Esen Ebru, Morkavuk Sevket Baris, Turan Mujdat, Akyuz Simay, Guler Sumeyra, Akgul Gokhan Giray, Bahcecioglu Ibrahim Burak, Gulcelik Mehmet Ali, Yilmaz Kerim Bora
İstinye University, Bahçeşehir Liv Hospital, Department of Surgical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey.
University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Research and Training Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Ankara, Turkey.
Asian J Surg. 2024 Aug 19. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.07.333.
The main complications seen in patients who have undergone modified radical mastectomy (MRM) are seroma, surgical site infection, hematoma, wound dehiscence, flap necrosis, and nerve damage. While these complications lead to some problems the most feared effect in the early period is that they cause a delay in adjuvant treatment. Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (iNPWT) decreases wound dehiscence by reducing oedema and tension, especially in the incision line. This study aim to compare recovery times and wound site complications between patients treated with conventional wound dressings and patients treated with iNPWT after MRM.
A retrospective screening was made of the data of 50 patients who underwent MRM because of breast cancer in the General Surgery Clinic of XXX Hospital between 2018 and 2022, and were at high-risk of wound site complications. Two groups were formed as 30 patients applied with iNPWT and 20 patients applied with conventional dressings.
The mean age of the 50 female patients was 53.58 years (range, 30-80 years). The most frequently seen complications were seroma (20 patients) and partial flap ischaemia (14 patients). The mean number of iNPWT applications was 1.30 (range, 1-2), and the mean number of days of application was 4.47 (range, 2-9). Postoperative seroma was observed in 8 patients in the iNPWT group and in 12 patients in the conventional dressings group (p = 0.018). Flap ischaemia and the probability of dehiscence was determined at a statistically significantly higher rate in the patients in the conventional dressings groups (p = 0.005, p = 0.021).
The results of this study demonstrated that the use of iNPWT significantly reduced the amount of postoperative drainage, thereby contributing to early drain removal. Furthermore, iNPWT significantly reduced postoperative seroma, flap ischaemia, and flap dehiscence compared to conventional dressings.
改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)患者中常见的主要并发症有血清肿、手术部位感染、血肿、伤口裂开、皮瓣坏死和神经损伤。虽然这些并发症会引发一些问题,但早期最令人担忧的影响是它们会导致辅助治疗延迟。切口负压伤口治疗(iNPWT)通过减轻水肿和张力来减少伤口裂开,尤其是在切口处。本研究旨在比较MRM术后接受传统伤口敷料治疗的患者和接受iNPWT治疗的患者的恢复时间及伤口部位并发症情况。
对2018年至2022年期间在XXX医院普通外科门诊因乳腺癌接受MRM且有伤口部位并发症高风险的50例患者的数据进行回顾性筛查。将患者分为两组,30例应用iNPWT,20例应用传统敷料。
50例女性患者的平均年龄为53.58岁(范围30 - 80岁)。最常见的并发症是血清肿(20例患者)和部分皮瓣缺血(14例患者)。iNPWT的平均应用次数为1.30次(范围1 - 2次),平均应用天数为4.47天(范围2 - 9天)。iNPWT组有8例患者出现术后血清肿,传统敷料组有12例患者出现(p = 0.018)。传统敷料组患者皮瓣缺血和伤口裂开的概率在统计学上显著更高(p = 0.005,p = 0.021)。
本研究结果表明,使用iNPWT可显著减少术后引流量,从而有助于早期拔除引流管。此外,与传统敷料相比,iNPWT可显著减少术后血清肿、皮瓣缺血和皮瓣裂开。