Rémond Maxime, Smolenschi Cristina, Tarabay Anthony, Gelli Maximiliano, Fernandez-de-Sevilla Elena, Mouawia Ali, Cosconea Simona, Tselikas Lambros, Barbe Remy, Fuerea Alina, Bani Mohamed A, Deloger Marc, Besse Benjamin, Pudlarz Thomas, Valéry Marine, Boige Valérie, Hollebecque Antoine, Ducreux Michel, Boilève Alice
Département de Médecine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Département d'Innovation Thérapeutique et d'Essais Précoces, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Int J Cancer. 2024 Dec 1;155(11):1969-1981. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35135. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a major health burden and may become the second cause of death by cancer in developed countries. The incidence of early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC, defined by an age at diagnosis <50 years old) is increasing. Here, we conducted a study of all PDAC patients followed at our institution. Patients were classified as EOPC or non-early onset (nEOPC, >50). Eight hundred and seventy eight patients were included, of which 113 EOPC, exhibiting a comparable performance status. EOPC were more often diagnosed at the metastatic stage (70.0% vs 58.3%) and liver metastases were more prevalent at diagnosis (60.2% vs. 43.9%). The median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 18.1 months, similar between EOPC and nEOPC. Among patients who underwent surgery, recurrence-free survival was similar between age groups. Among metastatic patients, first line progression free survival was similar but EOPC received more treatment lines (72.3% vs. 58.1% received ≥2 lines). Regarding molecular alterations, the mean tumor mutational burden (TMB) was lower in EOPC (1.42 vs. 2.95 mut/Mb). The prevalence of KRAS and BRCA1/2 mutations was similar, but EOPC displayed fewer alterations in CNKN2A/B. Fifty eight patients (18.6%) had actionable alterations (ESCAT I-III) and 31 of them received molecularly matched treatments. On the transcriptomic level, despite its clinical aggressiveness, EOPC was less likely to display a basal-like phenotype. To conclude, EOPC were diagnosed more frequently at the metastatic stage. OS and 1st line PFS were similar to nEOPC. EOPC displayed specific molecular features, such as a lower TMB and fewer alterations in CDKN2A/B.
胰腺腺癌(PDAC)是一项重大的健康负担,在发达国家可能成为癌症死亡的第二大原因。早发性胰腺癌(EOPC,定义为诊断时年龄<50岁)的发病率正在上升。在此,我们对在我们机构随访的所有PDAC患者进行了一项研究。患者被分为EOPC或非早发性(nEOPC,>50岁)。纳入了878例患者,其中113例为EOPC,表现出相当的体能状态。EOPC在转移阶段被诊断出的频率更高(70.0%对58.3%),且在诊断时肝转移更为普遍(60.2%对43.9%)。从诊断开始的中位总生存期(OS)为18.1个月,EOPC和nEOPC之间相似。在接受手术的患者中,各年龄组的无复发生存期相似。在转移性患者中,一线无进展生存期相似,但EOPC接受的治疗线更多(72.3%对58.1%接受≥2线治疗)。关于分子改变,EOPC的平均肿瘤突变负担(TMB)较低(1.42对2.95个突变/Mb)。KRAS和BRCA1/2突变的发生率相似,但EOPC在CNKN2A/B中的改变较少。58例患者(18.6%)有可操作的改变(ESCAT I-III),其中31例接受了分子匹配治疗。在转录组水平上,尽管EOPC具有临床侵袭性,但它表现出基底样表型的可能性较小。总之,EOPC在转移阶段被诊断出的频率更高。OS和一线PFS与nEOPC相似。EOPC表现出特定的分子特征,如较低的TMB和CDKN2A/B中较少的改变。