• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

收肌管和隐神经联合阻滞联合膝关节胭动脉与后囊间隙局部麻醉注射及局部浸润镇痛对全膝关节置换术后疼痛和功能结局的影响:一项随机对照研究。

Efficacy of adductor canal and popliteal plexus block combined with local anesthetic injection in the interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee and local infiltrative analgesia for postoperative pain and functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Knee. 2024 Oct;50:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.023. Epub 2024 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.023
PMID:39153415
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adductor canal block and periarticular infiltration analgesia (PIA) have been shown to relieve pain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) effectively. However, their analgesic effectiveness has some limitations. Thus, we considered a novel blocking site that could achieve analgesia without affecting the muscle strength of the lower limbs.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized into two groups. One group was treated with adductor canal and popliteal plexus (APB) combined with interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee (iPACK) and local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) and the other was treated with PIA. The primary outcomes included postoperative pain, as assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS), and the consumption of oral tramadol. Secondary outcomes included functional recovery and daily ambulation distance. Tertiary outcomes included postoperative adverse effects.

RESULTS

The APB group had lower VAS scores after surgery at rest and during motion. Compared with the PIA group, the walking distance of the APB group on the second day was greater. The muscle strength of the APB group was lower than that of the PIA group at the early stage. Patients in the APB group also consumed less tramadol than those in the PIA group. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

APB combined with iPACK and LIA is a novel block for TKA, and it can reduce postoperative pain sooner after TKA without affecting postoperative functional recovery or increasing complications.

摘要

背景

股神经阻滞和关节周围浸润镇痛(PIA)已被证明可有效缓解全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的疼痛。然而,它们的镇痛效果存在一些局限性。因此,我们考虑了一种新的阻滞部位,它可以在不影响下肢肌肉力量的情况下实现镇痛。

方法

72 例行单侧初次全膝关节置换术的患者被随机分为两组。一组采用股神经和隐神经(APB)联合膝关节腘动脉和后囊间隙(iPACK)和局部浸润麻醉(LIA)治疗,另一组采用 PIA 治疗。主要结局包括术后疼痛,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估,以及口服曲马多的消耗量。次要结局包括功能恢复和每日活动距离。次要结局包括术后不良反应。

结果

APB 组术后静息和运动时 VAS 评分较低。与 PIA 组相比,APB 组术后第 2 天的步行距离更大。APB 组的肌肉力量在早期低于 PIA 组。APB 组患者的曲马多消耗量也少于 PIA 组。两组不良反应发生率无差异。

结论

APB 联合 iPACK 和 LIA 是 TKA 的一种新的阻滞方法,它可以在不影响术后功能恢复或增加并发症的情况下,更早地减轻 TKA 后的术后疼痛。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of adductor canal and popliteal plexus block combined with local anesthetic injection in the interspace between the popliteal artery and posterior capsule of the knee and local infiltrative analgesia for postoperative pain and functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled study.收肌管和隐神经联合阻滞联合膝关节胭动脉与后囊间隙局部麻醉注射及局部浸润镇痛对全膝关节置换术后疼痛和功能结局的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Knee. 2024 Oct;50:107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.023. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
2
Efficacy of adding infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) to adductor canal block and local infiltration analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study.腘动脉与后膝关节囊之间(IPACK)浸润联合收肌管阻滞和局部浸润镇痛在全膝关节置换术中的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2024 May-Aug;32(2):10225536241265445. doi: 10.1177/10225536241265445.
3
The effect of continuous adductor canal block combined with distal interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee block for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.连续收肌管阻滞联合膝后囊与腘窝间隙阻滞在全膝关节置换术中的效果:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jun 6;22(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01712-7.
4
What Is the Role of a Periarticular Injection for Knee Arthroplasty Patients Receiving a Multimodal Analgesia Regimen Incorporating Adductor Canal and Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee Blocks? A Randomized Blinded Placebo-Controlled Noninferiority Trial.膝关节置换术后多模式镇痛方案中包含收肌管阻滞和膝关节囊下隐窝浸润,关节周围注射的作用是什么?一项随机、盲法、安慰剂对照非劣效性试验。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Jun 1;138(6):1163-1172. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006805. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
5
Continuous adductor canal block is superior to adductor canal block alone or adductor canal block combined with IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of knee) in postoperative analgesia and ambulation following total knee arthroplasty: randomized control trial.连续收肌管阻滞优于单独收肌管阻滞或收肌管阻滞联合 IPACK 阻滞(腘动脉和膝关节后囊之间的间隙)在全膝关节置换术后的镇痛和活动:随机对照试验。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2022 Jun;106(2):155-162. doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00682-8. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
6
iPACK block (local anesthetic infiltration of the interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior knee capsule) added to the adductor canal blocks versus the adductor canal blocks in the pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.iPACK 阻滞(即隐动脉和后膝关节囊之间的间隙局部麻醉浸润)联合收肌管阻滞与单纯收肌管阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后疼痛管理的效果比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Aug 12;17(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03272-5.
7
Comparison of adductor canal block and IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) with adductor canal block alone after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective control trial on pain and knee function in immediate postoperative period.全膝关节置换术后内收肌管阻滞与IPACK阻滞(腘动脉与后膝关节囊间隙)联合单纯内收肌管阻滞的比较:术后即刻疼痛和膝关节功能的前瞻性对照试验
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Oct;28(7):1391-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2218-7. Epub 2018 May 2.
8
Adductor Canal Block Combined With iPACK (Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee) Block vs Periarticular Injection for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.收肌管阻滞联合 iPACK(腘动脉和膝关节后囊间隙)阻滞与关节周围注射用于全膝关节置换术后镇痛的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):122-129.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.086. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
9
Analgesic efficacy of infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (iPACK) block added to local infiltration analgesia and continuous adductor canal block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.膝关节囊旁和腘窝动脉阻滞(iPACK)复合局部浸润麻醉与连续收肌管阻滞对全膝关节置换术后镇痛效果的随机临床试验
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Nov;45(11):872-879. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101396. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
10
Adductor Canal Block Combined with Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee (iPACK) versus Periarticular Injection for Total Knee Arthroplasty.收肌管阻滞联合膝关节囊和胭窝(iPACK)与关节周围注射用于全膝关节置换术。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(4):514-521. doi: 10.4055/cios21108. Epub 2022 Jun 30.