Suppr超能文献

帕金森病的清醒与睡眠状态下深部脑刺激:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Awake versus asleep deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Maroufi Seyed Farzad, Fallahi Mohammad Sadegh, Hosseinzadeh Asli Saba, Khorasanizadeh MirHojjat, Pour-Rashidi Ahmad, Ponce Francisco A, Slavin Konstantin V

机构信息

1Neurosurgical Research Network (NRN), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran.

2Department of Neurosurgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2024 Aug 16;142(2):324-338. doi: 10.3171/2024.4.JNS232553. Print 2025 Feb 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become an effective and safe treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) not responding to conventional treatments. With the growing body of literature regarding the use of DBS in different movement disorders, there remain controversies regarding performing awake or asleep DBS. This systematic review provides the most comprehensive review of the literature comparing the two techniques from various aspects in detail.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted. All studies comparing any aspects of asleep and awake DBS were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Meta-analysis was conducted with consideration of baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies with 2563 PD patients were included. A total of 1423 patients underwent asleep DBS. The two groups were comparable regarding their baseline characteristics. The follow-up ranged from 3 to 60 months. The two DBS techniques were comparable in terms of motor symptom improvements and levodopa equivalent daily doses. However, the asleep technique showed slightly better improvements in Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire scores. Moreover, the asleep technique was associated with more surgical adverse events, whereas pneumocephalus and psychological disorders such as mood, affect, and cognitive disorders were more common in the awake technique. Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences in outcomes between asleep and awake DBS when categorized by targeted brain nuclei, use of intraoperative or preoperative imaging, and whether microelectrode recordings were used.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest comparable clinical outcomes between the two DBS approaches. The two methods had their salient differences in terms of lead passes and specific adverse events. The decision to perform awake or asleep DBS should be based on the patient's preference, the surgeon's experience, the availability of advanced intraoperative imaging, and the patient's tolerance for specific adverse events.

摘要

目的

对于对传统治疗无反应的帕金森病(PD)患者,深部脑刺激(DBS)已成为一种有效且安全的治疗方法。随着关于DBS在不同运动障碍中应用的文献不断增加,关于进行清醒或睡眠状态下DBS仍存在争议。本系统评价从各个方面详细比较了这两种技术,提供了最全面的文献综述。

方法

对PubMed、Scopus、科学网和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行系统评价。纳入所有比较睡眠状态和清醒状态下DBS任何方面的研究。使用干预性非随机研究中的偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。在考虑基线特征的情况下进行荟萃分析。

结果

纳入了31项研究,共2563例PD患者。共有1423例患者接受了睡眠状态下DBS。两组在基线特征方面具有可比性。随访时间为3至60个月。两种DBS技术在运动症状改善和左旋多巴等效日剂量方面具有可比性。然而,睡眠状态下的技术在马蒂斯痴呆评定量表和帕金森病问卷评分方面显示出稍好的改善。此外,睡眠状态下的技术与更多的手术不良事件相关,而气颅和心理障碍如情绪、情感和认知障碍在清醒状态下的技术中更为常见。亚组分析显示,按靶向脑核、术中或术前成像的使用以及是否使用微电极记录进行分类时,睡眠状态和清醒状态下DBS的结果无显著差异。

结论

这些发现表明两种DBS方法的临床结果具有可比性。这两种方法在电极植入过程和特定不良事件方面存在显著差异。进行清醒或睡眠状态下DBS的决定应基于患者的偏好、外科医生的经验、先进术中成像的可用性以及患者对特定不良事件的耐受性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验