Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Division of Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2429237. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.29237.
Randomized clinical trials have shown that sacubitril-valsartan reduces the risks of mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but patients with kidney failure requiring dialysis were excluded.
To investigate the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril-valsartan vs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs or ARBs) in patients with HFrEF requiring hemodialysis.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective, 1:1 propensity score-matched comparative effectiveness study included patients who were 18 years or older with HFrEF, enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D, and survived at least 90 days receiving in-center hemodialysis from July 8, 2015, to December 31, 2020. Patients were excluded for less than 180 days of continuous Medicare Parts A, B, and D primary payer coverage or prior dispensing of sacubitril-valsartan. Data analysis was conducted from September 23, 2023, to June 25, 2024.
New use of sacubitril-valsartan vs new or continued use of ACEIs or ARBs.
The associations between initiation of sacubitril-valsartan therapy and all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and HF hospitalization were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models in a propensity score-matched sample.
Participants included 1:1 matched pairs of 1434 sacubitril-valsartan users and 1434 ACEI or ARB users (mean [SD] age, 64 [13] years). Of the 2868 matched participants, 996 (65%) were male; 987 (34%) were Black or African American and 1677 (58%) were White; and median dialysis vintage was 3.8 (IQR, 1.8-6.3) years. The median follow-up was 0.9 (IQR, 0.4-1.7) years. Sacubitril-valsartan (vs ACEI or ARB) therapy was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.92]) and all-cause hospitalization (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.79-0.93]) but not cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.86-1.19]) or HF hospitalization (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.82-1.02]). There was a decrease in hyperkalemia (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.62-0.81]) and no difference in hypotension (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.83-1.19]). Only 195 participants (14%) ever received the maximum combination dose of sacubitril (97 mg twice daily) and valsartan (103 mg twice daily).
In this comparative effectiveness study of patients with HFrEF requiring hemodialysis, sacubitril-valsartan therapy was associated with beneficial effects in all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization.
随机临床试验表明,沙库比曲缬沙坦可降低射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的死亡率和住院风险,但排除了需要透析的肾衰竭患者。
研究沙库比曲缬沙坦与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ACEI 或 ARB)在需要血液透析的 HFrEF 患者中的比较疗效。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项回顾性、1:1 倾向评分匹配的比较疗效研究,纳入了年龄在 18 岁及以上、参加医疗保险 A、B 和 D 部分、至少存活 90 天并在 2015 年 7 月 8 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间在中心接受血液透析的 HFrEF 患者。排除了医疗保险 A、B 和 D 主要支付人覆盖期不足 180 天或之前未开处方沙库比曲缬沙坦的患者。数据分析于 2023 年 9 月 23 日至 2024 年 6 月 25 日进行。
新使用沙库比曲缬沙坦与新使用或继续使用 ACEI 或 ARB。
使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型评估起始沙库比曲缬沙坦治疗与全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、全因住院率和 HF 住院率之间的关联,该模型基于倾向评分匹配样本。
参与者包括 1:1 匹配的 1434 名沙库比曲缬沙坦使用者和 1434 名 ACEI 或 ARB 使用者(平均[标准差]年龄,64[13]岁)。在 2868 名匹配参与者中,996 名(65%)为男性;987 名(34%)为黑种人或非裔美国人,1677 名(58%)为白人;中位数透析龄为 3.8(IQR,1.8-6.3)年。中位随访时间为 0.9(IQR,0.4-1.7)年。与 ACEI 或 ARB 相比,沙库比曲缬沙坦(vs ACEI 或 ARB)治疗与全因死亡率降低相关(风险比[HR],0.82[95%CI,0.73-0.92])和全因住院率(HR,0.86[95%CI,0.79-0.93]),但与心血管死亡率(HR,1.01[95%CI,0.86-1.19])或 HF 住院率(HR,0.91[95%CI,0.82-1.02])无关。高钾血症(HR,0.71[95%CI,0.62-0.81])减少,低血压(HR,0.99[95%CI,0.83-1.19])无差异。只有 195 名参与者(14%)曾经接受过沙库比曲缬沙坦(每天两次 97 毫克)和缬沙坦(每天两次 103 毫克)的最大联合剂量。
在这项需要血液透析的 HFrEF 患者的比较疗效研究中,沙库比曲缬沙坦治疗与全因死亡率和全因住院率的有益效果相关。