• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估长崎急性心肌梗死二级预防临床路径的最佳实践和障碍。

An evaluation of the best practices and barriers for the Nagasaki acute myocardial infarction secondary prevention clinical pathway.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.

HEOR Group, Value and Access Division, Novartis Pharma K.K, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):1134-1145. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2395164. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1080/13696998.2024.2395164
PMID:39163550
Abstract

AIMS

The Nagasaki Acute Myocardial Infarction Secondary Prevention Clinical Pathway (NASP), a guideline-based regional clinical pathway, was developed to manage low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the Nagasaki prefecture in Japan. This study aimed to summarize the perceived best practices and barriers for the dissemination and operation of the NASP.

METHODS

This exploratory sequential mixed methods study was developed around the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework. Focus group interviews were conducted with 24 physicians with experience treating AMI in alignment with the NASP at foundation hospitals. The identified themes and insights were integrated into the development of the questionnaire. The web-based, self-administered questionnaire with a cross-sectional study design was given to 62 physicians in the Nagasaki prefecture. Mixed-method data integration of the results from both study phases was conducted through meta-inferences made from the qualitative and quantitative data.

RESULTS

The best practices included the development of multi-disciplinary operation teams at medical facilities in preparation for the implementation of the NASP, the simplification of the document preparation process, and the establishment of an additional medical fees policy for the utilization of the NASP instead of patient referral documents. Practices tailored to the type of medical institute such as instructing patients on the NASP regimen during index hospitalization for acute-care hospitals, and the development of NASP instructions and manuals for primary care hospitals/outpatient clinics were also recommended. In addition, barriers to the implementation of the NASP such as missed eligible AMI patients for the NASP and the inconsistent implementation to eligible AMI patients were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified the perceived best practices and barriers for the NASP. This knowledge should be considered when expanding the NASP to other institutions across Japan.

摘要

目的

长崎急性心肌梗死二级预防临床路径(NASP)是一种基于指南的区域临床路径,旨在管理日本长崎县急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平。本研究旨在总结 NASP 传播和实施的最佳做法和障碍。

方法

本探索性序贯混合方法研究围绕 RE-AIM(范围、有效性、采用、实施、维持)框架展开。在基础医院,与 NASP 一致,对 24 名有 AMI 治疗经验的医生进行了焦点小组访谈。确定的主题和见解被纳入问卷的制定。在长崎县,向 62 名医生发放了基于网络的横断面研究设计的自我管理问卷。通过对定性和定量数据进行元推断,对两个研究阶段的结果进行了混合方法数据整合。

结果

最佳实践包括在医疗机构中组建多学科运营团队,为实施 NASP 做好准备,简化文件编制流程,并为利用 NASP 而不是患者转诊文件制定额外的医疗费用政策。还建议根据医疗机构的类型制定实践措施,例如在急性护理医院为住院患者介绍 NASP 方案,以及为初级保健医院/门诊制定 NASP 说明和手册。此外,还确定了 NASP 实施的障碍,例如错过 NASP 合格的 AMI 患者和对合格的 AMI 患者实施不一致。

结论

本研究确定了 NASP 的最佳做法和障碍。在向日本其他机构推广 NASP 时,应考虑这些知识。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the best practices and barriers for the Nagasaki acute myocardial infarction secondary prevention clinical pathway.评估长崎急性心肌梗死二级预防临床路径的最佳实践和障碍。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):1134-1145. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2395164. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
2
Impact of Implementation of a Region-Wide Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Management Clinical Pathway for the Secondary Prevention of Acute Myocardial Infarction.区域范围内实施低密度脂蛋白胆固醇管理临床路径对急性心肌梗死二级预防的影响。
Circ J. 2024 Oct 25;88(11):1825-1832. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0338. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
3
Differences in physician compliance with guideline on lipid profile determination within 24 h after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后24小时内医生在血脂谱测定指南遵循方面的差异。
Med Princ Pract. 2005 Jan-Feb;14(1):41-5. doi: 10.1159/000081922.
4
Evaluation of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Target Attainment Rates According to the 2016 and 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society Dyslipidemia Guidelines for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.根据 2016 年和 2019 年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲动脉粥样硬化学会急性心肌梗死二级预防血脂异常指南评估低密度脂蛋白胆固醇达标率。
Rev Invest Clin. 2021 Nov 5;73(3):371-378. doi: 10.24875/RIC.21000152.
5
Impact of the statin escape phenomenon on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Subgroup analysis of the Nagoya Acute Myocardial Infarction Study (NAMIS).他汀类药物逃逸现象对急性心肌梗死患者长期临床结局的影响:名古屋急性心肌梗死研究(NAMIS)的亚组分析
Atherosclerosis. 2015 Sep;242(1):155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
6
Comparison of the effects of two low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction in real-world practice: ≥ 50% reduction from baseline versus <70 mg/dL.急性心肌梗死后二级预防中两个低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标在实际临床中的效果比较:较基线水平降低≥50%与<70 mg/dL。
Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.386. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
7
Long-term secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarction (SEPAT) - guidelines adherence and outcome.急性心肌梗死的长期二级预防(SEPAT)——指南依从性与结局
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Nov 17;16(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0400-6.
8
European Physician Survey Characterizing the Clinical Pathway and Treatment Patterns of Patients Post-Myocardial Infarction.欧洲医师调查:心肌梗死后患者的临床路径和治疗模式特征。
Adv Ther. 2023 Jan;40(1):233-251. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02344-6. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
9
New recommendations from the 1999 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association acute myocardial infarction guidelines.1999年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会急性心肌梗死指南的新建议。
Ann Pharmacother. 2001 May;35(5):589-617. doi: 10.1345/aph.10319.
10
A community-wide survey of physician practices and attitudes toward cholesterol management in patients with recent acute myocardial infarction.一项针对近期急性心肌梗死患者胆固醇管理的医生实践与态度的全社区调查。
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Apr 8;162(7):797-804. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.7.797.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of Physician Concerns Regarding Implementation of the Nagasaki Acute Myocardial Infarction Secondary Prevention Clinical Pathway.确定医生对长崎急性心肌梗死二级预防临床路径实施的担忧。
Circ Rep. 2024 Nov 15;6(12):555-563. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0124. eCollection 2024 Dec 10.