Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.
Pharmaceutical Affairs, Dammam Medical Complex, Eastern Health Cluster, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 1;30(5):324-334. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_101_24. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
Crohn's disease (CD) is a debilitating gastrointestinal disease with complex etiology. Although effective, recipients of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents may experience primary or secondary nonresponse, necessitating alternative treatments. This study is intended to compare the short-term effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in treating CD after failure of multiple lines of anti-TNF therapy using real-world data.
A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, including adults (≥18 years old) with CD who did not respond to anti-TNF therapy. Primary endpoints were clinical improvement per the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) scores and remission at 12 weeks on an ordinal outcome scale. Secondary endpoints included clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission; clinical response; corticosteroid-free days; and cumulative steroid dose. Proportional odds and logistic regression Bayesian models were used to analyze outcomes, and the probability of treatment effectiveness was calculated from the posterior distribution.
The study included 101 patients (ustekinumab, n = 71 and vedolizumab, n = 30) with a median age of 32 years (IQR: 26.0-38.0); 54.4% were male. At 12 weeks, the HBI endpoint showed an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-1.31), favoring ustekinumab, with a 75% probability of treatment effectiveness over vedolizumab. The clinical ordinal scale had an aOR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.26-1.35) with a 73% probability of effectiveness for ustekinumab. Ustekinumab was also associated with favorable outcomes in secondary endpoints, reaching up to a 90% probability of effectiveness.
In CD patients with anti-TNF failure, ustekinumab was more effective than vedolizumab in the short term. These real-world insights contribute to understanding CD management but require validation in larger prospective studies and randomized controlled trials.
克罗恩病(CD)是一种具有复杂病因的使人虚弱的胃肠道疾病。尽管有效,但抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)药物的接受者可能会出现原发性或继发性无反应,需要替代治疗。本研究旨在使用真实世界的数据比较乌司奴单抗和维得利珠单抗在 TNF 治疗失败后的 CD 患者中的短期疗效。
在沙特阿拉伯达曼的一家三级医院进行了一项回顾性研究,包括对 TNF 治疗无反应的成年(≥18 岁)CD 患者。主要终点是根据 Harvey-Bradshaw 指数(HBI)评分的临床改善和在序贯量表上的 12 周缓解。次要终点包括临床、生化和内镜缓解;临床缓解;无皮质类固醇天数;和累积皮质类固醇剂量。比例优势和逻辑回归贝叶斯模型用于分析结果,并从后验分布计算治疗效果的概率。
该研究包括 101 名患者(乌司奴单抗,n = 71 名;维得利珠单抗,n = 30 名),中位年龄为 32 岁(IQR:26.0-38.0);54.4%为男性。在 12 周时,HBI 终点显示调整后的优势比(aOR)=0.60(95%置信区间[CI]:0.25-1.31),乌司奴单抗更有利,治疗效果的概率为 75%,优于维得利珠单抗。临床序贯量表的 aOR=0.61(95%CI:0.26-1.35),乌司奴单抗的有效率为 73%。乌司奴单抗在次要终点也有良好的结果,有效率高达 90%。
在 TNF 治疗失败的 CD 患者中,乌司奴单抗在短期内比维得利珠单抗更有效。这些真实世界的见解有助于了解 CD 的管理,但需要在更大的前瞻性研究和随机对照试验中验证。