• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜抗反流黏膜切除术治疗胃食管反流病的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Outcomes of Endoscopic Antireflux Mucosectomy for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Sanatorio Argentino of San Juan, San Juan.

Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;58(9):851-856. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000002061.

DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000002061
PMID:39145822
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders in western countries. Endoscopic procedures have recently emerged as an alternative therapy to surgery for patients with GERD. The aim of this study was to determine outcomes after endoscopic antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to analyze outcomes after ARMS. The main outcomes included patients' satisfaction, GERD health-related quality of life, use of proton pump inhibitors, and DeMeester score. The secondary endpoint was postprocedural adverse events. A meta-analysis of proportions was used to assess the effect of each approach on different outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies comprising 654 patients were included for analysis. The mean age of patients was 51.83 (36 to 59.39) years, and the mean body mass index was 25.06 (23.5 to 27) kg/m 2 . The weighted pooled proportion of patient satisfaction after ARMS was 65% (95% CI: 52%-76%). The pooled proportion of patients taking proton pump inhibitors decreases from 100% to 40.84% ( P < 0.001). The mean GERD health-related quality of life scores (pre 19.48 vs post 7.90, P < 0.001) and DeMeester score (pre 44.99 vs post 15.02 P = 0.005) significantly improved after ARMS. Overall morbidity rate was 27% (95% CI: 13%-47%), with a weighted pooled proportion of perforation, stricture, and bleeding of 3% (95% CI: 2%-6%), 12% (95% CI: 9%-16%), and 6% (95% CI: 2%-17%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic ARMS for GERD is associated with symptomatic improvement, reduction of medical therapy, and enhanced quality of life. Refinements of the technique, however, are needed to decrease morbidity.

摘要

目的

胃食管反流病(GERD)是西方国家最常见的胃肠道疾病之一。内镜下治疗最近已成为 GERD 患者手术治疗的替代方法。本研究旨在确定内镜抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)后的结果。

方法

对 ARMS 后结果进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。主要结果包括患者满意度、GERD 健康相关生活质量、质子泵抑制剂的使用和 DeMeester 评分。次要终点是术后不良事件。使用比例的荟萃分析评估每种方法对不同结果的影响。

结果

共纳入 22 项研究,共 654 例患者进行分析。患者的平均年龄为 51.83(36 至 59.39)岁,平均体重指数为 25.06(23.5 至 27)kg/m 2 。ARMS 后患者满意度的加权汇总比例为 65%(95%CI:52%-76%)。服用质子泵抑制剂的患者比例从 100%下降到 40.84%(P<0.001)。GERD 健康相关生活质量评分(术前 19.48 分,术后 7.90 分,P<0.001)和 DeMeester 评分(术前 44.99 分,术后 15.02 分,P=0.005)在 ARMS 后显著改善。总体发病率为 27%(95%CI:13%-47%),穿孔、狭窄和出血的加权汇总比例分别为 3%(95%CI:2%-6%)、12%(95%CI:9%-16%)和 6%(95%CI:2%-17%)。

结论

内镜下 ARMS 治疗 GERD 与症状改善、减少药物治疗和提高生活质量有关。然而,需要改进技术以降低发病率。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of Endoscopic Antireflux Mucosectomy for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.内镜抗反流黏膜切除术治疗胃食管反流病的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;58(9):851-856. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000002061.
2
Short and long term effect of anti-reflux mucosectomy with cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for refractory gastroesophageal disease.采用带帽辅助内镜黏膜切除术进行抗反流黏膜切除术治疗难治性胃食管疾病的短期和长期效果
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2180-2187. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10766-2. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
3
First Experience with Banded Anti-reflux Mucosectomy (ARMS) for GERD: Feasibility, Safety, and Technique (with Video).Band 型抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)治疗胃食管反流病的初步经验:可行性、安全性和技术(附视频)。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jun;23(6):1274-1278. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04115-1. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
4
Efficacy and safety of antireflux mucosectomy versus radiofrequency ablation of the lower esophageal sphincter for the treatment of GERD: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗反流黏膜切除术与食管下括约肌射频消融术治疗胃食管反流病的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jul;102(1):14-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.12.026. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
5
Endoscopic treatment of proton pump inhibitor-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease with anti-reflux mucosectomy: Experience of 109 cases.抗反流黏膜切除术治疗质子泵抑制剂难治性胃食管反流病的内镜治疗:109例经验
Dig Endosc. 2021 Mar;33(3):347-354. doi: 10.1111/den.13727. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Does the presence of an esophageal motor disorder influence the response to anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) for refractory GERD?食管动力障碍的存在是否会影响抗反流黏膜切除术(ARMS)治疗难治性 GERD 的反应?
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun;59(6):639-646. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2024.2331554. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
7
Objective Outcomes of an Extended Anti-reflux Mucosectomy in the Treatment of PPI-Dependent Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (with Video).抗反流黏膜切除术治疗质子泵抑制剂(PPI)相关胃食管反流病的疗效观察(附视频)
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Aug;26(8):1566-1574. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05396-9. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
8
Feasibility and outcomes of anti-reflux mucosectomy for proton pump inhibitor dependent gastroesophageal reflux disease: First Indian study (with video).质子泵抑制剂依赖型胃食管反流病抗反流黏膜切除术的可行性及结果:印度的首项研究(附视频)
Dig Endosc. 2020 Jul;32(5):745-752. doi: 10.1111/den.13606. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
9
Comparative clinical feasibility of antireflux mucosectomy and antireflux mucosal ablation in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Retrospective cohort study.抗反流黏膜切除术与抗反流黏膜消融术治疗胃食管反流病的临床可行性比较:回顾性队列研究
Dig Endosc. 2024 Dec;36(12):1328-1337. doi: 10.1111/den.14832. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
10
Anti-reflux mucosectomy using a cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection method for refractory gastroesophageal disease: a prospective feasibility study.使用帽辅助内镜黏膜切除术治疗难治性胃食管疾病的抗反流黏膜切除术:一项前瞻性可行性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1124-1131. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06859-y. Epub 2019 May 28.