LABOSUD Laboratory (Inovie member), Montpellier, France.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2024 Sep;84(5):350-355. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2024.2392633. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
In the presence of haemolysis, the interpretation of the Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity result is a major operational challenge for medical laboratories: if the origin is intravascular, then the measurement will reflect the clinical reality, but in extravascular haemolysis, the laboratory will be confronted with an artefactual increase leading to false-positive high results. The aim of our study was to evaluate the adjustment of LDH concentration results according to the haemolysis index (HI). After designed a mathematical model to correct the LDH measured as a function of the haemolysis index using a Cobas 8000 analyser (Roche diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), LDH measurement of seventy-four duplicate samples were tested before and after exposure to extravascular haemolysis process. After haemolysis process, a significant increase haemolysis index (Man-Whitney U-Test < 0.0001) were observed. Before process the HI median was 4 [2.0 - 6.75] and after HI median was 18 [10 - 35.75]. Without correction, LDH results showed a significant increase ( < 0.001) after haemolysis process and substantial analytical discrepancies (31/74) were observed according to TEa of CLIA. After correction, data showed no significant difference ( = 0.497) and the mathematical algorithm allowed to reduce the analytical discrepancies (2/74). If haemolysis was present , the mathematical algorithm increased the accuracy of the LDH results. However, the lack of discrimination between and haemolysis requires caution and the results should be reported only as a commentary to inform the clinician.
在溶血存在的情况下,乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)活性结果的解释对医学实验室来说是一个主要的操作挑战:如果来源是血管内的,那么测量将反映临床实际情况,但在血管外溶血中,实验室将面临人为的增加,导致假阳性的高结果。我们的研究目的是评估根据溶血指数(HI)调整 LDH 浓度结果。设计了一种数学模型,用于根据溶血指数使用 Cobas 8000 分析仪(罗氏诊断,曼海姆,德国)校正测量的 LDH,然后在暴露于血管外溶血过程之前和之后测试了七十四份重复样本的 LDH 测量值。在溶血过程后,观察到溶血指数(曼-惠特尼 U 检验 < 0.0001)显著增加。处理前 HI 的中位数为 4 [2.0-6.75],处理后 HI 的中位数为 18 [10-35.75]。未经校正,LDH 结果在溶血过程后显示出显著增加(< 0.001),并且根据 CLIA 的 TEa 观察到大量分析差异(31/74)。校正后,数据无显著差异(= 0.497),数学算法允许减少分析差异(2/74)。如果存在溶血,数学算法会提高 LDH 结果的准确性。然而,对 和 溶血之间缺乏区分需要谨慎,结果只能作为评论报告,以告知临床医生。