• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估旱厕前端特征和相关表面大肠杆菌表明斐济农村存在粪便污染。

An assessment of latrine front-end characteristics and associated surface E. coli indicated faecal contamination in rural Fiji.

机构信息

School of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, Darlington, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Fiji Institute of Pacific Health Research, College of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Fiji National University, Hoodless House, Suva, Fiji.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Aug;31(40):52948-52962. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34668-x. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-024-34668-x
PMID:39164561
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11379791/
Abstract

In Fiji, 90% of the population has access to basic sanitation; however, there are still persistent health risks from endemic faecal-oral diseases such as typhoid fever. There is a need to assess the contribution of existing sanitation facilities in the faecal pathogen transmission pathway. This study was conducted as part of a larger planetary health study across 29 rural communities within five river catchments. This specific research aimed to characterise latrine front-ends, both infrastructure and usage behaviour, and to assess the faecal contamination levels on various frequently contacted latrine surfaces in rural Fiji. A sanitation survey, along with observation and latrine swab sampling, was conducted in households over three phases: baseline (n = 311) (Aug-Dec 2019), endline (n = 262) (Jun-Sep 2022) and an in-depth front-end study (n = 12) (Oct-Nov 2022). Of 311 households, almost all had pedestal-type latrines, predominately cistern-flush (83%), followed by pour-flush (13%), and then hole-type (pit) latrines (4%). Washable latrine floors had significantly higher E. coli densities (6.7 × 10 CFU/25 cm) compared to non-washable floors (1.3 × 10 CFU/25 cm) (p = 0.05), despite washable floors indicating improved latrines. The in-depth front-end analysis found that moist latrine surfaces had significantly elevated E. coli densities (1.2 × 10 CFU/25 cm) compared to the dry ones (14.3 CFU/25 cm) (p < 0.001), highlighting the importance of maintaining dry latrine surfaces. Latrine floors and mid-walls were the most frequently contaminated surfaces, emphasising the need to clean and disinfect these surfaces. Only 46% of the households reported always using soap for handwashing after defecation, exacerbating the risk of transmitting faecal pathogens. This study highlights that latrine cleanliness and hygiene are as crucial as latrine infrastructures for the effective disruption of faecal pathogens transmission during latrine use.

摘要

在斐济,90%的人口能够获得基本的环境卫生设施;然而,由于伤寒等地方性粪口疾病的存在,仍存在持续的健康风险。需要评估现有环境卫生设施在粪源性病原体传播途径中的作用。本研究是在五大河流流域的 29 个农村社区进行的一项更大的行星健康研究的一部分。这项具体研究旨在描述厕所前端,包括基础设施和使用行为,并评估斐济农村地区各种经常接触的厕所表面的粪便污染水平。在三个阶段对家庭进行了环境卫生调查、观察和厕所拭子采样:基线(n=311)(2019 年 8 月至 12 月)、终点(n=262)(2022 年 6 月至 9 月)和深入前端研究(n=12)(2022 年 10 月至 11 月)。在 311 户家庭中,几乎所有家庭都使用了带基座的厕所,主要是水箱冲洗式(83%),其次是倾倒冲洗式(13%),然后是坑式(坑)厕所(4%)。可水洗的厕所地板的大肠杆菌密度明显高于不可水洗的地板(6.7×10 CFU/25 cm 比 1.3×10 CFU/25 cm)(p=0.05),尽管可水洗地板表明厕所状况得到了改善。深入的前端分析发现,潮湿的厕所表面的大肠杆菌密度明显高于干燥的厕所表面(1.2×10 CFU/25 cm 比 14.3 CFU/25 cm)(p<0.001),这突出表明保持厕所表面干燥的重要性。厕所地板和中墙是最常被污染的表面,这强调了清洁和消毒这些表面的必要性。只有 46%的家庭报告说在排便后总是使用肥皂洗手,这加剧了粪源性病原体传播的风险。本研究强调,厕所清洁和卫生与厕所基础设施一样重要,对于在使用厕所时有效阻断粪源性病原体的传播至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11379791/88d98a83d98d/11356_2024_34668_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11379791/6862cc7c4f32/11356_2024_34668_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11379791/b93f0fd1be9d/11356_2024_34668_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11379791/8aec24c346d0/11356_2024_34668_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11379791/0ca4bf728b61/11356_2024_34668_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11379791/88d98a83d98d/11356_2024_34668_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11379791/6862cc7c4f32/11356_2024_34668_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11379791/b93f0fd1be9d/11356_2024_34668_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11379791/8aec24c346d0/11356_2024_34668_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11379791/0ca4bf728b61/11356_2024_34668_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f374/11379791/88d98a83d98d/11356_2024_34668_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An assessment of latrine front-end characteristics and associated surface E. coli indicated faecal contamination in rural Fiji.评估旱厕前端特征和相关表面大肠杆菌表明斐济农村存在粪便污染。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Aug;31(40):52948-52962. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34668-x. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
2
A review of latrine front-end characteristics associated with microbial infection risk; reveals a lack of pathogen density data.关于与微生物感染风险相关的厕所前端特征的综述;揭示了缺乏病原体密度数据。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2023 Sep;254:114261. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114261. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
3
Advantages and limitations for users of double pit pour-flush latrines: a qualitative study in rural Bangladesh.双坑式冲水厕所使用者的优点和局限性:孟加拉国农村地区的一项定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 25;17(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4412-7.
4
Performance of Pit Latrines and Their Herd Protection Against Diarrhea: A Longitudinal Cohort Study in Rural Ethiopia.坑式厕所的性能及其对腹泻的畜群保护作用:埃塞俄比亚农村的一项纵向队列研究。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Jun 27;12(3). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00541.
5
Contributing to the debate on categorising shared sanitation facilities as 'unimproved': An account based on field researchers' observations and householders' opinions in three regions, Tanzania.关于将共享卫生设施归类为“未改善”设施的辩论:基于坦桑尼亚三个地区实地研究人员的观察和住户意见的描述
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 6;12(11):e0185875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185875. eCollection 2017.
6
Bacterial Contamination on Latrine Surfaces in Community and Household Latrines in Kathmandu, Nepal.尼泊尔加德满都社区和家庭厕所表面的细菌污染。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 17;16(2):257. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020257.
7
Open defecation practice among households with latrines in rural communities of Ararso District, Somali Region, Eastern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚东部索马里地区阿腊尔索区农村社区有厕所的家庭中的露天排便习惯。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 1;12:1394351. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1394351. eCollection 2024.
8
Within-Compound Versus Public Latrine Access and Child Feces Disposal Practices in Low-Income Neighborhoods of Accra, Ghana.加纳阿克拉低收入社区中,同一建筑内厕所与公共厕所的使用与儿童粪便处理方式比较。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 May;98(5):1250-1259. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0654. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
9
Assessment of community led total sanitation and hygiene approach on improvement of latrine utilization in Laelay Maichew District, North Ethiopia. A comparative cross-sectional study.评估社区主导的全面环境卫生方法对改善埃塞俄比亚北部拉利贝拉马乔克地区厕所利用的影响:一项比较性横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):e0203458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203458. eCollection 2018.
10
A Cross Sectional Study of the Association between Sanitation Type and Fecal Contamination of the Household Environment in Rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村地区环境卫生类型与家庭环境粪便污染关联的横断面研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Apr;98(4):967-976. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0724. Epub 2018 Feb 8.