• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Twitter上排名前100的泌尿外科有影响力的人:社交媒体影响力与学术影响力有关联吗?

Top 100 Urology Influencers on Twitter: Is Social Media Influence Associated with Academic Impact?

作者信息

Corsi Nicholas, Nguyen David-Dan, Butaney Mohit, Majdalany Sami E, Corsi Matthew P, Malchow Taylor, Piontkowski Austin J, Trinh Quoc-Dien, Loeb Stacy, Abdollah Firas

机构信息

Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA; Vattikuti Center for Outcomes, Research, Analytics, and Evaluation, Detroit, MI, USA.

Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Mar;9(2):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.09.009. Epub 2022 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2022.09.009
PMID:36210295
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social media use in medicine has exploded, with uptake by most physicians and patients. There is a risk of dissemination of inaccurate information about urological conditions on social media. Physicians, as key opinion leaders, must play a role in sharing evidence-based information through social media.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and describe the top 100 urology influencers on the Twitter social media platform and to correlate Twitter influence with academic impact in urology.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Twitter influence scores for the search topic "urology" were collected in April 2022 using published methodology. The top 100 personal accounts with the highest computed scores were linked to individuals' names, all-time h index, geographic location, specialty, attributed sex, and board certification status in this cross-sectional study.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We examined the correlation between influence rank and h index.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Of the top 100 Twitter influencers on the topic of urology, the majority are from the USA (64%), male (85%), and practicing urologists (91%). Some 93% of US urology influencers are board-certified. Only 22 of the 50 US states are represented. The second most frequent country is the UK, with ten urology influencers. The median all-time h index is 42 (interquartile range 28.25-58). There is a weak positive correlation between influence rank and h index (r = 0.23; p = 0.02). Limitations of the study include the inability to validate the accuracy of the proprietary ranking algorithm and investigation of just one social media platform.

CONCLUSIONS

The top Twitter influencers in urology are mostly board-certified US urologists. Collectively, influencers have a relatively greater academic impact in comparison to the average urologist, although there is a weak positive correlation between Twitter influence and h index among top Twitter influencers.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Given the explosion of medical information on Twitter, we report the personal accounts with the greatest impact for the topic of "urology". We found that most urology influencers on Twitter are US board-certified urologists with a strong research history.

摘要

背景

医学领域对社交媒体的使用呈爆发式增长,大多数医生和患者都在使用。社交媒体上存在传播有关泌尿系统疾病不准确信息的风险。作为关键意见领袖,医生必须在通过社交媒体分享循证信息方面发挥作用。

目的

识别并描述推特社交媒体平台上排名前100的泌尿外科有影响力的人,并将推特影响力与泌尿外科的学术影响力相关联。

设计、背景和参与者:2022年4月,采用已发表的方法收集搜索主题“泌尿外科”的推特影响力得分。在这项横断面研究中,计算得分最高的前100个个人账户与个人姓名、终身h指数、地理位置、专业、性别归属和委员会认证状态相关联。

结局测量和统计分析

我们研究了影响力排名与h指数之间的相关性。

结果与局限性

在推特上排名前100的泌尿外科有影响力的人中,大多数来自美国(64%),男性(85%),并且是执业泌尿外科医生(91%)。约93%的美国泌尿外科有影响力的人获得了委员会认证。美国50个州中只有22个州有代表。第二常见的国家是英国,有10位泌尿外科有影响力的人。终身h指数的中位数为42(四分位间距28.25 - 58)。影响力排名与h指数之间存在弱正相关(r = 0.23;p = 0.02)。该研究的局限性包括无法验证专有排名算法的准确性,并且仅调查了一个社交媒体平台。

结论

推特上排名前的泌尿外科有影响力的人大多是获得委员会认证的美国泌尿外科医生。总体而言,与普通泌尿外科医生相比,有影响力的人具有相对更大的学术影响力,尽管在推特上排名前的有影响力的人中,推特影响力与h指数之间存在弱正相关。

患者总结

鉴于推特上医学信息的爆炸式增长,我们报告了“泌尿外科”主题中影响最大的个人账户。我们发现推特上大多数泌尿外科有影响力的人是具有强大研究历史的美国委员会认证的泌尿外科医生。

相似文献

1
Top 100 Urology Influencers on Twitter: Is Social Media Influence Associated with Academic Impact?Twitter上排名前100的泌尿外科有影响力的人:社交媒体影响力与学术影响力有关联吗?
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Mar;9(2):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.09.009. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
2
Who should you be following? The top 100 social media influencers in orthopaedic surgery.你应该关注谁?骨科手术领域的前100名社交媒体有影响力的人。
World J Orthop. 2019 Sep 18;10(9):327-338. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i9.327.
3
The Top 100 Social Media Influencers in Plastic Surgery on Twitter: Who Should You Be Following?推特上整形手术领域的前100名社交媒体有影响力的人:你应该关注谁?
Aesthet Surg J. 2018 Jul 13;38(8):913-917. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy024.
4
#Botox 101: Subgroup Analysis of Twitter's Top 101 Neurotoxin Influencers.肉毒素 101:对推特排名前 101 的神经毒素影响者的亚组分析。
Dermatol Surg. 2021 Nov 1;47(11):1474-1479. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003192.
5
The top 100 Twitter influencers in cardiology.心脏病学领域推特上最具影响力的100人。
AIMS Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;8(4):743-753. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021058. eCollection 2021.
6
#OtoTwitter: The Top 75 Twitter Influencers in Otolaryngology and Association With Academic Impact.#耳科推特:耳鼻喉科领域最具影响力的75位推特用户及其与学术影响力的关联
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jun;170(6):1676-1683. doi: 10.1002/ohn.721. Epub 2024 Mar 17.
7
Characteristics of General Surgery Social Media Influencers on Twitter.社交媒体上普通外科医生大 V 的特征。
Am Surg. 2021 Mar;87(3):492-498. doi: 10.1177/0003134820951427. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
8
Inflammatory Bowel Disease and X (Formerly Twitter) Influencers: Who Are They and What Do They Say?炎症性肠病与X(原推特)有影响力的人:他们是谁以及他们说了什么?
Cureus. 2023 Oct 23;15(10):e47536. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47536. eCollection 2023 Oct.
9
To Bot or Not? Challenging the Top Social Media Influencers in #PlasticSurgery.是否选择 Bot?挑战社交媒体 #整形 领域的顶级意见领袖。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1):337-343. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005103.
10
Twitter and academic Urology in the United States and Canada: a comprehensive assessment of the Twitterverse in 2019.推特与美加泌尿科医学:2019 年推特全景剖析
BJU Int. 2020 Jan;125(1):173-181. doi: 10.1111/bju.14920. Epub 2019 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Media in Urologic Healthcare: Transforming Treatment, Management, and Online Medical Communication.泌尿外科医疗中的社交媒体:变革治疗、管理及在线医疗沟通
Int Neurourol J. 2025 Jun;29(2):71-80. doi: 10.5213/inj.2550064.032. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
Is oral and maxillofacial surgery lagging behind other specialties on X?口腔颌面外科在X方面是否落后于其他专科?
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Mar 5;29(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01359-x.
3
Urologists and social media: pitfalls and perils and what to think about before hitting 'send'.
泌尿外科医生与社交媒体:陷阱、风险以及发送前的思考要点
BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):390-398. doi: 10.1111/bju.16636. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
4
Evaluating HPV Vaccination-Related Content on a Burgeoning Social Media Platform: Insufficient Quality of TikTok.评估一个新兴社交媒体平台上与HPV疫苗接种相关的内容:TikTok质量欠佳。
OTO Open. 2024 Dec 15;8(4):e70052. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70052. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
5
Social media and urology: The good, the bad and the ugly.社交媒体与泌尿外科学:有好有坏有丑。
Urologia. 2024 Nov;91(4):659-664. doi: 10.1177/03915603241273885. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
6
[Large language models in science].[科学中的大语言模型]
Urologie. 2024 Sep;63(9):860-866. doi: 10.1007/s00120-024-02396-2. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
7
Privacy Concerns About Sharing General and Specific Health Information on Twitter: Quantitative Study.关于在推特上分享一般和特定健康信息的隐私担忧:定量研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 12;8:e45573. doi: 10.2196/45573.