方案变量对健康个体中星标偏移平衡测试组（SEBT、mSEBT、YBT-LQ）结果的影响：一项系统评价
Influence of protocol variables on outcomes of the star excursion balance test group (SEBT, mSEBT, YBT-LQ) in healthy individuals: a systematic review.
作者信息
Zając Bartosz, Olszewski Maciej, Mika Anna
机构信息
Laboratory of Functional Diagnostics, Central Scientific and Research Laboratory, University of Physical Education in Kraków, Kraków, Poland.
Doctoral School, University of Physical Education in Kraków, Kraków, Poland.
出版信息
Front Physiol. 2024 Aug 2;15:1415887. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1415887. eCollection 2024.
BACKGROUND
The "SEBT group," which includes the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), its modified version (mSEBT), and the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ), is used to assess the limits of stability. Interestingly, the testing protocol allows users a considerable degree of flexibility, which can affect the obtained results. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review was to analyze the impact of different protocol variants within the "SEBT group" on outcomes.
METHODS
Data were acquired by searching 4 databases (MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Wiley, Springer Link) focusing on studies published in English in peer-reviewed journals, empirical in nature, conducted on healthy individuals, and examining the effects of various protocol variants on test outcomes. Study quality was assessed with the NHLBI quality assessment tool for pre-post studies with no control group.
RESULTS
The calculation method based on the maximum repetition yields statistically significantly higher results compared to other calculation methods. Allowing unrestricted arm movements during the test results in statistically significantly higher scores compared to the procedure that restricts arm movements. The impact of a warm-up, wearing footwear during testing, and using a dedicated kit remains ambiguous. To obtain reliable results, 4-6 familiarization trials are necessary, though fewer may suffice for athletes experienced in performing the test.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review highlights the significant impact of the calculation method and arm movement restrictions on the outcomes of the "SEBT group." The effects of wearing footwear during testing, warm-up, and using a dedicated test kit remain unclear. The required number of familiarization repetitions may varies depending on biological maturity level of the person being tested. Future research should develop a warm-up protocol tailored to the needs of the "SEBT group," and investigate the impact of heel elevation during testing on outcomes.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
The protocol for this systematic review was prospectively registered in the OSF Registries (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JSKH2).
背景
“星标偏移平衡测试组”包括星标偏移平衡测试（SEBT）、其改良版本（mSEBT）以及下肢Y平衡测试（YBT-LQ），用于评估稳定性极限。有趣的是，测试方案给予使用者相当大的灵活性，这可能会影响所获得的结果。因此，本系统评价的目的是分析“星标偏移平衡测试组”内不同方案变体对测试结果的影响。
方法
通过检索4个数据库（MEDLINE、ScienceDirect、Wiley、Springer Link）获取数据，重点关注在同行评审期刊上发表的英文研究，这些研究本质上是实证性的，针对健康个体进行，并研究各种方案变体对测试结果的影响。使用美国国立心肺血液研究所（NHLBI）无对照组前后研究质量评估工具评估研究质量。
结果
与其他计算方法相比，基于最大重复次数的计算方法在统计学上产生的结果显著更高。与限制手臂运动的程序相比，测试期间允许无限制的手臂运动在统计学上产生的分数显著更高。热身、测试期间穿着鞋子以及使用专用套件的影响仍不明确。为了获得可靠的结果，需要进行4 - 6次熟悉试验，不过对于有该测试经验的运动员，次数可能少一些就足够了。
结论
本系统评价强调了计算方法和手臂运动限制对“星标偏移平衡测试组”测试结果的重大影响。测试期间穿着鞋子、热身以及使用专用测试套件的影响仍不清楚。所需的熟悉重复次数可能因被测试者的生物成熟水平而异。未来的研究应制定适合“星标偏移平衡测试组”需求的热身方案，并研究测试期间足跟抬高对测试结果的影响。
系统评价注册
本系统评价的方案已在开放科学框架（OSF）注册中心（https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JSKH2）进行前瞻性注册。
Zotero 插件