Suppr超能文献

急性髓系白血病患者骨髓和外周血样本在细胞异质性和体外药物敏感性方面的异同。

Similarities and differences of bone marrow and peripheral blood samples from acute myeloid leukemia patients in terms of cellular heterogeneity and ex-vivo drug sensitivity.

作者信息

Caliskan Gulser, Pawitan Yudi, Vu Trung Nghia

机构信息

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.

出版信息

EJHaem. 2024 Jun 17;5(4):721-727. doi: 10.1002/jha2.961. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow (BM) evaluation is the de facto standard for diagnosis, molecular analysis, risk stratification, and therapy response assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but in patients with a high number of circulating blast cells, the peripheral blood (PB) sample could provide similar information as BM. However, there is no large-scale molecular study comparing the two specimens in terms of their gene expression profiles, cellular heterogeneities, and ex-vivo drug sensitivity.

METHODOLOGY

We used (i) the BEAT-AML cohort each with detailed molecular data; (ii) cell-type deconvolution to estimate leukemic and immune cell proportions between specimen types; (iii) differential expression (DE) and drug-cell type association analysis; and (iv) logistic regression models to assess the association between induction therapy response, cell-type composition and first-line drug treatment.

RESULTS

Results: We identified 207 patients having BM and 116 patients having PB samples. There was a total of 1271 DE genes (false discovery rate < 0.05) between BM and PB; the top enriched pathways in terms of DE genes belong to the immune system pathways. Aggregated ex-vivo drug response profiles from the two specimens were largely similar, as were the cellular components, except for the GMP-like cell type (17% in BM vs. 5% in PB, -value = 2 × 10). Among the specimen-specific results, the GMP-like subtype was associated with multiple drug resistance in BM and the ProMono-like subtype in PB. Several cell types were associated with the response to induction therapy, but the impact of specimen type on the interaction of cell type and cytarabine-associated induction therapy was not statistically significant for most cell types.

RESULTS

Conclusions: Even though there are molecular and cellular differences between BM and PB samples, they show many similarities in ex-vivo drug response profiles, indicating the clinical utility of the substantially less-invasive PB samples.

摘要

背景

骨髓(BM)评估是急性髓系白血病(AML)诊断、分子分析、风险分层及治疗反应评估的实际标准,但对于循环原始细胞数量较多的患者,外周血(PB)样本可提供与骨髓类似的信息。然而,尚无大规模分子研究在基因表达谱、细胞异质性及体外药物敏感性方面比较这两种样本。

方法

我们使用了(i)具有详细分子数据的BEAT-AML队列;(ii)细胞类型反卷积来估计不同样本类型之间白血病细胞和免疫细胞的比例;(iii)差异表达(DE)和药物-细胞类型关联分析;以及(iv)逻辑回归模型来评估诱导治疗反应、细胞类型组成与一线药物治疗之间的关联。

结果

我们确定了207例有骨髓样本的患者和116例有外周血样本的患者。骨髓和外周血之间共有1271个差异表达基因(错误发现率<0.05);差异表达基因富集程度最高的通路属于免疫系统通路。除类巨核祖细胞(GMP)样细胞类型外,两种样本的体外药物反应概况总体相似,细胞成分也是如此(骨髓中为17%,外周血中为5%,P值=2×10)。在样本特异性结果中,类GMP样亚型与骨髓中的多药耐药相关,外周血中的原单核细胞样亚型相关。几种细胞类型与诱导治疗反应相关,但对于大多数细胞类型,样本类型对细胞类型与阿糖胞苷相关诱导治疗相互作用的影响无统计学意义。

结论

尽管骨髓和外周血样本之间存在分子和细胞差异,但它们在体外药物反应概况上显示出许多相似之处,表明侵入性小得多的外周血样本具有临床实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df4f/11327724/82281156eb88/JHA2-5-721-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验