• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗传染病患者的道德义务:原因的系统评价

The Ethical Obligation to Treat Infectious Patients: A Systematic Review of Reasons.

机构信息

Division of Trauma, Acute, and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Department of Surgery, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 16;79(2):339-347. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae162.

DOI:10.1093/cid/ciae162
PMID:39149937
Abstract

During pandemics, healthcare providers struggle with balancing obligations to self, family, and patients. While HIV/AIDS seemed to settle this issue, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) rekindled debates regarding treatment refusal. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Complete, and Web of Science using terms including obligation, refusal, HIV/AIDS, COVID-19, and pandemics. After duplicate removal and dual, independent screening, we analyzed 156 articles for quality, ethical position, reasons, and concepts. Diseases in our sample included HIV/AIDS (72.2%), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) (10.2%), COVID-19 (10.2%), Ebola (7.0%), and influenza (7.0%). Most articles (81.9%, n = 128) indicated an obligation to treat. COVID-19 had the highest number of papers indicating ethical acceptability of refusal (60%, P < .001), while HIV had the least (13.3%, P = .026). Several reason domains were significantly different during COVID-19, including unreasonable risks to self/family (26.7%, P < .001) and labor rights/workers' protection (40%, P < .001). A surge in ethics literature during COVID-19 has advocated for permissibility of treatment refusal. Balancing healthcare provision with workforce protection is crucial in effectively responding to a global pandemic.

摘要

在大流行期间,医疗保健提供者在平衡自身、家庭和患者的义务方面面临困难。虽然艾滋病似乎解决了这个问题,但 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)重新引发了关于治疗拒绝的争论。我们使用包括义务、拒绝、艾滋病、COVID-19 和大流行在内的术语,在 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL Complete 和 Web of Science 上进行了搜索。在去除重复项并进行双重、独立筛选后,我们分析了 156 篇文章,以评估其质量、伦理立场、原因和概念。我们样本中的疾病包括艾滋病(72.2%)、严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)(10.2%)、COVID-19(10.2%)、埃博拉(7.0%)和流感(7.0%)。大多数文章(81.9%,n=128)表明有治疗义务。COVID-19 有最多的论文表明拒绝具有伦理可接受性(60%,P<.001),而艾滋病则最少(13.3%,P=.026)。在 COVID-19 期间,几个原因领域有显著差异,包括对自身/家庭的不合理风险(26.7%,P<.001)和劳工权利/工人保护(40%,P<.001)。COVID-19 期间伦理学文献的激增主张治疗拒绝的许可性。在有效应对全球大流行时,平衡医疗服务提供与劳动力保护至关重要。

相似文献

1
The Ethical Obligation to Treat Infectious Patients: A Systematic Review of Reasons.治疗传染病患者的道德义务:原因的系统评价
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 16;79(2):339-347. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae162.
2
The healthcare worker at risk during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Jewish ethical perspective.COVID-19 大流行期间处于风险中的医护人员:犹太教伦理视角。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):441-443. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106294. Epub 2020 May 18.
3
Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review.在疾病爆发、流行或大流行期间及之后,为支持一线卫生和社会护理专业人员的适应能力和心理健康所采取的干预措施:一项混合方法的系统评价
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 5;11(11):CD013779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013779.
4
Moral distress among healthcare providers and mistrust among patients during COVID-19 in Bangladesh.孟加拉国 COVID-19 期间医护人员的道德困境和患者的不信任。
Dev World Bioeth. 2021 Dec;21(4):187-192. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12291. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
5
HIV prevention research and COVID-19: putting ethics guidance to the test.HIV 预防研究与 COVID-19:检验伦理指南。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jan 25;22(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00575-w.
6
Use of powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) by healthcare workers for preventing highly infectious viral diseases-a systematic review of evidence.医护人员使用动力送风过滤式呼吸防护器(PAPR)预防高传染性病毒病的证据的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 8;9(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01431-5.
7
Doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic: what are their duties and what is owed to them?COVID-19 大流行期间的医生:他们的职责是什么?他们应得什么?
J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):12-15. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106266. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
8
On pandemics and the duty to care: whose duty? who cares?论大流行与照护义务:谁的义务?谁来照护?
BMC Med Ethics. 2006 Apr 20;7:E5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-7-5.
9
A scoping review of ethics review processes during public health emergencies in Africa.非洲突发公共卫生事件中的伦理审查流程的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 22;25(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01054-8.
10
What We Have Learned from Two Decades of Epidemics and Pandemics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Burden of Frontline Healthcare Workers.从二十年的传染病和大流行中吸取的教训:对一线医护人员心理负担的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(3):178-190. doi: 10.1159/000513733. Epub 2021 Feb 1.