• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期发病与早期发病的类风湿关节炎患者首次接受生物疗法的药物生存比较:一项基于人群的队列研究。

Drug Survival on First Biologic Therapy Among Late-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Compared to Early-Onset Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

机构信息

Rheumatology Unit, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel.

Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel.

出版信息

Musculoskeletal Care. 2024 Sep;22(3):e1928. doi: 10.1002/msc.1928.

DOI:10.1002/msc.1928
PMID:39152548
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients can be divided according to the age of disease onset and classified as late-onset RA ≥ 60 years old or early-onset RA < 60 years old. Current treatment guidelines do not stipulate any preference regarding the biologic that should be used first in the late-onset group. This study aims to compare the drug survival times on first biological treatment between late and early-onset RA patients.

METHODS

This is a population based cohort study using the medical records of Leumit healthcare services. We included all eligible RA patients between 2000 and 2017. RA patients were divided into late- and early-onset RA groups and compared according to drug survival time on the first biological therapy.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 3814 RA patients, 2807 (73.6%) of whom had early-onset RA. Overall, biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were used more often among early-onset compared to late-onset patients (16.9% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001). Among early-onset patients, etanercept was associated with the longest drug survival time on the first biologic, and adalimumab and infliximab were associated with the longest drug survival times among late-onset patients. No differences were observed in drug survival times between late and early-onset patients on the first bDMARD, except for abatacept and golimumab with longer drug survival time among early-onset patients.

CONCLUSION

Late-onset RA patients were treated with biologics to a lesser extent than early-onset patients, but no differences were observed in drug survival times at the first bDMARD between the two groups.

摘要

简介

类风湿关节炎(RA)患者可根据发病年龄分为晚发性 RA(≥60 岁)和早发性 RA(<60 岁)。目前的治疗指南并未规定晚发性患者应优先使用哪种生物制剂。本研究旨在比较晚发性和早发性 RA 患者首次生物治疗的药物生存时间。

方法

这是一项基于人群的队列研究,使用 Leumit 医疗服务的病历资料。我们纳入了 2000 年至 2017 年间所有符合条件的 RA 患者。将 RA 患者分为晚发性和早发性 RA 组,并根据首次生物治疗的药物生存时间进行比较。

结果

最终纳入了 3814 例 RA 患者,其中 2807 例(73.6%)为早发性 RA。总体而言,与晚发性患者相比,早发性患者更常使用生物疾病修饰抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)(16.9% vs. 7.8%,p<0.001)。在早发性患者中,依那西普与首次生物制剂的最长药物生存时间相关,阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗与晚发性患者的最长药物生存时间相关。除了依那西普和戈利木单抗在早发性患者中药物生存时间更长外,晚发性和早发性患者在首次 bDMARD 药物的生存时间方面没有差异。

结论

与早发性患者相比,晚发性 RA 患者接受生物制剂治疗的程度较低,但两组患者首次 bDMARD 的药物生存时间无差异。

相似文献

1
Drug Survival on First Biologic Therapy Among Late-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Compared to Early-Onset Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study.晚期发病与早期发病的类风湿关节炎患者首次接受生物疗法的药物生存比较:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2024 Sep;22(3):e1928. doi: 10.1002/msc.1928.
2
Factors associated with drug survival on first biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based cohort study.类风湿关节炎患者首次生物制剂治疗药物留存率的相关因素:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Nov;41(11):1905-1913. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04989-y. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
Comparative effectiveness of first-line biological monotherapy use in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis of the RECord-linkage On Rheumatic Diseases study on health care administrative databases.类风湿关节炎一线生物单药治疗的比较疗效:基于医疗保健管理数据库的风湿性疾病记录链接研究的回顾性分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 11;8(9):e021447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021447.
4
Biologics or tofacitinib for people with rheumatoid arthritis naive to methotrexate: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.生物制剂或托法替布用于初治类风湿关节炎患者:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 8;5(5):CD012657. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012657.
5
Real-world Effectiveness of Biologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis After Etanercept Discontinuation in the United Kingdom, France, and Germany.英国、法国和德国生物性改善病情抗风湿药在停用依那西普后治疗类风湿关节炎的真实世界疗效
Clin Ther. 2017 Aug;39(8):1618-1627. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
6
Cost and effectiveness of biologics for rheumatoid arthritis in a commercially insured population.生物制剂治疗类风湿关节炎在商业保险人群中的成本效果分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Apr;21(4):318-29. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.4.318.
7
Comparative effectiveness of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified by body mass index: a cohort study in a Swiss registry.生物制剂在类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效比较:瑞士注册研究中的队列研究,按体重指数分层。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 8;14(2):e074864. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074864.
8
Response to Biologic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Antidrug Antibodies.类风湿关节炎伴抗药物抗体患者对生物制剂的反应。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2323098. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23098.
9
Effectiveness and drug adherence of biologic monotherapy in routine care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cohort study of patients registered in the Danish biologics registry.生物单药疗法在类风湿关节炎常规治疗中的疗效和药物依从性:丹麦生物制剂登记处登记患者的队列研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Dec;54(12):2156-65. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev216. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
10
Treatment persistence among patients with rheumatoid disease (RA, AS, PsA) treated with subcutaneous biologics in Germany.德国接受皮下生物制剂治疗的类风湿病(类风湿关节炎、强直性脊柱炎、银屑病关节炎)患者的治疗持续性。
Rheumatol Int. 2016 Jan;36(1):143-53. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3348-4. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
CX3CR1 age-associated CD4 T cells contribute to synovial inflammation in late-onset rheumatoid arthritis.CX3CR1 年龄相关的 CD4 T 细胞促成迟发性类风湿关节炎中的滑膜炎症。
Inflamm Regen. 2025 Feb 6;45(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41232-025-00367-4.