• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

龋齿分级:算法可靠性及与专家评估一致性的比较

Dental Cavity Grading: Comparing Algorithm Reliability and Agreement with Expert Evaluation.

作者信息

Qutieshat Abubaker, Salem Abdurahman, Kyranides Melina N

机构信息

Adult Restorative Dentistry Oman Dental College, Muscat, Oman.

Restorative Dentistry Dental School University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Int J Dent. 2024 Aug 10;2024:3965641. doi: 10.1155/2024/3965641. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1155/2024/3965641
PMID:39157299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11330331/
Abstract

AIM

The current study introduces a novel, algorithm-based software developed to objectively evaluate dental cavity preparations. The software aims to provide an alternative or complement to traditional, subjective assessment methods used in operative dentistry education.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The software was tested on cavity preparations carried out by 70 participants on artificial molar teeth. These cavities were also independently assessed by an experienced academic panel. The software, using 3D imaging, calculated cavity dimensions and assigned an error score based on deviation from ideal measurements. Statistical analyses included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Cohen's kappa, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC3k), Spearman's rho, Kendall's tau correlation coefficients, and a confusion matrix.

RESULT

The software demonstrated a high degree of accuracy and agreement with the panel assessments. The average software and panel scores were 64.1 and 60.91, respectively. Sensitivity (0.98) was high, specificity (0.55) was moderate, and the ICC3k value (0.857) indicated a strong agreement between the software and the panel. Further, Spearman's rho (0.73) and Kendall's tau (0.56) suggested a strong correlation between the two grading methods.

CONCLUSION

The results support the algorithm-based software as a valid and reliable tool for dental cavity preparation assessments. The software's potential use in dental education is promising, though future research is necessary to validate and optimize this technology for wider application.

摘要

目的

本研究介绍了一种新开发的基于算法的软件,用于客观评估牙洞预备情况。该软件旨在为牙体牙髓病学教育中使用的传统主观评估方法提供替代或补充。

材料与方法

该软件在70名参与者对人工磨牙进行的牙洞预备上进行了测试。这些牙洞也由一个经验丰富的学术小组进行了独立评估。该软件利用三维成像技术计算牙洞尺寸,并根据与理想测量值的偏差给出误差分数。统计分析包括敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、科恩kappa系数、组内相关系数(ICC3k)、斯皮尔曼等级相关系数、肯德尔等级相关系数以及混淆矩阵。

结果

该软件与小组评估显示出高度的准确性和一致性。软件和小组的平均分数分别为64.1和60.91。敏感性(0.98)较高,特异性(0.55)中等,ICC3k值(0.857)表明软件与小组之间有很强的一致性。此外,斯皮尔曼等级相关系数(0.73)和肯德尔等级相关系数(0.56)表明两种分级方法之间有很强的相关性。

结论

结果支持基于算法的软件作为牙洞预备评估的有效且可靠工具。该软件在牙科教育中的潜在应用前景广阔,不过未来还需要进行研究以验证和优化这项技术,使其能更广泛地应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/91b77d044d8f/IJD2024-3965641.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/6222942c4f38/IJD2024-3965641.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/632cf7e0c514/IJD2024-3965641.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/bed9cbb8df20/IJD2024-3965641.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/9c599e4deb6a/IJD2024-3965641.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/a98d7d511709/IJD2024-3965641.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/022329df396b/IJD2024-3965641.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/91b77d044d8f/IJD2024-3965641.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/6222942c4f38/IJD2024-3965641.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/632cf7e0c514/IJD2024-3965641.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/bed9cbb8df20/IJD2024-3965641.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/9c599e4deb6a/IJD2024-3965641.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/a98d7d511709/IJD2024-3965641.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/022329df396b/IJD2024-3965641.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e01a/11330331/91b77d044d8f/IJD2024-3965641.007.jpg

相似文献

1
Dental Cavity Grading: Comparing Algorithm Reliability and Agreement with Expert Evaluation.龋齿分级:算法可靠性及与专家评估一致性的比较
Int J Dent. 2024 Aug 10;2024:3965641. doi: 10.1155/2024/3965641. eCollection 2024.
2
Observer reliability of arteriovenous malformations grading scales using current imaging modalities.利用当前成像方式评估动静脉畸形分级量表的观察者间可靠性。
J Neurosurg. 2014 May;120(5):1179-87. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.JNS131262. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
3
Design of an interactive system for access cavity assessment: A novel feedback tool for preclinical endodontics.
Eur J Dent Educ. 2023 Nov;27(4):1031-1039. doi: 10.1111/eje.12895. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
4
Utilising an innovative digital software to grade pre-clinical crown preparation exercise.利用创新的数字软件对临床前牙冠预备练习进行评分。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2017 Nov;21(4):220-227. doi: 10.1111/eje.12204. Epub 2016 May 5.
5
Inter- and Intrarater Reliability Using Different Software Versions of E4D Compare in Dental Education.在牙科教育中使用不同软件版本的E4D进行评分者间和评分者内信度比较
J Dent Educ. 2015 Jun;79(6):711-8.
6
Secondary Caries Detection and Treatment Decision according to Two Criteria and the Impact of a Three-Dimensional Intraoral Scanner on Gap Evaluation.根据两项标准进行继发龋的检测和治疗决策,以及三维口腔内扫描仪对间隙评估的影响。
Caries Res. 2023;57(2):141-151. doi: 10.1159/000527292. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
7
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool: reliability and validity evidence.胃肠道内镜能力评估工具:可靠性和有效性证据。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1417-1424.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.030. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
8
Evaluating the efficiency of the Dental Teacher system as a digital preclinical teaching tool.评估牙科教师系统作为数字化临床前教学工具的效率。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2018 Aug;22(3):e619-e623. doi: 10.1111/eje.12365. Epub 2018 May 23.
9
Grading Class I Preparations in Preclinical Dental Education: E4D Compare Software vs. the Traditional Standard.临床前牙科教育中I类预备体的分级:E4D比较软件与传统标准
J Dent Educ. 2017 Dec;81(12):1457-1462. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.107.
10
Pediatric airway study: Endoscopic grading system for quantifying tonsillar size in comparison to standard adenotonsillar grading systems.儿科气道研究:与标准腺样体扁桃体分级系统相比的扁桃体大小量化内镜分级系统。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2018 Jan-Feb;39(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of CAD/CAM technology in dental procedures performed by students: A systematic scoping review of randomized clinical trials.计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)技术在学生进行的牙科手术中的疗效:一项随机临床试验的系统综述。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 9;9(4):e15322. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15322. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Computer-assisted evaluation and feedback of a complete student class for preclinical tooth preparation.
J Dent Educ. 2023 Dec;87 Suppl 3:1776-1779. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13183. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
3
Design of an interactive system for access cavity assessment: A novel feedback tool for preclinical endodontics.
Eur J Dent Educ. 2023 Nov;27(4):1031-1039. doi: 10.1111/eje.12895. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
4
Comparison of digital and conventional assessment methods for a single tooth preparation and educational satisfaction.单颗牙齿预备的数字与传统评估方法及教育满意度比较
Eur J Dent Educ. 2023 May;27(2):262-270. doi: 10.1111/eje.12799. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
5
Potential of intraoral optical scanning to evaluate motor skills' improvement for tooth preparation: A prospective cohort study.口腔内光学扫描评估牙体预备后运动技能改善的潜力:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2022 Nov;26(4):669-675. doi: 10.1111/eje.12745. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
6
Automatic Evaluation of Crown Preparation Using Image Processing Techniques: A Substitute to Faculty Scoring in Dental Education.使用图像处理技术自动评估牙冠预备:牙科教育中教师评分的替代方法
J Med Signals Sens. 2020 Nov 11;10(4):239-248. doi: 10.4103/jmss.JMSS_5_20. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
7
Personality, learning styles and handedness: The use of the non-dominant hand in pre-clinical operative dentistry training.个性、学习风格和利手:非优势手在临床前口腔操作训练中的应用。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2021 May;25(2):397-404. doi: 10.1111/eje.12616. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
8
Digital assessment of a retentive full crown preparation-An evaluation of prepCheck in an undergraduate pre-clinical teaching environment.数字化评估全冠修复体预备——预备检查在本科生临床前教学环境中的评估。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2020 Aug;24(3):407-424. doi: 10.1111/eje.12516. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
9
A comparison of crown preparation grading via PrepCheck versus grading by dental school instructors.通过PrepCheck进行的牙冠预备分级与牙科学校教师分级的比较。
Int J Comput Dent. 2018;21(4):305-311.
10
Grading Class I Preparations in Preclinical Dental Education: E4D Compare Software vs. the Traditional Standard.临床前牙科教育中I类预备体的分级:E4D比较软件与传统标准
J Dent Educ. 2017 Dec;81(12):1457-1462. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.107.