• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Targeted Clinical Reasoning Remediation Program for Residents and Fellows in Need.有针对性的临床推理矫正计划,面向有需要的住院医师和研究员。
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Aug;16(4):469-474. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00822.1. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
2
Learner deficits and academic outcomes of medical students, residents, fellows, and attending physicians referred to a remediation program, 2006-2012.2006-2012 年,被推荐参加补救计划的医学生、住院医师、研究员和主治医生的学习缺陷和学业成绩。
Acad Med. 2014 Feb;89(2):352-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000122.
3
Methods and outcomes for the remediation of clinical reasoning.临床推理补救的方法与结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1607-14. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2955-1.
4
Development and Validation of a Formative Assessment Tool for Nephrology Fellows' Clinical Reasoning.肾脏病学住院医师临床推理形成性评估工具的开发与验证。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Jan 1;19(1):26-34. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000315. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
5
Comprehensive Assessment of Struggling Learners Referred to a Graduate Medical Education Remediation Program.对被转介至毕业后医学教育补救计划的学习困难学生的综合评估。
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Dec;9(6):763-767. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00175.1.
6
Objective Assessment of General Surgery Residents Followed by Remediation.普通外科住院医师的客观评估及后续补救措施。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):e71-e76. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
7
A novel concept in residency education: case-based remediation.住院医师培训教育中的一个新概念:基于案例的补救措施。
J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.09.031. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
8
Mental Health Conditions Among Struggling GME Learners: Results From a Single Center Remediation Program.陷入困境的毕业后医学教育(GME)学员的心理健康状况:来自单一中心补救计划的结果
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Dec;12(6):773-777. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00007.1. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
9
Remediation practices for surgery residents.外科住院医师的补救措施。
Am J Surg. 2009 Mar;197(3):397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.10.008.
10
Simple Frameworks for Daily Work: Innovative Strategies to Coach Residents Struggling With Time Management, Organization, and Efficiency.日常工作的简单框架:指导在时间管理、组织和效率方面存在困难的住院医师的创新策略。
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Jun;10(3):325-330. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00756.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptual Differences: Remediation Versus Retaliation in Resident Training.认知差异:住院医师培训中的补救与报复
Acad Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;49(2):121-125. doi: 10.1007/s40596-024-02098-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Targeted Strategies to Remediate Diagnostic Reasoning Deficits.纠正诊断推理缺陷的针对性策略。
Acad Med. 2022 Apr 1;97(4):616. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004244.
2
Mental Health Conditions Among Struggling GME Learners: Results From a Single Center Remediation Program.陷入困境的毕业后医学教育(GME)学员的心理健康状况:来自单一中心补救计划的结果
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Dec;12(6):773-777. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00007.1. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
3
Diagnosing and Remediating Clinical Reasoning Difficulties: A Faculty Development Workshop.诊断与纠正临床推理困难:一次教师发展研讨会
MedEdPORTAL. 2017 Nov 6;13:10650. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10650.
4
Clinical Reasoning Assessment Methods: A Scoping Review and Practical Guidance.临床推理评估方法:范围综述与实践指导。
Acad Med. 2019 Jun;94(6):902-912. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002618.
5
When less is more for the struggling clinical reasoner.对于苦苦挣扎的临床推理者来说,少即是多。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2015 Sep 1;2(3):159-162. doi: 10.1515/dx-2015-0014.
6
Comprehensive Assessment of Struggling Learners Referred to a Graduate Medical Education Remediation Program.对被转介至毕业后医学教育补救计划的学习困难学生的综合评估。
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Dec;9(6):763-767. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00175.1.
7
Diagnosis and management of clinical reasoning difficulties: Part II. Clinical reasoning difficulties: Management and remediation strategies.临床推理困难的诊断和管理:第二部分。临床推理困难:管理和补救策略。
Med Teach. 2017 Aug;39(8):797-801. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1331034. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
8
Methods and outcomes for the remediation of clinical reasoning.临床推理补救的方法与结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1607-14. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2955-1.
9
Learner deficits and academic outcomes of medical students, residents, fellows, and attending physicians referred to a remediation program, 2006-2012.2006-2012 年,被推荐参加补救计划的医学生、住院医师、研究员和主治医生的学习缺陷和学业成绩。
Acad Med. 2014 Feb;89(2):352-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000122.
10
Clinical reasoning difficulties: a taxonomy for clinical teachers.临床推理困难:临床教师的分类法。
Med Teach. 2013;35(3):e984-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.733041. Epub 2012 Dec 11.

有针对性的临床推理矫正计划,面向有需要的住院医师和研究员。

A Targeted Clinical Reasoning Remediation Program for Residents and Fellows in Need.

机构信息

is Associate Professor, Department of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, and Director of Clinical Competency, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

is Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Aug;16(4):469-474. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00822.1. Epub 2024 Aug 15.

DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-23-00822.1
PMID:39148871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11324167/
Abstract

There is no standardized, widely accepted process for individualized clinical reasoning remediation. We describe a novel, targeted assessment and coaching process that allows for individualized intervention for residents and fellows struggling with clinical reasoning. Residents and fellows at the University of Virginia with performance concerns are referred to COACH (Committee on Achieving Competence Through Help) and assessed by a remediation expert. A subset is referred to a clinical reasoning remediation coach who performs an additional assessment and cocreates an individualized remediation plan. Following remediation, residents and fellows are reassessed by their respective programs. We report the frequency of struggle, remediation time invested, and academic outcomes. From 2017 to 2022, 114 residents and fellows referred to COACH met inclusion criteria, of which 38 (33%) had a deficiency in clinical reasoning. Targeted assessment revealed the following microskill deficits: hypothesis generation (16 of 38, 42%); data gathering (6 of 38, 16%); problem representation (7 of 38, 18%); hypothesis refinement (3 of 38, 8%); and management (6 of 38, 16%). Remediation required a mean of nearly 23 hours per trainee. Of the 38 trainees, 33 (87%) are in good standing at the time of writing. Our unique program offers a feasible, targeted approach to clinical reasoning remediation based on our current understanding of the clinical reasoning process. Early hypothesis generation was the most common microskill deficit identified.

摘要

目前,针对个体的临床推理能力补救,尚无标准化且被广泛认可的流程。我们描述了一种新颖的、有针对性的评估和辅导流程,可为在临床推理方面存在困难的住院医师和研究员提供个体化干预。弗吉尼亚大学那些表现不佳的住院医师和研究员会被推荐给 COACH(通过帮助实现能力提升委员会),并由补救专家进行评估。其中一部分人会被推荐给临床推理补救教练,由后者进行额外的评估并共同制定个体化的补救计划。补救结束后,住院医师和研究员将由各自的项目重新评估。我们报告了困难的频率、投入的补救时间以及学术成果。2017 年至 2022 年,共有 114 名被推荐给 COACH 的住院医师和研究员符合纳入标准,其中 38 名(33%)的临床推理能力存在缺陷。有针对性的评估揭示了以下微观技能缺陷:假设生成(38 人中的 16 人,占 42%);数据收集(38 人中的 6 人,占 16%);问题表述(38 人中的 7 人,占 18%);假设细化(38 人中的 3 人,占 8%);以及管理(38 人中的 6 人,占 16%)。每位受训者平均需要近 23 小时的补救时间。在 38 名受训者中,截至撰写本文时,有 33 人(87%)表现良好。我们的独特项目提供了一种基于我们当前对临床推理过程理解的可行的、有针对性的临床推理补救方法。早期假设生成是最常见的微观技能缺陷。