Department of Family Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Medical Education, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2392428. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2392428. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
Video-recordings review of patient encounters is reported to improve the clinical performance of medical students. However, evidence on specific remediation strategies or outcomes are lacking. We aimed to implement videorecording-based remediation of standardized patient encounters among medical students, combined with preceptor one-on-one feedback or peer group discussion, and evaluate the effectiveness of the two remediation methods using objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).
Following standardized patient encounters, 107 final-year medical students were divided into two groups based on different remediation methods of video review: (1) precepted video review with preceptor feedback ( = 55) and (2) private video review and subsequent peer group discussion under supervision ( = 52). All students underwent twelve-stations of OSCE both before and after the video review. Students' pre- and post-remediation OSCE scores, self-efficacy level in patient encounters, and level of educational satisfaction with each method were assessed and compared between different video-based remediation methods to evaluate their respective effects.
After remediation, the total and subcomponent OSCE scores, such as history taking, physical examination, and patient - physician interaction (PPI), among all students increased significantly. Post-remediation OSCE scores showed no significant difference between two remediation methods (preceptor module, 79.6 ± 4.3 vs. peer module, 79.4 ± 3.8 in the total OSCE score). Students' self-efficacy levels increased after remediation in both modules (both p-value <0.001), with no difference between the two modules. However, students' satisfaction level was higher in the preceptor module than in the peer module (80.1 ± 17.7 vs. 59.2 ± 25.1, p-value <0.001). Among students with poor baseline OSCE performance, a prominent increase in PPI scores was observed in the preceptor-based module.
Video-based remediation of patient encounters, either through preceptor review with one-on-one feedback or through private review with peer discussion, was equally effective in improving the OSCE scores and self-efficacy levels of medical students. Underperforming students can benefit from precepted video reviews for building PPI.
有报道称,对医患接触进行视频记录回顾可以提高医学生的临床表现。然而,缺乏具体的补救策略或结果的证据。我们旨在为医学生实施基于视频的标准化患者接触补救措施,结合导师一对一反馈或同伴小组讨论,并使用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)评估两种补救方法的有效性。
在标准化患者接触后,根据视频回顾的不同补救方法,将 107 名临床医学专业的五年级学生分为两组:(1)有导师反馈的监督视频回顾( = 55)和(2)私下视频回顾和随后在监督下的同伴小组讨论( = 52)。所有学生在视频回顾前后都进行了 12 站的 OSCE。评估和比较了不同视频补救方法之间学生的补救前和补救后 OSCE 分数、在患者接触中的自我效能水平以及对每种方法的教育满意度,以评估各自的效果。
补救后,所有学生的总 OSCE 分数和子成分分数(如病史采集、体格检查和医患互动(PPI))均显著提高。两种补救方法之间的补救后 OSCE 分数没有显著差异(导师模块为 79.6±4.3,同伴模块为 79.4±3.8)。在两个模块中,学生的自我效能水平在补救后都有所提高(两个模块的 p 值均<0.001),但两个模块之间没有差异。然而,学生对导师模块的满意度高于同伴模块(80.1±17.7 对 59.2±25.1,p 值<0.001)。在 OSCE 表现基线较差的学生中,在基于导师的模块中观察到 PPI 分数的显著提高。
通过导师审查的一对一反馈或通过私下审查和同伴讨论的方式对医患接触进行视频补救,在提高医学生的 OSCE 分数和自我效能水平方面同样有效。表现不佳的学生可以从导师监督的视频审查中受益,以建立 PPI。