Department of Surgery, University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Swiss Med Wkly. 2024 Jul 31;154:3549. doi: 10.57187/s.3549.
The term lymphadenopathy refers to an abnormality in size, consistency or morphological aspect of one or several lymph nodes. Although lymphadenopathies are commonly observed in everyday clinical practice, the difficulty of differentiating benign and malignant disease may delay therapeutic approaches. The present review aims to update diagnostic algorithms in different clinical situations based on the currently available literature. A literature review was performed to assess current knowledge of and to update the diagnostic approach. A short clinical vignette was used as an example of a typical clinical presentation. This case of metastatic lymphadenopathy with incomplete patient history demonstrates how misleading such lymphadenopathy may be, leading to a delayed diagnosis and even a fatal outcome. Any lymphadenopathy persisting for more than 2 weeks should be considered suspicious and deserves further investigation. Precise clinical examination, meticulous history-taking and a search for associated symptomatology are still cornerstones for diagnosing the origin of the condition. The next diagnostic step depends on the anatomical region and the specific patient's situation. Imaging starts with ultrasound, while computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allow assessment of the surrounding structures. If the diagnosis remains uncertain, tissue sampling and histological analyses should be performed. Except for head and neck loco-regional lymphadenopathy, there are no methodical guidelines for persistent lymphadenopathy. The present review clarifies several confusing and complex situations. The accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology could be increased by using core needle biopsy with immunocytologic and flow cytometric methods. Notably, except in the head and neck area, open biopsy remains the best option when lymphoma is suspected or when inconclusive results of previous fine needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy are obtained. The incidence of malignant lymphadenopathy varies with its location and the various diagnostic strategies. In metastatic lymphadenopathy of unknown primary origin, European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines and modern methods like next-generation sequencing (NGS) may help to manage such complex cases.
淋巴结病是指一个或多个淋巴结的大小、质地或形态异常。尽管淋巴结病在日常临床实践中很常见,但良性和恶性疾病的鉴别困难可能会延迟治疗方法。本综述旨在根据现有文献更新不同临床情况下的诊断算法。进行了文献回顾,以评估当前对诊断方法的认识并进行更新。使用简短的临床病例作为典型临床表现的示例。这个转移性淋巴结病的病例,由于病史不完整,说明了这种淋巴结病可能具有误导性,导致诊断延迟,甚至导致致命后果。任何持续超过 2 周的淋巴结病都应被视为可疑,并值得进一步调查。精确的临床检查、细致的病史采集和寻找相关症状仍然是诊断疾病来源的基石。下一步的诊断取决于解剖区域和特定患者的情况。影像学从超声开始,而计算机断层扫描 (CT) 和磁共振成像 (MRI) 则允许评估周围结构。如果诊断仍然不确定,则应进行组织取样和组织学分析。除了头颈部局部淋巴结病外,对于持续性淋巴结病没有系统的指南。本综述澄清了几种混淆和复杂的情况。通过使用免疫细胞化学和流式细胞术的核心针活检,可以提高细针抽吸细胞学的准确性。值得注意的是,除非在头颈部区域,否则当怀疑淋巴瘤或先前的细针抽吸细胞学或核心针活检结果不确定时,开放性活检仍然是最佳选择。恶性淋巴结病的发生率因位置和各种诊断策略而异。在不明原发灶的转移性淋巴结病中,欧洲肿瘤内科学会 (ESMO) 指南和下一代测序 (NGS) 等现代方法可能有助于处理此类复杂病例。