• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人工智能的乳腺癌风险分层解决方案在常规数字化病理图像中的验证。

Validation of an AI-based solution for breast cancer risk stratification using routine digital histopathology images.

机构信息

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Stratipath AB, Solna, Sweden.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Aug 14;26(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01879-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13058-024-01879-6
PMID:39143539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11323658/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stratipath Breast is a CE-IVD marked artificial intelligence-based solution for prognostic risk stratification of breast cancer patients into high- and low-risk groups, using haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histopathology whole slide images (WSIs). In this validation study, we assessed the prognostic performance of Stratipath Breast in two independent breast cancer cohorts.

METHODS

This retrospective multi-site validation study included 2719 patients with primary breast cancer from two Swedish hospitals. The Stratipath Breast tool was applied to stratify patients based on digitised WSIs of the diagnostic H&E-stained tissue sections from surgically resected tumours. The prognostic performance was evaluated using time-to-event analysis by multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards analysis with progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

In the clinically relevant oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patient subgroup, the estimated hazard ratio (HR) associated with PFS between low- and high-risk groups was 2.76 (95% CI: 1.63-4.66, p-value < 0.001) after adjusting for established risk factors. In the ER+/HER2- Nottingham histological grade (NHG) 2 subgroup, the HR was 2.20 (95% CI: 1.22-3.98, p-value = 0.009) between low- and high-risk groups.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate an independent prognostic value of Stratipath Breast among all breast cancer patients, as well as in the clinically relevant ER+/HER2- subgroup and the NHG2/ER+/HER2- subgroup. Improved risk stratification of intermediate-risk ER+/HER2- breast cancers provides information relevant for treatment decisions of adjuvant chemotherapy and has the potential to reduce both under- and overtreatment. Image-based risk stratification provides the added benefit of short lead times and substantially lower cost compared to molecular diagnostics and therefore has the potential to reach broader patient groups.

摘要

背景

Stratipath Breast 是一种基于 CE-IVD 的人工智能解决方案,用于将乳腺癌患者的预后风险分为高风险和低风险组,使用苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色的组织学全切片图像(WSI)。在这项验证研究中,我们在两个独立的乳腺癌队列中评估了 Stratipath Breast 的预后性能。

方法

这是一项回顾性多中心验证研究,纳入了来自瑞典两家医院的 2719 名原发性乳腺癌患者。Stratipath Breast 工具应用于基于手术切除肿瘤的诊断性 H&E 染色组织切片的数字化 WSI 对患者进行分层。预后性能通过多变量 Cox 比例风险分析进行时间事件分析,以无进展生存期(PFS)作为主要终点。

结果

在具有临床意义的雌激素受体(ER)阳性/人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阴性患者亚组中,在调整了既定风险因素后,低风险组和高风险组之间与 PFS 相关的估计风险比(HR)为 2.76(95%CI:1.63-4.66,p 值<0.001)。在 ER+/HER2-诺丁汉组织学分级(NHG)2 亚组中,低风险组和高风险组之间的 HR 为 2.20(95%CI:1.22-3.98,p 值=0.009)。

结论

结果表明 Stratipath Breast 在所有乳腺癌患者中具有独立的预后价值,在具有临床意义的 ER+/HER2-亚组和 NHG2/ER+/HER2-亚组中也是如此。改善中间风险 ER+/HER2-乳腺癌的风险分层为辅助化疗的治疗决策提供了相关信息,并有可能减少过度治疗和治疗不足。与分子诊断相比,基于图像的风险分层具有较短的前置时间和显著降低的成本的额外优势,因此有可能惠及更广泛的患者群体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b252/11323658/9b41ae7760f9/13058_2024_1879_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b252/11323658/c27b3f23bb06/13058_2024_1879_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b252/11323658/376222d97ea9/13058_2024_1879_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b252/11323658/ffbe7c2fcadb/13058_2024_1879_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b252/11323658/9b41ae7760f9/13058_2024_1879_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b252/11323658/c27b3f23bb06/13058_2024_1879_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b252/11323658/376222d97ea9/13058_2024_1879_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b252/11323658/ffbe7c2fcadb/13058_2024_1879_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b252/11323658/9b41ae7760f9/13058_2024_1879_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of an AI-based solution for breast cancer risk stratification using routine digital histopathology images.基于人工智能的乳腺癌风险分层解决方案在常规数字化病理图像中的验证。
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Aug 14;26(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01879-6.
2
Improved breast cancer histological grading using deep learning.深度学习在乳腺癌组织学分级中的应用。
Ann Oncol. 2022 Jan;33(1):89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
3
Clinical evaluation of deep learning-based risk profiling in breast cancer histopathology and comparison to an established multigene assay.深度学习在乳腺癌组织病理学中的风险分析的临床评估,并与已建立的多基因检测方法进行比较。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jul;206(1):163-175. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07303-z. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
4
Development and prognostic validation of a three-level NHG-like deep learning-based model for histological grading of breast cancer.基于深度学习的三级类似NHG乳腺癌组织学分级模型的开发与预后验证
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Jan 29;26(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01770-4.
5
Transcriptional intra-tumour heterogeneity predicted by deep learning in routine breast histopathology slides provides independent prognostic information.深度学习预测常规乳腺组织病理切片中的肿瘤内转录异质性提供独立的预后信息。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Sep;191:112953. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112953. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
6
Deep learning-based risk stratification of preoperative breast biopsies using digital whole slide images.基于深度学习的术前乳腺活检数字全切片图像风险分层。
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Jun 3;26(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01840-7.
7
Augmented interpretation of HER2, ER, and PR in breast cancer by artificial intelligence analyzer: enhancing interobserver agreement through a reader study of 201 cases.人工智能分析器增强乳腺癌中 HER2、ER 和 PR 的解读:通过对 201 例病例的读片研究提高观察者间一致性。
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Feb 23;26(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01784-y.
8
Spatial distributions of CD8 and Ki67 cells in the tumor microenvironment independently predict breast cancer-specific survival in patients with ER+HER2- and triple-negative breast carcinoma.肿瘤微环境中 CD8 和 Ki67 细胞的空间分布独立预测 ER+/HER2- 和三阴性乳腺癌患者的乳腺癌特异性生存。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 22;19(11):e0314364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314364. eCollection 2024.
9
Prognostic stratification of oestrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative lymph node-negative class of breast cancer.雌激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性、淋巴结阴性乳腺癌的预后分层
Histopathology. 2017 Mar;70(4):622-631. doi: 10.1111/his.13108. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
10
Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes as a prognostic and tamoxifen predictive marker in premenopausal breast cancer: data from a randomised trial with long-term follow-up.肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞作为绝经前乳腺癌的预后和他莫昔芬预测标志物:来自一项具有长期随访的随机试验的数据。
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Dec 23;22(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01364-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Global scoring method of Ki67 immunohistochemistry in breast cancer demonstrates improved concordance using real-world multi-institutional data.乳腺癌中Ki67免疫组化的全球评分方法利用真实世界多机构数据显示出更高的一致性。
Breast Cancer Res. 2025 Sep 2;27(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13058-025-02114-6.
2
External validation of precisebreast, a digital prognostic test for predicting breast cancer recurrence, in an early-stage cohort from the Netherlands.PreciseBreast(一种用于预测乳腺癌复发的数字预后测试)在荷兰一个早期队列中的外部验证。
Breast Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 20;27(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13058-025-02104-8.
3
Artificial Intelligence-Based Pathology to Assist Prediction of Neoadjuvant Therapy Responses for Breast Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Improved breast cancer histological grading using deep learning.深度学习在乳腺癌组织学分级中的应用。
Ann Oncol. 2022 Jan;33(1):89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
2
Variability in Breast Cancer Biomarker Assessment and the Effect on Oncological Treatment Decisions: A Nationwide 5-Year Population-Based Study.乳腺癌生物标志物评估的变异性及其对肿瘤治疗决策的影响:一项基于全国5年人口的研究
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 9;13(5):1166. doi: 10.3390/cancers13051166.
3
Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: a multi-institution study of interobserver variation using virtual microscopy.
基于人工智能的病理学辅助预测乳腺癌新辅助治疗反应
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(15):e71132. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71132.
乳腺癌的组织学分级:使用虚拟显微镜的多机构观察者间变异研究。
Mod Pathol. 2021 Apr;34(4):701-709. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-00698-2. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
4
Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.人工智能在前列腺癌活检中的诊断和分级:一项基于人群的诊断研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):222-232. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30738-7. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
5
Cross comparison and prognostic assessment of breast cancer multigene signatures in a large population-based contemporary clinical series.在一个大型基于人群的当代临床系列中对乳腺癌多基因标志物进行的交叉比较和预后评估。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 21;9(1):12184. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48570-x.
6
Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images.基于全切片图像的弱监督深度学习的临床级计算病理学。
Nat Med. 2019 Aug;25(8):1301-1309. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0508-1. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
7
Clinical and Genomic Risk to Guide the Use of Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer.临床和基因组风险指导乳腺癌辅助治疗的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 20;380(25):2395-2405. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904819. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
8
Significant inter- and intra-laboratory variation in grading of invasive breast cancer: A nationwide study of 33,043 patients in the Netherlands.浸润性乳腺癌分级的显著实验室间和实验室内差异:荷兰全国范围内对 33043 例患者的研究。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;146(3):769-780. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32330. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
9
Identification and clinical validation of a multigene assay that interrogates the biology of cancer stem cells and predicts metastasis in breast cancer: A retrospective consecutive study.鉴定和临床验证一种多基因检测方法,该方法可研究癌症干细胞的生物学特性并预测乳腺癌的转移:一项回顾性连续研究。
EBioMedicine. 2019 Apr;42:352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.02.036. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
10
Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning.基于深度学习的非小细胞肺癌组织病理学图像分类和突变预测。
Nat Med. 2018 Oct;24(10):1559-1567. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0177-5. Epub 2018 Sep 17.