Suppr超能文献

SP3 和 SP4 对蛋白质的捕获差异揭示了蛋白质组学清洗技术的机制见解。

Differences in Protein Capture by SP3 and SP4 Demonstrate Mechanistic Insights of Proteomics Cleanup Techniques.

机构信息

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97348, Waco, Texas 76798, United States.

Department of Biology, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97388, Waco, Texas 76798, United States.

出版信息

J Proteome Res. 2024 Sep 6;23(9):3877-3889. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00206. Epub 2024 Aug 19.

Abstract

The goal of proteomics experiments is to identify proteins to observe changes in cellular processes and diseases. One challenge in proteomics is the removal of contaminants following protein extraction, which can limit protein identifications. Single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP3) is a cleanup technique in which proteins are captured on carboxylate-modified particles through a proposed hydrophilic-interaction-liquid-chromatography (HILIC)-like mechanism. Recent results have suggested that proteins are captured in SP3 due to a protein-aggregation mechanism. Solvent precipitation, single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP4) is a newer cleanup technique that employs protein aggregation to capture proteins without modified particles. We hypothesize that differences in capture mechanisms of SP3 and SP4 affect which proteins are identified by each cleanup technique. Herein, we assess the proteins identified and enriched using SP3 versus SP4 for MCF7 subcellular fractions and correlate protein capture in each method to protein hydrophobicity. Our results indicate that SP3 captures more hydrophilic proteins through a combination of HILIC-like and protein-aggregation mechanisms, while SP4 captures more hydrophobic proteins through a protein-aggregation mechanism. Ultimately, we demonstrate that protein-capture mechanisms are distinct, and the selection of a cleanup technique that yields high proteome coverage is dependent on protein-sample hydrophobicity. Data has been deposited into MassIVE (MSV000094130) and ProteomeXchange (PXD049965).

摘要

蛋白质组学实验的目的是鉴定蛋白质,以观察细胞过程和疾病的变化。蛋白质组学的一个挑战是在蛋白质提取后去除污染物,这会限制蛋白质的鉴定。单管固相增强样品制备(SP3)是一种净化技术,其中蛋白质通过拟议的亲水相互作用液相色谱(HILIC)样机制被捕获在羧酸修饰的颗粒上。最近的结果表明,蛋白质是由于蛋白质聚集机制而被 SP3 捕获的。溶剂沉淀,单管固相增强样品制备(SP4)是一种较新的净化技术,它利用蛋白质聚集来捕获蛋白质,而无需修饰颗粒。我们假设 SP3 和 SP4 的捕获机制的差异会影响每种净化技术鉴定的蛋白质。在此,我们评估了 MCF7 亚细胞级分中使用 SP3 与 SP4 鉴定和富集的蛋白质,并将每种方法中的蛋白质捕获与蛋白质疏水性相关联。我们的结果表明,SP3 通过 HILIC 样和蛋白质聚集机制的组合捕获更多的亲水性蛋白质,而 SP4 通过蛋白质聚集机制捕获更多的疏水性蛋白质。最终,我们证明了蛋白质捕获机制是不同的,并且选择产生高蛋白质组覆盖率的净化技术取决于蛋白质-样品疏水性。数据已存入 MassIVE(MSV000094130)和 ProteomeXchange(PXD049965)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验