Suppr超能文献

由核糖核苷酸还原酶抑制剂和调节剂诱导的三磷酸脱氧核苷库的变化

Changes in deoxynucleoside triphosphate pools induced by inhibitors and modulators of ribonucleotide reductase.

作者信息

Fox R M

出版信息

Pharmacol Ther. 1985;30(1):31-42. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(85)90046-4.

Abstract

Changes in dNTP pools have been studied by a number of investigators, in a wide range of cell types. The in vitro pertubations in dNTP pool levels induced, in particular, by deoxynucleosides which act as allosteric modulators, are not totally consistent with current 'in vitro models' of ribonucleotide reductase function. This problem has also been addressed by Henderson et al. (1980) who stress the profusion of such models. Possible explanations, apart from the technical problems of the range of different experimental conditions (e.g. concentration of modulator used, time of incubation, etc.) for the various cell lines include: Modulators presumably have unpredictable 'network' effects by inhibiting or stimulating many other enzymes involved in the de novo and salvage synthesis of purines and pyrimidines. It is possible there are two separate forms of ribonucleotide reductase, one specifically reducing CDP/UDP, the other ADP/GDP. This, in particular, would explain the lack of decrease in dCTP levels after elevation of the dATP pool. There may be variations in ribonucleotide function which in vivo are cell specific, e.g. in thymic-derived compared with non-T-cell types. Peculiarities of T-cells include: Their ability to elevate their dNTP pools on exposure to very low exogenous concentration of deoxynucleoside. This may reflect very low rates of dNTP catabolism. The biological response of T-cells to elevation of the dATP or dGTP pool is reflected by a G1 block compared to an S phase block in cell-cycle progression in non-T-cell lines. The possibility that, in thymic cells, ribonucleotide reduction is restricted to ADP/GDP while pyrimidine dNTPs are synthesized by salvage pathways. As well, possible variation in the pool localization of dNTPs depending on production by either de novo or salvage synthesis could produce dNTP pool changes not clearly in accord with in vitro models. Clearly, the solution to these problems (although not easy) requires systematic comparative study, using cells of various origin (particularly T vs non-T), of dNTP pool responses to deoxynucleoside modulators, with an attempt to explore the factors described above. However, in the detailed pursuit of such an analysis the concept, that these variations in the control of nucleotide metabolism in T and non-T-cell systems may reflect quite significant differences in growth control and cell-cycle progression, should not be lost.

摘要

许多研究人员在多种细胞类型中对脱氧核苷酸三磷酸(dNTP)库的变化进行了研究。特别是由作为变构调节剂的脱氧核苷诱导的dNTP库水平的体外扰动,与当前核糖核苷酸还原酶功能的“体外模型”并不完全一致。亨德森等人(1980年)也解决了这个问题,他们强调了此类模型的繁多。除了不同细胞系的不同实验条件范围(例如所用调节剂的浓度、孵育时间等)的技术问题外,可能的解释包括:调节剂可能通过抑制或刺激许多参与嘌呤和嘧啶从头合成及补救合成的其他酶而产生不可预测的“网络”效应。有可能存在两种不同形式的核糖核苷酸还原酶,一种专门还原CDP/UDP,另一种还原ADP/GDP。这尤其可以解释dATP库升高后dCTP水平没有下降的现象。核糖核苷酸功能可能存在体内细胞特异性的差异,例如与非T细胞类型相比,胸腺来源的细胞。T细胞的特点包括:它们在暴露于极低浓度的外源脱氧核苷时能够提高其dNTP库。这可能反映了dNTP分解代谢的极低速率。与非T细胞系在细胞周期进程中出现S期阻滞相比,T细胞对dATP或dGTP库升高的生物学反应表现为G1期阻滞。在胸腺细胞中,核糖核苷酸还原可能仅限于ADP/GDP,而嘧啶dNTP则通过补救途径合成。同样,dNTP库定位可能因从头合成或补救合成的产生而有所变化,这可能导致dNTP库的变化与体外模型不太一致。显然,解决这些问题(尽管不容易)需要使用各种来源的细胞(特别是T细胞与非T细胞)对dNTP库对脱氧核苷调节剂的反应进行系统的比较研究,试图探索上述因素。然而,在详细进行这种分析时,不应忽视这样一个概念,即T细胞和非T细胞系统中核苷酸代谢控制的这些差异可能反映了生长控制和细胞周期进程中相当显著的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验