The Hilltop Institute, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Sondheim Hall, 3rd Floor, Baltimore, MD 21250. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2024 Aug 1;30(8):e247-e250. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89594.
Given recent congressional interest in codifying price transparency regulations, it is important to understand the extent to which newly available price transparency data capture true underlying procedure-level prices. To that end, we compared the prices for maternity services negotiated between a large payer and 26 hospitals in Mississippi across 2 separate price transparency data sources: payer and hospital. The degree of file overlap is low, with only 16.3% of hospital-billing code observations appearing in both data sources. However, for the observations that overlap, pricing concordance is high: Corresponding prices have a correlation coefficient of 0.975, 77.4% match to the penny, and 84.4% are within 10%. Exact price matching rates are greater than 90% for 3 of the 4 service lines included in this study. Taken together, these results suggest that although administrative misalignment exists between payers and hospitals, there is a measure of signal amid the price transparency noise.
鉴于最近国会对规范价格透明度法规的浓厚兴趣,了解新出现的价格透明度数据在多大程度上捕捉到真正的底层程序级价格非常重要。为此,我们比较了大型支付方和密西西比州 26 家医院之间的产妇服务价格,比较了两个独立的价格透明度数据源:支付方和医院。文件重叠程度较低,只有 16.3%的医院计费代码观察值出现在两个数据源中。然而,对于重叠的观察值,定价一致性很高:对应价格的相关系数为 0.975,精确匹配的比例为 77.4%,84.4%在 10%以内。在这项研究包含的 4 条服务线中,有 3 条的精确价格匹配率超过 90%。总的来说,这些结果表明,尽管支付方和医院之间存在行政上的不一致,但在价格透明度的噪音中存在一定程度的信号。