BACKGROUND

The contrasted-enhanced ultrasound thyroid imaging reporting and data system (CEUS TI-RADS) is the first international risk stratification system for thyroid nodules based on conventional ultrasound (US) and CEUS. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS TI-RADS for benign and malignant thyroid nodules and to assess the related interobserver agreement.

METHODS

The study recruited 433 patients who underwent thyroid US and CEUS between January 2019 and June 2023 at the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University. A retrospective analysis of 467 thyroid nodules confirmed by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and/or surgery was performed. Further, a CEUS TI-RADS classification was assigned to each thyroid nodule based on the CEUS TI-RADS scoring criteria for the US and CEUS features of the nodule. The nodules were grouped based on their sizes as follows: size ≤1 cm, group A; size >1 and ≤4 cm, group B; and size >4 cm, group C. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze independent risk factors for malignant thyroid nodules. Pathological assessment was the reference standard for establishing the sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), accuracy (ACC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of CEUS TI-RADS in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules. The area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the diagnostic efficacy of the scoring system in predicting malignancy in three groups of nodules. The intragroup correlation coefficient (ICC) was adopted to assess the interobserver agreement of the CEUS TI-RADS score.

RESULTS

Out of the 467 thyroid nodules, 262 were malignant and 205 were benign. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the independent risk factors for malignant thyroid nodules included punctate echogenic foci (P<0.001), taller-than-wide shape (P=0.015), extrathyroidal invasion (P=0.020), irregular margins/lobulation (P=0.036), hypoechoicity on US (P=0.038), and hypoenhancement on CEUS (P<0.001). The AUC for the CEUS TI-RADS in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules was 0.898 for all nodules, 0.795 for group A, 0.949 for group B, and 0.801 for group C, with the optimal cutoff values of the CEUS TI-RADS being 5 points, 6 points, 5 points, and 5 points, respectively. Among these groups of nodules, group B had the highest AUC, with the SEN, SPE, ACC, PPV, and NPV for diagnosing malignant nodules being 95.9%, 88.1%, 92.8%, 92.6%, and 93.2%, respectively. The ICC of the CEUS TI-RADS classification between senior and junior physicians was 0.862 (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, CEUS TI-RADS demonstrated significant efficacy in distinguishing thyroid nodules. Nonetheless, there were variations in its capacity to detect malignant nodules across diverse sizes, and it demonstrate optimal performance in 1- to 4-cm nodules. These findings may serve as important insights for clinical diagnoses.