相似文献
1
How to read -values and confidence intervals in public health studies.如何解读公共卫生研究中的 - 值和置信区间。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2024 Jul-Sep;18(3):459-460. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_128_24. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
2
Computations of confidence intervals for estimates in the United States National Hospital Discharge Survey, 1979-2000.1979 - 2000年美国国家医院出院调查中估计值的置信区间计算
Prev Chronic Dis. 2005 Jul;2(3):A06. Epub 2005 Jun 15.
3
Statistical tools in published articles of a public health journal in 2013 and 2014: bibliometric cross-sectional study.2013年和2014年某公共卫生期刊发表文章中的统计工具：文献计量横断面研究
Medwave. 2015 Aug 31;15(7):e6238. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2015.07.6238.
4
[Epidemiological characteristics and treatment outcome analysis of 229 patients with hydrofluoric acid burns in hands].229例手部氢氟酸烧伤患者的流行病学特征及治疗结果分析
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 20;38(2):156-164. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210517-00188.
5
Read-across estimates of aquatic toxicity for selected fragrances.选择的香料的经文献推导得出的水生生物毒性估计值。
Altern Lab Anim. 2013 Mar;41(1):77-90. doi: 10.1177/026119291304100109.
6
The reporting of values, confidence intervals and statistical significance in Preventive Veterinary Medicine (1997-2017).《预防兽医学》（1997 - 2017年）中数值、置信区间及统计学显著性的报告
PeerJ. 2021 Nov 24;9:e12453. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12453. eCollection 2021.
7
[Confidence intervals and p-values in urology: interpretation and misinterpretation].[泌尿外科中的置信区间和p值：解读与误读]
Urologe A. 2013 Apr;52(4):546-8. doi: 10.1007/s00120-013-3148-y.
8
Confidence intervals in procedural dermatology: an intuitive approach to interpreting data.皮肤外科手术中的置信区间：一种直观的数据解读方法
Dermatol Surg. 2005 Apr;31(4):462-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31115.
9
Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data.直观推断：置信区间以及如何解读数据图表
Am Psychol. 2005 Feb-Mar;60(2):170-80. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.170.
10
A systematic analysis of read-across within REACH registration dossiers.对REACH注册卷宗内的跨类阅读进行系统分析。
Comput Toxicol. 2024 Jun;30:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100304.
引用本文的文献
1
p-Values and confidence intervals as compatibility measures: guidelines for interpreting statistical studies in clinical research.作为兼容性度量的P值和置信区间：临床研究中统计研究解读指南
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2025 Jan 28;33:100534. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100534. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
P>0.05 Is Good: The NORD-h Protocol for Several Hypothesis Analysis Based on Known Risks, Costs, and Benefits.P>0.05 是有益的：基于已知风险、成本和效益的几种假设分析的NORD-h方案。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2024 Nov;57(6):511-520. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.24.250. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
本文引用的文献
1
Recommendations for accurate reporting in medical research statistics.医学研究统计中准确报告的建议。
Lancet. 2024 Feb 17;403(10427):611-612. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00139-9.
2
To curb research misreporting, replace significance and confidence by compatibility: A Preventive Medicine Golden Jubilee article.为了遏制研究报告错误，用兼容性替代显著性和置信度：预防医学金禧文章。
Prev Med. 2022 Nov;164:107127. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107127. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
3
A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration.用于医学论文统计评估的清单（CHAMP 声明）：解释和说明。
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Sep;55(18):1009-1017. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103652. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
4
Scientists rise up against statistical significance.科学家们奋起反对统计显著性。
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7748):305-307. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9.
5
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.统计检验、P 值、置信区间与检验效能：误解指南
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;31(4):337-50. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3. Epub 2016 May 21.
Zotero 插件