Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA.
J Surg Educ. 2024 Oct;81(10):1355-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.07.025. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
To determine the ability of surgical trainees and faculty to correctly interpret entrustability of a resident learner in a modeled patient care scenario.
Prospective study utilizing a web-based survey including 4 previously-recorded short videos of resident learners targeted to specific levels of the American Board of Surgery's (ABS) Entrustment Scale. Respondents were asked to choose the entrustment level that best corresponded to their observations of the learner in the video. Responses were subcategorized by low and high entrustment.
Online, utilizing the Qualtrics survey platform.
Survey targeting US surgical trainees and surgical faculty via email and social media. We received 31 complete responses and 2 responses which completed > 1 video assessment question without demographic information (n = 33). Respondents included 10 trainees (32%) and 21 attending surgeons (68%).
Neither faculty nor trainees readily identified the targeted entrustment level for Question 1 (preoperative care of a patient with acute appendicitis with high entrustment, 36% correct), though evaluations of the remaining questions (2 through 4) demonstrated more accuracy (70, 84, and 75% correct, respectively). Faculty were more readily able than trainees to identify low entrustment (level Limited Participation) in intraoperative inguinal hernia repair (95% vs 60%, p = 0.03). After subcategorization to high and low entrustment, both residents and faculty were able to accurately identify entrustment 95% overall.
Both trainees and attending surgeons were able to identify high- and low-performing residents on short video demonstrations using the ABS EPA entrustment scale. This provides additional evidence in support of the need for frequent observations of EPAs to account for the variability in raters' perceptions in addition to complexity of clinical scenarios. Frame-of-reference training via a video-based platform may also be beneficial for both residents and faculty as an ongoing EPA implementation strategy.
确定外科受训者和教员正确解读模型患者护理场景中住院医师学习者可委托程度的能力。
前瞻性研究,使用基于网络的调查,包括 4 个以前录制的针对美国外科学委员会(ABS)委托量表特定级别住院医师学习者的短视频。受访者被要求选择最能反映他们在视频中观察到的学习者的委托级别。响应被分为低委托和高委托。
在线,使用 Qualtrics 调查平台。
通过电子邮件和社交媒体向美国外科受训者和外科教员发送调查。我们收到了 31 个完整回复和 2 个回复,其中 2 个回复完成了 > 1 个视频评估问题,但没有人口统计信息(n=33)。受访者包括 10 名受训者(32%)和 21 名主治外科医生(68%)。
教员和受训者都没有轻易识别出问题 1(高委托的急性阑尾炎患者的术前护理)的目标委托级别(36%正确),尽管对其余问题(2 至 4)的评估表明更准确(分别为 70、84 和 75%正确)。教员比受训者更容易识别出术中腹股沟疝修补术的低委托(参与有限)(95%对 60%,p=0.03)。在分为高委托和低委托后,住院医师和教员总体上都能准确识别委托程度 95%。
受训者和主治外科医生都能够通过 ABS EPA 委托量表的短视频演示识别高绩效和低绩效住院医师。这为需要频繁观察 EPA 以弥补评分者感知的变异性以及临床情景的复杂性提供了额外的证据。基于视频的框架参考培训可能对住院医师和教员都是有益的,作为 EPA 实施策略的持续手段。