• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助不停跳全胸腔镜冠状动脉搭桥术中双侧胸廓内动脉移植:10年结果

Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: 10-year outcomes.

作者信息

Nisivaco Sarah, Bhasin Riya, Kitahara Hiroto, Patel Brooke, Coleman Charocka, Grady Kaitlyn, Oh Won Hee, Balkhy Husam H

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 31;13(4):354-363. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-rcabg-0016. Epub 2024 Jul 18.

DOI:10.21037/acs-2024-rcabg-0016
PMID:39157183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11327409/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multi-arterial grafting (MAG) with bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITAs) is superior to single internal thoracic artery (ITA) and veins, however, sternal wound infection (SWI) is a deterrent to using BITA, especially in diabetic and obese patients. Sternal-sparing approaches, including robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB), may mitigate this risk. We reviewed outcomes of robotic TECAB with BITA grafting.

METHODS

A total of 871 patients underwent robotic TECAB at our institution from 7/2013 to 4/2024. Of these, 406 patients received BITA grafts and are the subject of this review. Early and mid-term clinical outcomes were reviewed and angiographic patency in those undergoing hybrid revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after TECAB. All cases were performed via a beating-heart robotic approach, with standard TECAB port placement.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 67±9 years and 16% were female. The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk was 1.47%±2.2%. Thirty-nine percent were diabetic (15% insulin-dependent) and 39% had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m. Twenty percent had an ejection fraction (EF) ≤40%. Ninety-eight percent of cases were completed off-pump and there were no conversions to sternotomy. The mean number of grafts per patient was 2.2±0.4. The mean intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) were 1.22±0.62 and 2.44±0.83 days, respectively. Postoperative complications included atrial fibrillation in 13%, acute kidney injury (AKI) in 3.4%, return to theatre for bleeding in 0.7%, postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) in 0.2%, and stroke in 0.2%. Thirty-day mortality was 1.2% [observed/expected (O/E): 0.89]. Return to full activities and work occurred at mean of 14±8.6 and 17±13 days, respectively. Two hundred and two patients (50%) had 'advanced' hybrid revascularization (with at least two arterial grafts and stents). ITA early graft patency in this cohort of patients was 271/278 (98%) with 100% left ITA to left anterior descending artery (LITA-LAD) patency. Mid-term follow-up was complete in all patients at mean of 51±36 months (longest follow-up at 10 years). All-cause mortality was 13% and cardiac-mortality was 2.5%. Freedom from angina was 96%, and freedom from repeat revascularization was 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the beating-heart robotic TECAB approach facilitates BITA grafting to achieve multi-vessel arterial revascularization of the left coronary system, with excellent 10-year outcomes.

摘要

背景

双侧胸廓内动脉(BITA)的多动脉移植(MAG)优于单根胸廓内动脉(ITA)和静脉移植,然而,胸骨伤口感染(SWI)是使用BITA的一个阻碍因素,尤其是在糖尿病和肥胖患者中。保留胸骨的手术方法,包括机器人完全内镜冠状动脉搭桥术(TECAB),可能会降低这种风险。我们回顾了机器人BITA移植TECAB的结果。

方法

2013年7月至2024年4月期间,共有871例患者在我院接受了机器人TECAB手术。其中,406例患者接受了BITA移植,为本综述的研究对象。回顾了早期和中期临床结果,以及TECAB术后接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的混合血运重建患者的血管造影通畅情况。所有病例均采用心脏跳动机器人手术方法,采用标准TECAB端口放置。

结果

该队列患者的平均年龄为67±9岁,16%为女性。胸外科医师协会(STS)平均风险为1.47%±2.2%。39%为糖尿病患者(15%依赖胰岛素),39%的体重指数(BMI)≥30kg/m²。20%的患者射血分数(EF)≤40%。98%的病例在非体外循环下完成,无一例转为胸骨切开术。每位患者的平均移植血管数为2.2±0.4。重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间(LOS)的平均值分别为1.22±0.62天和2.44±0.83天。术后并发症包括13%的心房颤动、3.4%的急性肾损伤(AKI)、0.7%的因出血返回手术室、0.2%的术后心肌梗死(MI)和0.2%的中风。30天死亡率为1.2%[观察到的/预期的(O/E):0.89]。恢复完全活动和工作的平均时间分别为14±8.6天和17±13天。202例(50%)患者进行了“高级”混合血运重建(至少有两根动脉移植血管和支架)。该队列患者的ITA早期移植血管通畅率为271/278(98%),左ITA至左前降支动脉(LITA-LAD)通畅率为100%。所有患者均完成了平均51±36个月的中期随访(最长随访10年)。全因死亡率为13%,心脏死亡率为2.5%。无心绞痛发生率为96%,无再次血运重建发生率为94%。

结论

采用心脏跳动机器人TECAB手术方法有助于BITA移植,以实现左冠状动脉系统的多支动脉血运重建,10年结果优异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b833/11327409/9996d3b22084/acs-13-04-354-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b833/11327409/3bfb06ad517d/acs-13-04-354-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b833/11327409/9806f707898e/acs-13-04-354-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b833/11327409/4623958877c9/acs-13-04-354-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b833/11327409/9996d3b22084/acs-13-04-354-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b833/11327409/3bfb06ad517d/acs-13-04-354-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b833/11327409/9806f707898e/acs-13-04-354-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b833/11327409/4623958877c9/acs-13-04-354-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b833/11327409/9996d3b22084/acs-13-04-354-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: 10-year outcomes.机器人辅助不停跳全胸腔镜冠状动脉搭桥术中双侧胸廓内动脉移植:10年结果
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 31;13(4):354-363. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-rcabg-0016. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
2
Robotic advanced hybrid coronary revascularization: Outcomes with two internal thoracic artery grafts and stents.机器人辅助高级杂交冠状动脉血运重建术:使用两支胸廓内动脉移植物和支架的结果
JTCVS Tech. 2022 Aug 27;16:76-88. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.08.012. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization: Early Outcomes and Midterm Follow-Up in Patients Undergoing Single or Multivessel Robotic TECAB and PCI.杂交冠状动脉血运重建:行单支或多支机器人 TECAB 与 PCI 患者的早期结果和中期随访。
Innovations (Phila). 2022 Nov-Dec;17(6):513-520. doi: 10.1177/15569845221137349. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
4
Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Bypass to the Left Anterior Descending Artery: Left Versus Right Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts.机器人全内窥镜冠状动脉旁路移植术至左前降支:左内乳动脉与右内乳动脉桥。
J Surg Res. 2023 Nov;291:139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.04.030. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
5
[Short-term follow-up results of hybrid coronary revascularization by robotic coronary artery bypass grafting and stent implantation].[机器人冠状动脉搭桥术与支架植入杂交冠状动脉血运重建的短期随访结果]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2015 Aug;35(8):1166-9.
6
A decade of robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary bypass (TECAB) at a single institution: Outcomes with 10-year follow-up.单一机构开展机器人辅助不停跳完全内镜下冠状动脉搭桥术(TECAB)十年:10年随访结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jun;169(6):1753-1760.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.07.060. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
7
Angiographic patency after robotic beating heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting facilitated by automated distal anastomotic connectors.机器人跳动心脏全内镜冠状动脉旁路移植术后血管造影通畅率得益于自动化远端吻合连接器。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Oct 1;31(4):467-474. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa149.
8
Robotic off-pump totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass in the current era: report of 544 patients.机器人非体外循环全内镜冠状动脉旁路移植术在当前时代的应用:544 例患者报告。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jan 24;61(2):439-446. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab378.
9
Early clinical and angiographic outcomes after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery.机器人辅助冠状动脉旁路手术后的早期临床和血管造影结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
10
Robotic Coronary Revascularization is Feasible and Safe: 10-year Single-Center Experience.机器人冠状动脉血运重建术可行且安全:单中心10年经验
Heart Views. 2022 Oct-Dec;23(4):195-200. doi: 10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_53_22. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Skeletonized versus Pedicled harvesting of internal mammary artery: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.骨化与蒂状采集内乳动脉:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Jan;49(1 Pt B):102160. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102160. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
2
Very Long-term Outcome of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Reconstructed Time-To-Event Meta-analysis.糖尿病患者双侧胸廓内动脉的长期预后:系统评价与重构的事件时间荟萃分析
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2024 Jan;49(1 Pt C):102135. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102135. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Minimally invasive multivessel coronary grafting using a robotic totally endoscopic approach.
机器人全内镜微创多支冠状动脉搭桥术。
Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Oct 12;2023. doi: 10.1510/mmcts.2023.065.
4
Coronary artery bypass grafting using bilateral internal thoracic arteries in patients with diabetes and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病和肥胖患者使用双侧胸廓内动脉进行冠状动脉旁路移植术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2023 Jul 15;47:101235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2023.101235. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Bypass to the Left Anterior Descending Artery: Left Versus Right Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts.机器人全内窥镜冠状动脉旁路移植术至左前降支:左内乳动脉与右内乳动脉桥。
J Surg Res. 2023 Nov;291:139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.04.030. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
6
Multiple arterial versus single arterial grafting in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.糖尿病患者冠状动脉搭桥手术中多支动脉与单支动脉移植的比较。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Jan 28;13:119-135. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.01.010. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Long-Term Survival of Multiple Versus Single Arterial Coronary Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients.老年患者多支与单支冠状动脉搭桥术的长期生存情况
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 30;12(7):2594. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072594.
8
Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries Improve 10-Year Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.双侧内乳动脉改善冠状动脉旁路移植术 10 年结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Jul;116(1):52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.02.035. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
9
Robotic advanced hybrid coronary revascularization: Outcomes with two internal thoracic artery grafts and stents.机器人辅助高级杂交冠状动脉血运重建术:使用两支胸廓内动脉移植物和支架的结果
JTCVS Tech. 2022 Aug 27;16:76-88. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.08.012. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Differences in long-term survival outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting using single vs multiple arterial grafts: a meta-analysis with reconstructed time-to-event data and subgroup analyses.单支与多支动脉旁路移植术治疗冠状动脉旁路移植术后长期生存结局的差异:一项使用重建时间事件数据和亚组分析的荟萃分析。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Feb;71(2):77-89. doi: 10.1007/s11748-022-01891-7. Epub 2022 Nov 17.