Morishita Toshifumi, Yanai Shunichi, Toya Yosuke, Matsumoto Takayuki
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.
Inflamm Intest Dis. 2024 Jul 17;9(1):174-183. doi: 10.1159/000539738. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
With the recent increase in number of drugs for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it has become important to select treatments acceptable to patients. Endoscopy and biomarkers from blood and stool samples are used to evaluate IBD disease activity. This study aimed to clarify the acceptability of usage of advanced therapy and examination methods in patients through an internet-based survey.
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease were asked via the internet to participate in a survey on the acceptability of nine therapies and three examination methods. The respondents rated acceptability on a scale of 1-10 and specified the most preferred option.
Responses were obtained from 388 patients with ulcerative colitis and 82 with Crohn's disease; 14.5% and 11.5% of the patients underwent intravenous infusions and subcutaneous injections, respectively. Once-daily oral administration had the highest acceptability score, which was significantly different from other administration usages ( < 0.0001), regardless of prior treatment history. Oral administration was preferred by 88.9% of patients. The ranking of examination methods from most to least acceptable was blood tests > endoscopy > stool tests, with significant differences among all groups ( < 0.0001). Blood testing (76%) and stool testing (4.5%) were the most and least preferred methods, respectively.
The most acceptable usage of advanced therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease was once-daily oral administration. Treatments that are effective, safe, and acceptable to patients should be selected, and examination methods acceptable to patients should be used.
随着近期治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)药物数量的增加,选择患者可接受的治疗方法变得至关重要。内镜检查以及血液和粪便样本中的生物标志物被用于评估IBD疾病活动度。本研究旨在通过一项基于互联网的调查,阐明患者对先进治疗方法和检查手段使用的可接受性。
通过互联网邀请炎症性肠病患者参与一项关于九种治疗方法和三种检查手段可接受性的调查。受访者以1至10分的尺度对可接受性进行评分,并指明最偏好的选项。
共获得388例溃疡性结肠炎患者和82例克罗恩病患者的回复;分别有14.5%和11.5%的患者接受过静脉输注和皮下注射。每日一次口服给药的可接受性评分最高,与其他给药方式相比有显著差异(<0.0001),无论既往治疗史如何。88.9%的患者偏好口服给药。检查手段的可接受性排名从高到低依次为血液检测>内镜检查>粪便检测,所有组之间均有显著差异(<0.0001)。血液检测(76%)和粪便检测(4.5%)分别是最偏好和最不偏好的方法。
炎症性肠病患者对先进治疗方法最可接受的使用方式是每日一次口服给药。应选择对患者有效、安全且可接受的治疗方法,并使用患者可接受的检查手段。