• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心耳血栓与房颤患者的分形维数较高相关。

Left atrial appendage thrombus is associated with a higher fractal dimension in patients with atrial fibrillation.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China; Second Clinical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Medical Imaging of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China; Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence, Lanzhou, China.

GE Healthcare, Computed Tomography Research Center, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Clin Imaging. 2024 Oct;114:110247. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110247. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110247
PMID:39146827
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the anatomical complexity of the left atrial appendage (LAA) using fractal dimension (FD) based on cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA) and the association between LAA FD and LAA thrombosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent both cardiac CTA and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) between December 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into normal (n = 925), circulatory stasis (n = 82), and thrombus groups (n = 76) based on TEE results and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for subsequent analysis. FD was calculated to quantify the morphological heterogeneity of LAA. Independent risk factors for thrombus were screened using logistic regression. The diagnostic performance of FD and CHADS-VaSc score for predicting thrombus was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC).

RESULTS

LAA FD was higher in the thrombus group (1.61 [1.49, 1.70], P < 0.001) than in the circulatory stasis (1.33 [1.18, 1.47]) and normal groups (1.30 [1.18, 1.42]) both before and after PSM. LAA FD was also an independent risk factor in the thrombus (OR [odds ratio] = 570,861.15 compared to normal, 41,122.87 compared to circulatory stasis; all P < 0.001) and circulatory stasis group (OR = 98.87, P = 0.001) after PSM. The diagnostic performance of LAA FD was significantly better than the CHADS-VaSc score in identifying thrombus.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with high LAA FD are more likely to develop LAA thrombus, and the use of FD provides an effective method for assessing the risk of thrombosis in AF patients, thereby guiding individualized clinical treatment.

摘要

目的

利用基于心脏计算机断层血管造影(CTA)的分形维数(FD)评估左心耳(LAA)的解剖复杂性,并探讨 LAA FD 与 LAA 血栓之间的关系。

材料与方法

回顾性分析 2018 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月间同时接受心脏 CTA 和经食管超声心动图(TEE)检查的房颤患者。根据 TEE 结果将患者分为正常组(n=925)、循环淤滞组(n=82)和血栓组(n=76),并进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)后进行后续分析。计算 FD 以量化 LAA 的形态异质性。使用 logistic 回归筛选血栓形成的独立危险因素。使用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)评估 FD 和 CHADS-VaSc 评分预测血栓的诊断性能。

结果

血栓组的 LAA FD 高于循环淤滞组(1.61[1.49,1.70],P<0.001)和正常组(1.30[1.18,1.42]),无论是否进行 PSM。LAA FD 也是血栓组(OR[比值比]=570,861.15 与正常组相比,41,122.87 与循环淤滞组相比;均 P<0.001)和循环淤滞组(OR=98.87,P=0.001)的独立危险因素,无论是否进行 PSM。LAA FD 在诊断血栓方面的性能明显优于 CHADS-VaSc 评分。

结论

LAA FD 较高的患者更有可能发生 LAA 血栓形成,FD 的使用为评估房颤患者血栓形成风险提供了一种有效的方法,从而指导个体化的临床治疗。

相似文献

1
Left atrial appendage thrombus is associated with a higher fractal dimension in patients with atrial fibrillation.左心耳血栓与房颤患者的分形维数较高相关。
Clin Imaging. 2024 Oct;114:110247. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110247. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Correlation between left atrial appendage morphology based on fractal dimension quantification and its hemodynamic parameters in patients with atrial fibrillation.基于分形维数量化的左心耳形态与房颤患者血流动力学参数的相关性。
Clin Radiol. 2024 Oct;79(10):e1243-e1251. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.05.022. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
3
Application of computed tomographic angiography and echocardiography in predicting left atrial appendage thrombosis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.计算机断层血管造影和超声心动图在预测非瓣膜性心房颤动患者左心耳血栓中的应用。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2023;34(4):231-236. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2022-052. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
4
Predictive value of left atrial appendage lobes on left atrial thrombus or spontaneous echo contrast in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者左心耳叶对左心房血栓或自发显影的预测价值
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Jul 31;18(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0889-y.
5
Double-contrast, single-phase computed tomography angiography for ruling out left atrial appendage thrombus prior to atrial fibrillation ablation.双对比单相计算机断层血管造影术用于在房颤消融术前排除左心耳血栓。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jan;33(1):121-128. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0973-2. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
6
CTA Detection of Left Atrial Stasis and Thrombus in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.CTA对心房颤动患者左心房血流淤滞及血栓的检测
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Dec;39(12):1388-1393. doi: 10.1111/pace.12959. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
7
Association of atrial fibrosis quantified using LGE-MRI with atrial appendage thrombus and spontaneous contrast on transesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation.使用延迟增强磁共振成像(LGE-MRI)量化的心房纤维化与心房颤动患者经食管超声心动图检查发现的心房附壁血栓及自发显影的相关性。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Oct;24(10):1104-9. doi: 10.1111/jce.12199. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
8
Complex left atrial appendage morphology and left atrial appendage thrombus formation in patients with atrial fibrillation.房颤患者的左心耳形态复杂及左心耳血栓形成。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;7(2):337-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001317. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
9
Transesophageal echocardiography and computerized tomography angiography mismatch in left atrial appendage thrombus evaluation.经食管超声心动图与计算机断层血管造影在左心耳血栓评估中的不匹配
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2024 Jan 1;25(1):63-67. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001538. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
10
Analysis of risk factors for thrombosis of the left atrium/left atrial appendage in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.分析非瓣膜性心房颤动患者左心房/左心耳血栓形成的危险因素。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2021;32(3):116-122. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2019-071. Epub 2021 Apr 16.