• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院熟练护理设施的整合和参与捆绑式支付计划。

Hospital-Skilled Nursing Facility Integration and Participation in a Bundled Payment Initiative.

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Now with Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425627. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25627.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25627
PMID:39150712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11329878/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Reduced institutional postacute care has been associated with savings in alternative payment models. However, organizations may avoid voluntary participation if participation could threaten their own revenues.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the association between hospital-skilled nursing facility (SNF) integration and participation in Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-A) program.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of hospital participation in BPCI-A beginning with its launch in 2018. Each SNF-integrated hospital was matched with 2 nonintegrated hospitals for each of 4 episode-specific analyses. Fifteen hospital-level variables were used for matching: beds, case mix index, days, area SNF beds, metropolitan location, ownership, region, system membership, and teaching status. Hospitals were also matched on episode-specific volume, target price, and the interaction of target price and case mix. Episode-specific logistic models were estimated regressing hospital participation on integration and the previously listed variables. The marginal effect of integration on participation was then calculated. Analysis took place from August 2022 to May 2024.

EXPOSURE

Hospital-SNF integration, as defined by common ownership and referral patterns and identified using cost reports, Medicare claims, and Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System records. Additional sources included records of target prices and participation, the Area Health Resources File, and the Compendium of US Health Systems.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Participation in BPCI-A.

RESULTS

In total, 1524 hospitals met criteria for inclusion in the hip and femur (HFP) analysis, 1825 were included in the major joint replacement of the lower extremity (MJRLE) analysis, 2018 were included in the sepsis analysis, and 1564, were included in the stroke-specific analysis. Across episodes, 191 HFP-eligible hospitals (12.5% of HFP-eligible hospitals), 302 MJRLE-eligible hospitals (16.5%), 327 sepsis-eligible hospitals (16.2%), and 185 sepsis-eligible hospitals (11.8%) were SNF integrated. In total, 79 hospitals (5.2%) participated in the HFP episode, 128 (7.0%) participated in the MJRLE episode, 204 (10.1%) participated in the sepsis episode, and 141 (9.0%) participated in the stroke episode. Integration was associated with a 4.7-percentage point decrease (95% CI, 2.4 to 6.9 percentage points) in participation in the MJRLE episode. There was no association between integration and participation for HFP (0.5-percentage point increase in participation moving from nonintegrated to integrated; 95% CI, -2.9 to 3.8 percentage points), sepsis (1.0-percentage point increase; 95% CI, -2.2 to 4.2 percentage points), and stroke (0.3-percentage point decrease; 95% CI, -3.1 to 3.8 percentage points).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, there was an uneven association between hospital-SNF integration and participation in Medicare's BPCI-A program. Other factors may be more consistent determinants of selection into voluntary payment reform.

摘要

重要性

减少机构性的住院后护理与节约替代支付模式有关。然而,如果参与可能威胁到自己的收入,组织可能会避免自愿参与。

目的

描述医院-熟练护理设施(SNF)整合与参与医疗保险捆绑支付改善高级(BPCI-A)计划之间的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项从 2018 年开始的关于 BPCI-A 启动时医院参与情况的横断面分析。每个 SNF 整合医院都与 4 个特定病例的 2 个非整合医院相匹配。15 个医院级别的变量用于匹配:床位、病例组合指数、天数、地区 SNF 床位、大都市位置、所有权、地区、系统成员和教学地位。医院还根据特定病例的数量、目标价格以及目标价格和病例组合的相互作用进行匹配。对特定病例的逻辑模型进行了估计,以回归医院参与情况与整合和之前列出的变量。然后计算整合对参与的边际效应。分析于 2022 年 8 月至 2024 年 5 月进行。

暴露

SNF 整合,通过共同所有权和转诊模式定义,并通过成本报告、医疗保险索赔和提供者登记、连锁和所有权系统记录来识别。其他来源包括目标价格和参与记录、区域卫生资源文件和美国卫生系统汇编。

主要结果和测量

参与 BPCI-A。

结果

共有 1524 家医院符合髋关节和股骨(HFP)分析的纳入标准,1825 家医院符合下肢大关节置换术(MJRLE)分析的纳入标准,2018 家医院符合脓毒症分析的纳入标准,1564 家医院符合中风特定分析的纳入标准。在所有病例中,191 家 HFP 合格医院(HFP 合格医院的 12.5%)、302 家 MJRLE 合格医院(16.5%)、327 家脓毒症合格医院(16.2%)和 185 家脓毒症合格医院(11.8%)为 SNF 整合医院。共有 79 家医院(5.2%)参与了 HFP 病例,128 家(7.0%)参与了 MJRLE 病例,204 家(10.1%)参与了脓毒症病例,141 家(9.0%)参与了中风病例。整合与参与 MJRLE 病例的比例下降了 4.7 个百分点(95%CI,2.4 至 6.9 个百分点)。整合与 HFP(从非整合到整合参与比例增加 0.5 个百分点;95%CI,-2.9 至 3.8 个百分点)、脓毒症(增加 1.0 个百分点;95%CI,-2.2 至 4.2 个百分点)和中风(减少 0.3 个百分点;95%CI,-3.1 至 3.8 个百分点)的参与之间没有关联。

结论和相关性

在这项横断面研究中,医院-SNF 整合与参与医疗保险的 BPCI-A 计划之间存在不均衡的关联。其他因素可能是选择自愿支付改革的更一致的决定因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb97/11329878/ec9aef3d2ba2/jamanetwopen-e2425627-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb97/11329878/673066e94152/jamanetwopen-e2425627-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb97/11329878/d1fc9661f4be/jamanetwopen-e2425627-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb97/11329878/ec9aef3d2ba2/jamanetwopen-e2425627-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb97/11329878/673066e94152/jamanetwopen-e2425627-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb97/11329878/d1fc9661f4be/jamanetwopen-e2425627-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb97/11329878/ec9aef3d2ba2/jamanetwopen-e2425627-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Hospital-Skilled Nursing Facility Integration and Participation in a Bundled Payment Initiative.医院熟练护理设施的整合和参与捆绑式支付计划。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2425627. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25627.
2
Association of Hospital Participation in a Medicare Bundled Payment Program With Volume and Case Mix of Lower Extremity Joint Replacement Episodes.医院参与 Medicare 打包支付计划与下肢关节置换术例数和病例组合的关联。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 4;320(9):901-910. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12345.
3
Association of Skilled Nursing Facility Participation in a Bundled Payment Model With Institutional Spending for Joint Replacement Surgery.参与捆绑式支付模式的熟练护理机构与关节置换手术机构支出的关联。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 10;324(18):1869-1877. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.19181.
4
Savings and outcomes under Medicare's bundled payments initiative for skilled nursing facilities.医疗保险熟练护理设施捆绑支付计划下的储蓄和结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Dec;69(12):3422-3434. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17409. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
5
Medicare's bundled payment model did not change skilled nursing facility discharge patterns.医疗保险的打包支付模式并未改变熟练护理设施的出院模式。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jul;25(7):329-334.
6
Skilled Nursing Facility Participation in Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative: A Retrospective Study.参与医疗保险捆绑支付改善护理计划的熟练护理设施:一项回顾性研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Feb;100(2):307-314. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.08.186. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
7
Mandatory Medicare Bundled Payment Program for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement and Discharge to Institutional Postacute Care: Interim Analysis of the First Year of a 5-Year Randomized Trial.强制性医疗保险捆绑支付计划,用于下肢关节置换和转至机构性康复治疗:一项 5 年随机试验的第一年中期分析。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 4;320(9):892-900. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12346.
8
Association of Bundled Payments for Joint Replacement Surgery and Patient Outcomes With Simultaneous Hospital Participation in Accountable Care Organizations.关节置换手术捆绑支付与患者结局与同时参与责任医疗组织的医院之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1912270. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12270.
9
Bundled payments lead to quality improvements in hospitals' skilled nursing facility referral networks.捆绑支付促使医院熟练护理设施转介网络的质量得到改善。
Am J Manag Care. 2024 Jun 1;30(6):e184-e190. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89566.
10
Post-Acute Care After Joint Replacement in Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative.医疗保险捆绑支付改善计划中关节置换术后的康复护理。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 May;67(5):1027-1035. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15803. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

1
New CMS Nursing Home Ownership Data: Major Gaps And Discrepancies.新 CMS 养老院所有权数据:主要差距和差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Mar;43(3):318-326. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01110.
2
Association of Skilled Nursing Facility Ownership by Health Care Networks With Utilization and Spending.医疗保健网络拥有的熟练护理设施与利用和支出的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e230140. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0140.
3
VOLUNTARY REGULATION: EVIDENCE FROM MEDICARE PAYMENT REFORM.自愿监管:医疗保险支付改革的证据
Q J Econ. 2022 Feb;137(1):565-618. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjab035. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
4
Outcomes After Shortened Skilled Nursing Facility Stays Suggest Potential For Improving Postacute Care Efficiency.缩短康复护理机构住院时间后的结果表明改善康复后护理效率具有潜力。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 May;40(5):745-753. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00649.
5
Target Prices Influence Hospital Participation And Shared Savings In Medicare Bundled Payment Program.目标价格影响医院参与医疗保险捆绑支付计划的情况及共享节约额。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Sep;39(9):1479-1485. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00104.
6
Medicare's Bundled Payment Initiatives for Hospital-Initiated Episodes: Evidence and Evolution.医疗保险对医院发起的疾病诊治整体支付计划:证据与演变。
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):908-974. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12465. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
7
Savings or Selection? Initial Spending Reductions in the Medicare Shared Savings Program and Considerations for Reform.储蓄还是选择?医疗保险共享储蓄计划中的初始支出削减及其改革考虑。
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):847-907. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12468. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
8
Spending and quality after three years of Medicare's bundled payments for medical conditions: quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study.医保捆绑付费政策实施三年后对医疗状况的支出和质量的影响:准实验双重差分研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 17;369:m1780. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1780.
9
Spending And Quality After Three Years Of Medicare's Voluntary Bundled Payment For Joint Replacement Surgery.医保自愿捆绑支付关节置换手术三年后的支出和质量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):58-66. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00466.
10
Postacute Care - The Piggy Bank for Savings in Alternative Payment Models?急性后期护理——替代支付模式中的储蓄存钱罐?
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 25;381(4):302-303. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1901896.