子的生成式人工智能平台:一项横断面研究和随机评估。
J Urol. 2024 Dec;212(6):873-881. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004199. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Human vs machine: identifying ChatGPT-generated abstracts in Gynecology and Urogynecology.人机之争:在妇科和泌尿外科学中识别 ChatGPT 生成的摘要。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):276.e1-276.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.045. Epub 2024 May 6.
3
Top 100 Urology Influencers on Twitter: Is Social Media Influence Associated with Academic Impact?Twitter上排名前100的泌尿外科有影响力的人:社交媒体影响力与学术影响力有关联吗?
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Mar;9(2):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.09.009. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
4
Accuracy, readability, and understandability of large language models for prostate cancer information to the public.大语言模型向公众提供前列腺癌信息的准确性、可读性和可理解性。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 May 14. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00826-y.
5
Association Between Twitter Reception at a National Urology Conference and Future Publication Status.推特在全国泌尿科会议上的反馈与未来的出版状况之间的关联。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Jan;7(1):214-220. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 15.
6
Assessing the Role of the Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) in Alzheimer's Disease Management: Comparative Study of Neurologist- and Artificial Intelligence-Generated Responses.评估生成式预训练转换器(GPT)在阿尔茨海默病管理中的作用:神经科医生和人工智能生成的回复的对比研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 31;26:e51095. doi: 10.2196/51095.
7
Bridging the Gap Between Urological Research and Patient Understanding: The Role of Large Language Models in Automated Generation of Layperson's Summaries.弥合泌尿科研究与患者理解之间的差距:大型语言模型在生成非专业人士摘要方面的作用。
Urol Pract. 2023 Sep;10(5):436-443. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000428. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
8
ChatGPT and generative AI in urology and surgery-A narrative review.ChatGPT与生成式人工智能在泌尿外科及外科领域的叙述性综述
BJUI Compass. 2024 Jul 25;5(9):813-821. doi: 10.1002/bco2.390. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on standardized urology knowledge assessment items in the United States: a descriptive study.GPT-3.5 和 GPT-4 在标准化美国泌尿科知识评估项目中的表现:一项描述性研究。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:17. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.17. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
10
Publishers' and journals' instructions to authors on use of generative artificial intelligence in academic and scientific publishing: bibliometric analysis.出版商和期刊社关于在学术和科学出版中使用生成式人工智能的作者指南:文献计量分析。
BMJ. 2024 Jan 31;384:e077192. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077192.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the gap: the role of large language model refinement in readability in urology research.弥合差距:大语言模型优化在泌尿外科研究可读性中的作用
BJU Int. 2025 May 19;136(3):356-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.16774.