Suppr超能文献

推动腹腔镜胆总管探查术的发展:确定前进道路上的障碍。

Moving the needle for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: defining obstacles for the path forward.

机构信息

Washington University in St. Louis, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 4901 Forest Park Avenue, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston Salem, NC, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6753-6761. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11146-6. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed very commonly but laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is performed infrequently. We aimed to determine the most significant barriers to performing LCBDE and to identify the highest yield interventions to facilitate adoption.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

A national survey was designed by content experts, who regularly perform LCBDE. The survey was distributed by email to the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma memberships. Non-U.S. surgeon responses were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results.

RESULTS

Seven hundred twenty six practicing surgeons responded to the survey, 543 of which were US surgeons who perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Only 27% of respondents preferred to manage choledocholithiasis with LCBDE. Their technique of choice was choledochoscopy (70%). Despite this, 36% of surgeons did not have access to a choledochoscope or were unsure if they did. Seventy percent of surgeons who performed LCBDE did not have supplies readily available in a central stocking location. Only 8.5% of surgeons agreed that routine LCBDE would impact their referral relationship with gastroenterology. About half the respondents (47%) considered LCBDE worth the time, but only 25% knew about reimbursement for the procedure. Almost all (85%) of surgeons understood that LCBDE results in shorter length of stay compared to ERCP.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a quarter of the surgeons performing cholecystectomy perform LCBDE. Multiple barriers contribute to low LCBDE utilization. Increasing availability of appropriate equipment, a dedicated supply cart, and teaching fluoroscopic LCBDE interventions may address limitations and increase adoption. These efforts may also increase efficiency, minimizing perceived time and skill restraints. Although many surgeons understand LCBDE decreases length of stay, they are unaware of surgeon-specific LCBDE financial benefits. Systematically addressing these barriers may increase LCBDE adoption, improve patient care, and decrease healthcare costs.

摘要

简介

腹腔镜胆囊切除术的应用非常普遍,但腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)的应用却很少。我们旨在确定实施 LCBDE 的最主要障碍,并确定最高效的干预措施以促进其应用。

方法和程序

由经常进行 LCBDE 的内容专家设计了一项全国性调查。该调查通过电子邮件分发给美国胃肠内镜外科学会和美国创伤外科学会的成员。非美国外科医生的回复被排除在外。使用描述性统计来分析结果。

结果

726 名执业外科医生对该调查做出了回应,其中 543 名是在美国进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的外科医生。只有 27%的受访者更愿意采用 LCBDE 来治疗胆总管结石。他们首选的技术是胆管镜检查(70%)。尽管如此,仍有 36%的外科医生没有胆道镜或不确定是否有胆道镜。70%的进行 LCBDE 的外科医生没有将用品放在中央库存位置以备随时取用。只有 8.5%的外科医生同意常规 LCBDE 会影响他们与胃肠病学的转介关系。约一半的受访者(47%)认为 LCBDE 值得花费时间,但只有 25%的人知道该手术的报销情况。几乎所有(85%)的外科医生都明白 LCBDE 与 ERCP 相比可缩短住院时间。

结论

只有四分之一的进行胆囊切除术的外科医生会进行 LCBDE。多种障碍导致 LCBDE 的利用率较低。增加合适设备的可用性、专用供应推车和教学透视 LCBDE 干预措施可能会解决限制并增加应用。这些努力还可能提高效率,最大限度地减少感知到的时间和技能限制。尽管许多外科医生了解 LCBDE 可缩短住院时间,但他们并不知道外科医生特定的 LCBDE 财务收益。系统地解决这些障碍可能会增加 LCBDE 的应用,改善患者的护理,并降低医疗保健成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验