• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏移植免疫抑制的改善

Improved immunosuppression for heart transplantation.

作者信息

Bolman R M, Elick B, Olivari M T, Ring W S, Arentzen C E

出版信息

J Heart Transplant. 1985 May;4(3):315-8.

PMID:3916502
Abstract

Since 1981, at the University of Minnesota, and more recently at Washington University in St. Louis, cyclosporine has been used as the main immunosuppressive agent for heart transplantation. It was initially combined with prednisone and given in a manner similar to that described at Stanford. In late 1983, concern regarding the nephrotoxic side effects of cyclosporine were heightened due to the fact that a potential recipient had chronic renal insufficiency secondary to renal damage suffered during previous heart surgery. In this patient it was decided to use lower doses of cyclosporine and to add azathioprine to maintain adequate immunosuppression. Initially, the same prednisone therapy was employed. This patient had an uncomplicated course following heart transplantation and was discharged with a normal renal function. This experience was the origin of a trial consisting of using cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone as immunotherapy for heart transplantation. This report describes the results of this therapy in 17 patients.

摘要

自1981年起,在明尼苏达大学,以及最近在圣路易斯的华盛顿大学,环孢素一直被用作心脏移植的主要免疫抑制剂。它最初与泼尼松联合使用,给药方式与斯坦福大学所描述的类似。1983年末,由于一名潜在受者因先前心脏手术中遭受的肾脏损伤而继发慢性肾功能不全,人们对环孢素的肾毒性副作用的担忧加剧。在该患者中,决定使用较低剂量的环孢素并添加硫唑嘌呤以维持足够的免疫抑制。最初,采用相同的泼尼松治疗方案。该患者心脏移植后病程顺利,出院时肾功能正常。这一经验促成了一项使用环孢素、硫唑嘌呤和泼尼松作为心脏移植免疫疗法的试验。本报告描述了该疗法在17例患者中的结果。

相似文献

1
Improved immunosuppression for heart transplantation.心脏移植免疫抑制的改善
J Heart Transplant. 1985 May;4(3):315-8.
2
The Stanford experience: survival and renal function in the pre-sandimmune era compared to the sandimmune era.斯坦福大学的经验:与环孢素时代相比,环孢素前时代的生存率和肾功能。
Transplant Proc. 1990 Jun;22(3 Suppl 1):1-5.
3
Immunosuppression after heart transplantation: prednisone and cyclosporine with and without azathioprine.心脏移植后的免疫抑制:泼尼松与环孢素联用,以及是否联用硫唑嘌呤。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Nov;98(5 Pt 2):951-5.
4
Comparison of immunosuppression therapy following heart transplantation: pretransfusion/azathioprine/ATG/prednisone versus cyclosporine/prednisone.心脏移植后免疫抑制治疗的比较:输血前/硫唑嘌呤/抗胸腺细胞球蛋白/泼尼松与环孢素/泼尼松对比
J Heart Transplant. 1985 Jul-Aug;4(4):381-4.
5
Reduction of infectious complications following heart transplantation with triple-drug immunotherapy.三联药物免疫疗法降低心脏移植术后感染并发症的发生率
J Heart Transplant. 1986 Jan-Feb;5(1):13-9.
6
Effect of discontinuing or restricting cyclosporine on late renal allograft rejection and function.停用或限制环孢素对晚期肾移植排斥反应和肾功能的影响。
Transplant Proc. 1989 Feb;21(1 Pt 2):1641-2.
7
Heart allograft rejection under varying immunosuppressive protocols as evaluated by endomyocardial biopsy.通过心内膜心肌活检评估不同免疫抑制方案下的心脏同种异体移植排斥反应。
J Heart Transplant. 1986 Jul-Aug;5(4):279-85.
8
Arterial hypertension in heart transplant recipients treated with triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy.
J Heart Transplant. 1989 Jan-Feb;8(1):34-9.
9
[The effect of cyclosporin on renal function following cardiac transplantation: should one lessen the toxicity?].
Can J Surg. 1990 Jun;33(3):243-7.
10
Improved early course after cadaveric renal transplantation by reducing the cyclosporine dose and adding azathioprine.通过降低环孢素剂量并添加硫唑嘌呤改善尸体肾移植后的早期病程。
Transplant Proc. 1987 Feb;19(1 Pt 3):2074-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Transplant Coronary Vasculopathy.移植冠状动脉血管病变
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2001 Feb;3(1):55-63. doi: 10.1007/s11936-001-0085-7.
2
A prospective trial of tacrolimus (FK 506) in clinical heart transplantation: intermediate-term results.一项关于他克莫司(FK 506)用于临床心脏移植的前瞻性试验:中期结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Apr;111(4):764-72. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70336-7.