Kang Min-Gu, Baek Ji Yeon, Jo Yunju, Ryu Dongryeol, Jang Il-Young, Jung Hee-Won, Kim Beom-Jun
Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Bitgoeul Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024 Oct;15(5):2134-2142. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13561. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
Uric acid (UA), the terminal breakdown product of purine metabolism, possesses contradictory roles, functioning both as an inflammatory mediator and as an antioxidant. Its clinical relevance, particularly in geriatric populations, remains a topic of ongoing debate. Aiming to elucidate whether circulating UA is detrimental or beneficial to human health, we investigate the association between serum UA concentrations and the frailty index-a comprehensive measure of biological aging in a nationally representative cohort of community-dwelling older adults.
We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study utilizing data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The sample included 4268 participants aged 65 years and above. A deficit accumulation frailty index (FI) was constructed using 38 items that assess physical, cognitive, psychological, and social domains. Based on the FI, participants were categorized into non-frail (FI ≤ 0.15), pre-frail (0.15 < FI ≤ 0.25), or frail (FI > 0.25). Serum UA levels were quantified through a colorimetric enzymatic assay.
After controlling for confounders such as age, sex, socioeconomic status (including income and education level), lifestyle factors (smoking status), and medical history (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, stroke, cardiovascular diseases), and body mass index, serum UA levels were observed to be significantly higher in frail participants compared with their non-frail counterparts (P < 0.001). Furthermore, serum UA concentrations demonstrated a positive correlation with the FI (P < 0.001), and the odds ratio for frailty per 1 mg/dL increase in serum UA was 1.22 (P < 0.001). Additionally, older adults in the highest quartile of UA levels exhibited a significantly higher FI and 1.66-fold increased odds of frailty compared with those in the lowest quartile (P = 0.011 and P = 0.005, respectively).
These findings suggest that elevated circulating UA levels may act as a pro-aging factor rather than an anti-aging one in older adults, highlighting its potential role in accelerating biological aging. The data further support the utility of serum UA as a potential blood-based biomarker for frailty in this demographic, contributing to the expanding evidence on its significance in geriatric health assessments.
尿酸(UA)是嘌呤代谢的终末分解产物,具有相互矛盾的作用,既是一种炎症介质,又是一种抗氧化剂。其临床相关性,尤其是在老年人群中,仍然是一个持续争论的话题。为了阐明循环尿酸对人类健康是有害还是有益,我们在一个具有全国代表性的社区居住老年人队列中,研究血清尿酸浓度与衰弱指数(一种生物衰老的综合指标)之间的关联。
我们利用韩国国家健康与营养检查调查的数据进行了一项基于人群的横断面研究。样本包括4268名65岁及以上的参与者。使用38个评估身体、认知、心理和社会领域的项目构建了一个缺陷累积衰弱指数(FI)。根据FI,参与者被分为非衰弱(FI≤0.15)、衰弱前期(0.15<FI≤0.25)或衰弱(FI>0.25)。通过比色酶法对血清尿酸水平进行定量。
在控制了年龄、性别、社会经济地位(包括收入和教育水平)、生活方式因素(吸烟状况)、病史(高血压、糖尿病、血脂异常、中风、心血管疾病)和体重指数等混杂因素后,观察到衰弱参与者的血清尿酸水平显著高于非衰弱参与者(P<0.001)。此外,血清尿酸浓度与FI呈正相关(P<0.001),血清尿酸每升高1mg/dL,衰弱的比值比为1.22(P<0.001)。此外,尿酸水平最高四分位数的老年人与最低四分位数的老年人相比,FI显著更高,衰弱几率增加1.66倍(分别为P = 0.011和P = 0.005)。
这些发现表明,在老年人中,循环尿酸水平升高可能是一种促衰老因素而非抗衰老因素,突出了其在加速生物衰老中的潜在作用。数据进一步支持血清尿酸作为该人群衰弱潜在的血液生物标志物的效用,为其在老年健康评估中的重要性提供了越来越多的证据。