Suppr超能文献

药学技术人员的分级许可:高级药学技术人员(APhT)许可证是州监管机构的典范吗?

Tiered Licensure for Pharmacy Technicians: Is the Advanced Pharmacy Technician (APhT) License the Model for State Regulators?

作者信息

Adams Alex J, Frost Timothy P

机构信息

Idaho Division of Financial Management, Eagle, ID, USA.

Cicero Institute, Boise, ID, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Technol. 2024 Aug;40(4):202-206. doi: 10.1177/87551225241247687. Epub 2024 May 6.

Abstract

Two states-Connecticut and New Hampshire-have created or attempted to create advanced pharmacy technician (APhT) licenses. Both licenses, proposed and actual, have high barriers to entry, such as requiring 1 to 3 years of prior technician experience and passage of various assessments or trainings, such as a state-specific jurisprudence exam. Those obtaining APhT licensure are granted additional authority, such as performing final product verification (e.g., tech-check-tech) and vaccine administration. Compared with practices in other states, the APhT role in CT and NH provides minimal scope gains relative to the requirements imposed; as a result, there has been limited uptake (<1%) among current technicians. As such, it appears unlikely that tiered licensure for technicians will be the preferred mechanism for states to expand the role of pharmacy technicians in the future.

摘要

康涅狄格州和新罕布什尔州这两个州已经创建或试图创建高级药剂技术员(APhT)执照。无论是提议的还是实际的执照,都有很高的准入门槛,例如要求有1至3年的技术员工作经验,并通过各种评估或培训,如特定州的法理学考试。获得APhT执照的人被赋予了额外的权力,如进行最终产品验证(如技术人员互查)和疫苗接种。与其他州的做法相比,康涅狄格州和新罕布什尔州的APhT角色相对于所施加的要求而言,在职责范围上的提升微乎其微;因此,目前的技术员中对此的接受程度有限(<1%)。如此看来,技术员分级执照不太可能成为各州未来扩大药剂技术员职责的首选机制。

相似文献

8
Relationship between regulatory barriers to entry and pharmacy technician wages.监管进入壁垒与药剂师工资之间的关系。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Feb;16(2):190-194. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 17.
9
Advancing technician practice: Deliberations of a regulatory board.推进技师实践:监管委员会的审议。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Jan;14(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

本文引用的文献

1
How to implement a "standard of care" regulatory model for pharmacists.如何为药剂师实施“护理标准”监管模式。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2024 May-Jun;64(3):102034. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.02.007. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
4
Revisiting the continuum of pharmacist prescriptive authority.重新审视药剂师处方权的连续统一体。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023 Sep-Oct;63(5):1508-1514. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.06.025. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
6
Pharmacy technician-administered immunizations: A five-year review.药剂师管理下的免疫接种:五年回顾。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Mar-Apr;62(2):419-423. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
7
Could Digital Image Prescriptions Enhance Patient Care?数字图像处方能否提升患者护理质量?
J Pharm Technol. 2021 Jun;37(3):167-168. doi: 10.1177/8755122520982286. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验