Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Surg Res. 2024 Oct;302:437-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.079. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
Research in gender-affirming chest surgery has primarily compared cisgender versus transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people, without specifically addressing nonbinary people. This study will assess surgical complications between cisgender, transgender, and nonbinary adults undergoing breast reductions.
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases from 2015 to 2021 were used to identify TGD patients who underwent breast reduction (Current Procedural Terminology code: 19318) and cisgender patients who underwent this procedure for cosmesis or cancer prophylaxis. Analysis of variance tests, chi-squared tests, unpaired t-tests, and regression models compared complications among cisgender, transgender, and nonbinary patients.
A total of 1222 patients met the inclusion criteria: 380 (31.1%) were cisgender, 769 (62.9%) were transgender, and 73 (6.0%) were nonbinary. The proportion of TGD patients grew significantly relative to cisgender patients over the study period (P < 0.001). The overall all-cause complication rate was 3.4%, with 4.2% of cisgender, 1.4% of nonbinary, and 3.1% of transgender patients experiencing surgical complications. After adjusting for confounding variables, no statistically significant difference was observed in all-cause complication rates between the cohorts. In the sample, 19 transgender patients (2.5%) underwent reoperation. Transgender patients had a lower likelihood of wound complications (odds ratio: 0.172; 95% confidence interval: 0.035-0.849; P = 0.031) compared to cisgender patients and nonbinary patients. None of the patients experienced a severe systemic complication.
The findings emphasize the growing demand and safety of gender-affirming breast reductions. They underscore the importance of continued research and tailored approaches to delivering care to nonbinary and transgender patients, addressing their diverse needs and improving access to gender-affirming surgeries.
性别肯定胸部手术的研究主要比较了顺性别与跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)人群,而没有专门针对非二元性别者。本研究将评估接受乳房缩小术的顺性别、跨性别和非二元成年人的手术并发症。
使用 2015 年至 2021 年期间的国家手术质量改进计划数据库,确定接受乳房缩小术(当前程序术语代码:19318)的 TGD 患者和为美容或预防癌症而接受此手术的顺性别患者。方差分析、卡方检验、未配对 t 检验和回归模型比较了顺性别、跨性别和非二元患者的并发症。
共有 1222 名患者符合纳入标准:380 名(31.1%)为顺性别,769 名(62.9%)为跨性别,73 名(6.0%)为非二元性别。与顺性别患者相比,TGD 患者的比例在研究期间显著增加(P<0.001)。总体所有原因并发症发生率为 3.4%,顺性别患者的发生率为 4.2%,非二元性别患者为 1.4%,跨性别患者为 3.1%。在调整混杂变量后,各队列之间的所有原因并发症发生率无统计学差异。在该样本中,有 19 名跨性别患者(2.5%)接受了再次手术。与顺性别患者和非二元性别患者相比,跨性别患者发生伤口并发症的可能性较低(比值比:0.172;95%置信区间:0.035-0.849;P=0.031)。没有患者发生严重的全身并发症。
这些发现强调了性别肯定乳房缩小术的需求不断增长和安全性。它们强调了继续研究和制定针对非二元和跨性别患者的护理方法的重要性,以满足他们的多样化需求并改善获得性别肯定手术的机会。