Yoshimi Kana, Inoue Fumi, Odai Tamami, Shirato Nahoko, Watanabe Zen, Otsubo Tempei, Terauchi Masakazu, Takeda Takashi
Division of Women's Health, Research, Institute of Traditional Asian Medicine Kindai University Osaka Japan.
Department of Psychiatry Kyowakai Hannnan, Hospital Osaka Japan.
PCN Rep. 2024 Aug 15;3(3):e234. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.234. eCollection 2024 Sep.
To investigate and compare the diagnoses and treatment of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) from the perspectives of psychiatrists and obstetricians/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) in Japan.
Between December 2021 and February 2022, a web-based survey was conducted among the members of the Japanese Association of Neuro-Psychiatric Clinics. Data from 262 psychiatrists who responded to the aforementioned survey were compared with data from 409 OB/GYNs from a survey conducted in 2021 among members of the Japanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Overall, 79.8% of psychiatrists and 97.3% of OB/GYNs were involved in practicing PMS/PMDD diagnosis and treatment. Most psychiatrists believed that PMS should be treated by OB/GYNs (74.4%) and PMDD by psychiatrists (75.6%). Only vague medical interviews were conducted by 86.6% of psychiatrists, and only 9.7% maintained a two-cycle symptom diary. Psychiatrists mostly prescribed selective serotonin/serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI) continuous dosing (91.1%), followed by Kampo medicines, especially (73.3%); only 2.8% chose oral contraceptive pills, unlike OB/GYNs, while SSRI continuous (32.8%) and luteal phase dosing (20.6%) and Kampo medicine (42.1%) were the most common first-line treatments. Lifestyle guidance was prescribed by 63.6% of psychiatrists, followed by cognitive behavioral therapy (13.8%) and the symptom diary observation method (11.1%), which were similar to OB/GYNs' choices.
Many Japanese psychiatrists and OB/GYNs do not base PMS/PMDD diagnoses on prospective monitoring methods using specific diagnostic criteria and therefore do not provide evidence-based treatment. Moreover, a tendency of being biased toward treatments in which the department specialized was observed.
从日本精神科医生和妇产科医生的角度,调查并比较经前综合征(PMS)和经前烦躁障碍(PMDD)的诊断与治疗情况。
在2021年12月至2022年2月期间,对日本神经精神科诊所协会的成员进行了一项基于网络的调查。将上述调查中262名精神科医生的回复数据,与2021年对日本妇产科学会成员进行的一项调查中409名妇产科医生的数据进行比较。
总体而言,79.8%的精神科医生和97.3%的妇产科医生参与了PMS/PMDD的诊断和治疗。大多数精神科医生认为PMS应由妇产科医生治疗(74.4%),PMDD应由精神科医生治疗(75.6%)。86.6% 的精神科医生仅进行了模糊的医学访谈,只有9.7% 的医生记录了两个周期的症状日记。精神科医生大多开具选择性5-羟色胺/5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SSRI/SNRI)持续给药(91.1%),其次是汉方药物,尤其是(73.3%);与妇产科医生不同,只有2.8% 的人选择口服避孕药,而SSRI持续给药(32.8%)、黄体期给药(20.6%)和汉方药物(42.1%)是最常见的一线治疗方法。63.6% 的精神科医生开具了生活方式指导,其次是认知行为疗法(13.8%)和症状日记观察法(11.1%),这与妇产科医生的选择相似。
许多日本精神科医生和妇产科医生在诊断PMS / PMDD时,并未采用使用特定诊断标准的前瞻性监测方法,因此未提供循证治疗。此外,观察到存在偏向各自专科治疗的倾向。