Department of Urology, Yale University School of Medicine, USA.
Department of Urology, Albany Medical Center, USA.
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Dec;20(6):1192-1199. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.07.018. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Requests for circumcision revision are common in our American pediatric urology clinic. As parents are the surrogate decision maker for their child, there are several influences that can impact a parent's decision for or against circumcision.
We sought to assess parents' regret regarding their child's circumcision status and to correlate regret to factors that might have affected the original decision.
From March 2023 to January 2024, we surveyed parents who brought their male child to our office for any reason, independent of circumcision status. The questionnaire was two-fold: a validated Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) (0-100 where higher scores = higher regret) and our questions regarding their decision-making process and outcome. Regret scores served as a function of each of the independent decision making and outcome variables.
Overall, decisional regret scores from both uncircumcised and circumcised parent groups were positively skewed with a median 0, mean 22, and ranged from 0 to 75. For those circumcised (n = 91), the median regret score was 0 (IQR 0-25). For those uncircumcised (n = 28), median regret score was 0 (IQR 0-24). Overall, 55% of both groups reported no regret (DRS = 0), 24% had low-mild regret (DRS 5-25), and 21% yielded moderate-strong regret (DRS 30-100). Parents who felt they made an informed decision or were counseled by any physician had lower regret scores. Parents who presented for issues related to their child's uncircumcised or circumcised penis (DRS score 37.5 and 25 respectively) had higher regret scores.
We found that a large portion of parents expressed no regret regarding their decision to have or not have their child circumcised (55%). There also was no difference in median regret scores between parent groups. However, a significant portion of parents did express moderate-strong regret (21%) and several influential factors were correlated with regret scores. These factors included informed decision making, physician counseling, appearance satisfaction, and problems related to their child's circumcised or uncircumcised penis. These factors are supported by other literature using the DRS and population studies. The limitations of our study included the limited recruitment of participants and potential time dependent bias of responses.
One in five parents of both circumcised and uncircumcised boys expressed moderate to strong regret regarding their decision about neonatal circumcision in our pediatric urology clinic. Our data suggests that ensuring parents have sufficient counseling prior to a decision regarding neonatal circumcision is important.
简介/背景:在我们的美国儿科泌尿科诊所,经常有家长要求对孩子进行割礼修复。由于父母是孩子的法定监护人,因此有几个因素会影响父母对割礼的支持或反对。
我们旨在评估父母对孩子割礼状况的后悔程度,并将这种后悔与可能影响最初决策的因素相关联。
从 2023 年 3 月至 2024 年 1 月,我们调查了带男孩来我们办公室就诊的父母,不论他们的割礼状况如何,都是独立的。问卷分为两部分:一份经过验证的决策后悔量表(DRS)(0-100,分数越高表示后悔程度越高)和我们关于他们决策过程和结果的问题。后悔分数是每个独立决策和结果变量的函数。
总的来说,未割礼和已割礼父母群体的决策后悔评分呈正偏态分布,中位数为 0,平均值为 22,范围为 0 至 75。对于已割礼的(n=91),中位数后悔评分为 0(IQR 0-25)。对于未割礼的(n=28),中位数后悔评分为 0(IQR 0-24)。总的来说,55%的父母报告没有后悔(DRS=0),24%有轻度后悔(DRS 5-25),21%有中度至重度后悔(DRS 30-100)。那些感觉自己做出了明智决策或接受了任何医生建议的父母,其后悔分数较低。那些因为孩子未割礼或割礼的阴茎出现问题而来就诊的父母(DRS 评分为 37.5 和 25),其后悔分数较高。
我们发现,很大一部分父母对他们决定给孩子割礼或不割礼表示没有后悔(55%)。父母群体之间的中位数后悔评分也没有差异。然而,相当一部分父母确实表达了中度至重度的后悔(21%),并且有几个有影响力的因素与后悔评分相关。这些因素包括明智的决策、医生的建议、外观满意度以及与孩子割礼或未割礼的阴茎相关的问题。这些因素得到了其他使用 DRS 和人群研究的文献的支持。我们研究的局限性包括参与者的有限招募和潜在的时间相关的反应偏差。
在我们的小儿泌尿科诊所,五分之一的已割礼和未割礼男孩的父母对他们关于新生儿割礼的决定表示中度至重度后悔。我们的数据表明,在做出关于新生儿割礼的决定之前,确保父母得到充分的咨询非常重要。