An improved Gaussian process for filling the missing data in GNSS position time series considering the influence of adjacent stations.

Due to various unavoidable reasons or gross error elimination, missing data inevitably exist in global navigation satellite system (GNSS) position time series, which may result in many analysis methods not being applicable. Typically, interpolating the missing data is a crucial preprocessing step before analyzing the time series. The conventional methods for filling missing data do not consider the influence of adjacent stations. In this work, an improved Gaussian process (GP) approach is developed to fill the missing data of GNSS time series, in which the time series of adjacent stations are applied to construct impact factors, together with a comparison of the conventional GP and the commonly used cubic spline methods. For the simulation experiments, the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and correlation coefficient (R) are adopted to evaluate the performance of the improved GP. The results show that the filled missing data of the improved GP are closer to the true values than those of the conventional GP and cubic spline methods, regardless of the missing percentages ranging from 5 to 30%, with an interval of 5%. Specifically, the mean relative RMSE and MAE improvements for the improved GP with respect to the conventional GP are 21.2%, 21.3% and 8.3% and 12.7%, 16.2% and 11.01% for the North (N), East (E) and Up (U) components, respectively. In the real experiment, eight GNSS stations are analyzed using improved GP, together with conventional GP and a cubic spline. The results indicate that the first three principal components (PCs) of the improved GP can perverse 98.3%, 99.8% and 77.0% of the total variance for the N, E and U components, respectively. This value is obviously higher than those of the conventional GP and cubic spline. Therefore, we can conclude that the improved GP can better fill in the missing data in GNSS position time series than the conventional GP and cubic spline because of the impacts of adjacent stations.