Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, University Hospital of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5803-5814. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11137-7. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
Surgical care significantly contributes to healthcare-associated greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). Surgeon attitudes about mitigation of the impact of surgical practice on environmental sustainability remains poorly understood. To better understand surgeon perspectives globally, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery established a joint Sustainability in Surgical Practice (SSP) Task Force and distributed a survey on sustainability.
Our survey asked about (1) surgeon attitudes toward sustainability, (2) ability to estimate the carbon footprint of surgical procedures and supplies, (3) concerns about the negative impacts of sustainable interventions, (4) willingness to change specific practices, and (5) preferred educational topics and modalities. Questions were primarily written in Likert-scale format. A clustering analysis was performed to determine whether survey respondents could be grouped into distinct subsets to inform future outreach and education efforts.
We received 1024 responses, predominantly from North America and Europe. The study revealed that while 63% of respondents were motivated to enhance the sustainability of their practice, less than 10% could accurately estimate the carbon footprint of surgical activities. Most were not concerned that sustainability efforts would negatively impact their practice and showed readiness to adopt proposed sustainable practices. Online webinars and modules were the preferred educational methods. A clustering analysis identified a group particularly concerned yet willing to adopt sustainable changes.
Surgeons believe that operating room waste is a critical issue and are willing to change practice to improve it. However, there exists a gap in understanding the environmental impact of surgical procedures and supplies, and a sizable minority have some degree of concern about potential adverse consequences of implementing sustainable policies. This study uniquely provides an international, multidisciplinary snapshot of surgeons' attitudes, knowledge, concerns, willingness, and preferred educational modalities related to mitigating the environmental impact of surgical practice.
外科手术在医疗保健相关温室气体排放(GHG)中占很大比重。外科医生对减轻手术实践对环境可持续性影响的态度仍知之甚少。为了更好地了解全球外科医生的观点,美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会和欧洲内镜外科学会成立了一个联合可持续性外科实践(SSP)工作组,并分发了一份关于可持续性的调查。
我们的调查询问了(1)外科医生对可持续性的态度,(2)估计手术程序和用品碳足迹的能力,(3)对可持续干预负面后果的关注,(4)愿意改变特定实践的意愿,以及(5)首选的教育主题和模式。问题主要以李克特量表格式编写。进行聚类分析以确定是否可以将调查受访者分为不同的子集,以为未来的外展和教育工作提供信息。
我们收到了 1024 份回复,主要来自北美和欧洲。研究表明,虽然 63%的受访者有动力提高实践的可持续性,但不到 10%的人能够准确估计手术活动的碳足迹。大多数人并不担心可持续发展努力会对他们的实践产生负面影响,并表示愿意采用拟议的可持续实践。在线网络研讨会和模块是首选的教育方法。聚类分析确定了一组特别关注但愿意采用可持续变革的人。
外科医生认为手术室废物是一个关键问题,并且愿意改变实践以改善这一问题。然而,他们对外科手术程序和用品对环境的影响的理解存在差距,并且相当一部分人对实施可持续政策可能带来的潜在不利后果表示一定程度的关注。这项研究独特地提供了外科医生对减轻手术实践对环境影响的态度、知识、关注、意愿和首选教育模式的国际、多学科的快照。