Suppr超能文献

与无蒂锯齿状病变相比,中大型腺瘤冷圈套整块切除的疗效

Efficacy of cold piecemeal EMR of medium to large adenomas compared with sessile serrated lesions.

作者信息

Williams Thomas J, Mickenbecker Matthew, Smith Nicholas, Bhasker Vikas, Rubtsov Denis, Jones Andrew, Sabanathan Jeevithan

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Logan Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Department of Gastroenterology, Logan Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jan;101(1):178-183. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.008. Epub 2024 Aug 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is growing evidence for the role of cold piecemeal EMR (C-EMR) in the treatment of colorectal lesions ≥10 mm. However, it is unclear if C-EMR is equally efficacious for all histologic subtypes and sizes. This retrospective study compares the efficacy and safety of C-EMR in the resection of medium (10-19 mm) and large (≥20 mm) serrated and adenomatous lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of Paris IIa colonic lesions resected by using a C-EMR technique over a 3.5-year period at our center.

RESULTS

C-EMR was performed for 242 lesions in 151 patients. Lesion size ranged between 10 and 50 mm, with a median size of 20 mm. Ninety-five polyps were adenomatous, with 147 sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). At 6-month surveillance colonoscopy, the combined recurrence rate was 6.2%. Adenomas ≥20 mm showed a higher rate of recurrence (16.1%) compared with large SSLs (4.1%), medium adenomas (3.0%), and medium SSLs (1.4%). There were no adverse events reported after C-EMR.

CONCLUSIONS

C-EMR seems to be less effective for the resection of large adenomas compared with medium adenomas or large SSLs. C-EMR is equally safe for all lesion sizes and histology.

摘要

背景与目的

越来越多的证据表明,冷圈套息肉切除术(C-EMR)在治疗直径≥10mm的结直肠病变中发挥着作用。然而,目前尚不清楚C-EMR对所有组织学亚型和大小的病变是否同样有效。本回顾性研究比较了C-EMR切除中等大小(10-19mm)和大尺寸(≥20mm)锯齿状及腺瘤性病变的疗效和安全性。

方法

对本中心在3.5年期间采用C-EMR技术切除的巴黎IIa型结肠病变进行回顾性分析。

结果

151例患者的242个病变接受了C-EMR治疗。病变大小在10至50mm之间,中位大小为20mm。其中95个息肉为腺瘤性,147个为无蒂锯齿状病变(SSLs)。在6个月的结肠镜监测中,联合复发率为6.2%。与大尺寸SSLs(4.1%)、中等大小腺瘤(3.0%)和中等大小SSLs(1.4%)相比,≥20mm的腺瘤复发率更高(16.1%)。C-EMR术后未报告不良事件。

结论

与中等大小腺瘤或大尺寸SSLs相比,C-EMR切除大腺瘤的效果似乎较差。C-EMR对所有病变大小和组织学类型同样安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验