Bakshi Neha, Aggarwal Aditi, Dhawan Shashi, Grover A K, Duggal Lalit, Badwal Sonia, Rao Seema
Pathology (Histopathology division), Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Ophthalmology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
J Clin Pathol. 2024 Aug 19. doi: 10.1136/jcp-2024-209552.
Diagnosis of IgG4-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD) rests on the correlation of clinical features, serological testing and histopathology, using internationally accepted diagnostic criteria for objective interpretation; however, several mimickers of IgG4-RD overlap in clinical presentation and histopathology. We assess histopathological features in a series of presumptive IgG4-ROD cases, with emphasis on histopathological mimics and comparison of three IgG4-ROD diagnostic/classification criteria (organ-specific (OS), revised comprehensive diagnostic (RCD) and American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) criteria).
The histopathology database was screened for cases with clinical/histopathological suspicion of IgG4-ROD. Slides were reviewed, OS, RCD and ACR/EULAR criteria were applied, and the final clinicopathological diagnosis was recorded.
37 patients (24 females, 13 males; 19-73 years) were diagnosed as either IgG4-ROD (n=18) or non-IgG4-related disease (n=19). Non-IgG4-related disease group showed elevated serum IgG4 (55.5%), fibrosis (100%), dense lymphoplasmacytic inflammation (92.8%), with an increase in tissue IgG4+plasma cells (57.1%) and elevated IgG4:IgG+plasma cell ratio (14.3%). ACR/EULAR missed 50% (9/18, sensitivity-52.8%) of true IgG4-ROD cases, while OS and RCD criteria missed 11.1% (2/18, sensitivity-88.9%) of IgG-ROD cases. ACR/EULAR criteria mislabelled 7.14% (1/14, specificity-90.9%) while OS and RCD criteria wrongly categorised 71.4% (10/14, specificity-47.4%) and 50% (7/14, specificity-63.2%) specific non-IgG4-ROD cases as IgG4-ROD. Storiform fibrosis, obliterative phlebitis, increased IgG4:IgG+plasma cell ratio and elevated serum IgG were statistically significant in distinguishing IgG4-ROD from its mimics.
ACR/EULAR criteria showed high specificity but were cumbersome and sensitivity was low, while RCD and OS criteria showed low specificity. Stringent clinicopathological correlation to exclude mimics is critical in avoiding diagnostic errors in IgG4-ROD.
IgG4相关性眼病(IgG4-ROD)的诊断依赖于临床特征、血清学检测和组织病理学之间的相关性,采用国际公认的诊断标准进行客观解读;然而,IgG4-RD的几种模仿者在临床表现和组织病理学上存在重叠。我们评估了一系列疑似IgG4-ROD病例的组织病理学特征,重点关注组织病理学模仿者,并比较了三种IgG4-ROD诊断/分类标准(器官特异性(OS)、修订后的综合诊断(RCD)和美国风湿病学会/欧洲风湿病联盟(ACR/EULAR)标准)。
在组织病理学数据库中筛选出临床/组织病理学怀疑为IgG4-ROD的病例。对切片进行复查,应用OS、RCD和ACR/EULAR标准,并记录最终的临床病理诊断。
37例患者(24例女性,13例男性;年龄19 - 73岁)被诊断为IgG4-ROD(n = 18)或非IgG4相关疾病(n = 19)。非IgG4相关疾病组血清IgG4升高(55.5%)、纤维化(100%)、密集的淋巴浆细胞炎症(92.8%),组织中IgG4 +浆细胞增加(57.1%),IgG4:IgG +浆细胞比值升高(14.3%)。ACR/EULAR标准漏诊了50%(9/18,敏感性 - 52.8%)的真正IgG4-ROD病例,而OS和RCD标准漏诊了11.1%(2/18,敏感性 - 88.9%)的IgG-ROD病例)。ACR/EULAR标准误诊率为7.14%(1/14,特异性 - 90.9%),而OS和RCD标准将71.4%(10/14,特异性 - 47.4%)和50%(7/14,特异性 - 63.2%)的特定非IgG4-ROD病例错误分类为IgG4-ROD。在区分IgG4-ROD与其模仿者方面,束状纤维化、闭塞性静脉炎、IgG4:IgG +浆细胞比值增加和血清IgG升高具有统计学意义。
ACR/EULAR标准显示出高特异性,但操作繁琐且敏感性低,而RCD和OS标准显示出低特异性。在IgG-ROD中,严格的临床病理相关性以排除模仿者对于避免诊断错误至关重要。