• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术治疗与非手术治疗近端腘绳肌撕脱伤的比较:来自近端腘绳肌撕脱伤手术队列研究的平均随访时间>4 年的配对比较研究。

Surgical Treatment of Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Injuries Compared With Nonsurgical Treatment: A Matched Comparative Study With a Mean Follow-up of >4 Years From the Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Surgery Cohort Study.

机构信息

Clinique du Sport, Paris, France.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2024 Sep;52(11):2718-2727. doi: 10.1177/03635465241270139. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1177/03635465241270139
PMID:39165177
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11402259/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical outcomes for proximal hamstring avulsion injury (PHAI) are well documented, yet comparative analyses with nonsurgical approaches remain scarce.

PURPOSE

To compare the functional outcomes between surgical and nonsurgical interventions for PHAI.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This comparative study, conducted at a sports surgery center between January 2012 and July 2021, focused on patients with primary PHAI. The study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Group selection involved utilizing propensity score matching to compare an arm of patients who were surgically treated (indications included patients with complete injury, patients with partial injury with >2 cm of retraction, and patients for whom 6 months of nonsurgical treatment failed) with another arm of patients who refused surgery. The primary outcome was evaluated using the Parisian Hamstring Avulsion Score (PHAS). The secondary outcomes included the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) score; University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score; rate and quality of return to sport (RTS); and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The study included 32 patients (mean age, 55.8 years [SD, 8.4 years]) in the nonsurgical treatment arm and 95 patients in the surgical treatment arm (mean age, 53.4 years [SD, 7.7 years]) ( > .05). The interval from injury to treatment was 5.7 months (SD, 9.6 months) for the surgical group and 12.7 months (SD, 25.9 months) for the nonsurgical group ( > .05). At the final follow-up (nonsurgical group: mean, 56.5 months [SD, 28.2 months]; surgical group: mean, 50.7 months [SD, 33.1 months]), the PHAS was significantly higher in the surgical group (mean, 86.3 [SD, 13.7]) compared with the nonsurgical group (mean, 69.8 [SD, 15.1]) ( < .0001). Higher activity scores were also observed in the surgical group for the TAS and UCLA scores ( = .0224 and = .0026, respectively). A higher percentage of the surgical group (68.4%) returned to sports compared with the nonsurgical group (46.9%) ( = .0354), with a greater proportion in the surgical group returning at the same or higher level (67.7% vs 26.7%) ( = .0069). Additionally, a higher satisfaction level was reported by patients in the surgical group (89.5%) in contrast to the nonsurgical group (25%) ( < .0001). Three patients in the surgical group experienced complications (2 reruptures and 1 hyperesthesia at the pudendal nerve territories). Odds ratios (ORs) indicated that patients in the surgical group were significantly more likely to achieve or exceed median scores for the PHAS (OR, 6.79; < .001), TAS score (OR, 2.29; = .045), and UCLA score (OR, 3.63; = .003), as well as to RTS at any level (OR, 2.46; = .031) or at the preinjury level or higher (OR, 6.04; < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that surgical treatment of PHAI significantly enhances long-term functional scores, including the PHAS, TAS score, UCLA score, satisfaction, and RTS, at a mean follow-up of >4 years compared with nonsurgical treatment.

REGISTRATION

NCT02906865 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff54/11402259/355ae315e5bb/10.1177_03635465241270139-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff54/11402259/ab69299608bb/10.1177_03635465241270139-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff54/11402259/355ae315e5bb/10.1177_03635465241270139-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff54/11402259/ab69299608bb/10.1177_03635465241270139-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff54/11402259/355ae315e5bb/10.1177_03635465241270139-fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

近端腘绳肌腱撕脱伤(PHAI)的手术治疗效果已有大量文献报道,但与非手术治疗方法的比较分析仍然很少。

目的

比较 PHAI 的手术与非手术干预的功能结果。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3 级。

方法

这项在运动外科中心进行的比较研究,纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月期间的原发性 PHAI 患者。该研究是对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。通过使用倾向评分匹配选择患者,比较手术治疗组(适应证包括完全损伤的患者、有 >2cm 回缩的部分损伤患者以及经 6 个月非手术治疗失败的患者)与拒绝手术的另一组患者。主要结局评估采用巴黎腘绳肌腱撕脱评分(PHAS)。次要结局包括 Tegner 活动评分(TAS)评分、加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分、重返运动(RTS)的比例和质量以及患者满意度。

结果

非手术治疗组纳入 32 例患者(平均年龄,55.8 岁[标准差,8.4 岁]),手术治疗组纳入 95 例患者(平均年龄,53.4 岁[标准差,7.7 岁])(>.05)。手术组的受伤至治疗时间间隔为 5.7 个月(标准差,9.6 个月),非手术组为 12.7 个月(标准差,25.9 个月)(>.05)。在最终随访时(非手术组:平均 56.5 个月[标准差,28.2 个月];手术组:平均 50.7 个月[标准差,33.1 个月]),手术组的 PHAS 明显高于非手术组(手术组 86.3[标准差,13.7];非手术组 69.8[标准差,15.1])(<.0001)。TAS 和 UCLA 评分中,手术组的活动评分也更高(=.0224 和=.0026)。与非手术组(46.9%)相比,手术组有更高比例的患者(68.4%)重返运动(=.0354),且手术组有更高比例的患者以相同或更高水平重返运动(67.7%比 26.7%)(=.0069)。此外,手术组患者的满意度(89.5%)明显高于非手术组(25%)(<.0001)。手术组有 3 例患者出现并发症(2 例肌腱再撕裂和 1 例阴部神经区域感觉过敏)。比值比(OR)表明,手术组患者更有可能达到或超过 PHAS(OR,6.79;<.001)、TAS 评分(OR,2.29;=.045)和 UCLA 评分(OR,3.63;=.003)的中位数,以及任何水平(OR,2.46;=.031)或高于受伤前水平的 RTS(OR,6.04;<.001)。

结论

与非手术治疗相比,PHAI 的手术治疗在平均 >4 年的随访中显著提高了长期功能评分,包括 PHAS、TAS 评分、UCLA 评分、满意度和 RTS。

注册

NCT02906865(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符)。

相似文献

1
Surgical Treatment of Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Injuries Compared With Nonsurgical Treatment: A Matched Comparative Study With a Mean Follow-up of >4 Years From the Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Surgery Cohort Study.手术治疗与非手术治疗近端腘绳肌撕脱伤的比较:来自近端腘绳肌撕脱伤手术队列研究的平均随访时间>4 年的配对比较研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Sep;52(11):2718-2727. doi: 10.1177/03635465241270139. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
2
Predictors of Early Return to Sport After Surgical Repair of Proximal Hamstring Complex Injuries in Professional Athletes: A Prospective Study.运动员接受近端腘绳肌复合体损伤修复术后早期重返运动的预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(4):1005-1013. doi: 10.1177/03635465231225486. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
3
Validation of the Parisian Hamstring Avulsion Score (PHAS) in the Evaluation and Follow-up of Patients Operated for Proximal Hamstring Avulsion.验证巴黎腘绳肌腱撕脱评分(PHAS)在近端腘绳肌腱撕脱患者的评估和随访中的应用。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(4):1014-1021. doi: 10.1177/03635465241227434. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
4
Surgical Management of Chronic Incomplete Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Injuries.慢性不完全性近端腘绳肌撕脱伤的手术治疗。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Apr;48(5):1160-1167. doi: 10.1177/0363546520908819. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
5
Outcomes After Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Proximal Hamstring Avulsions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.手术与非手术治疗近端腘绳肌腱撕裂的结局:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2798-2808. doi: 10.1177/0363546517732526. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
6
Magnetic resonance imaging should be the first-line imaging modality for investigating suspected proximal hamstring avulsion injuries.磁共振成像应作为疑似近端腘绳肌腱撕裂伤的首选影像学检查方法。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Jul;32(7):1862-1870. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12258. Epub 2024 May 20.
7
Satisfactory clinical outcome of operative and non-operative treatment of avulsion fracture of the hamstring origin with treatment selection based on extent of displacement: a systematic review.根据移位程度选择治疗方法对腘绳肌起点撕脱骨折进行手术和非手术治疗的满意临床结果:一项系统评价
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jun;29(6):1813-1821. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06222-y. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
8
Excellent clinical outcome and low complication rate after proximal hamstring tendon repair at mid-term follow up.中期随访结果显示,近端腘绳肌腱修复术后临床效果极佳,并发症发生率低。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Apr;28(4):1230-1235. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05748-0. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
9
Risk Factors for Rerupture After Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Injury Including the Optimal Timing for Surgery.近端腘绳肌撕脱伤后再撕裂的风险因素,包括手术的最佳时机。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Apr;52(5):1173-1182. doi: 10.1177/03635465241233734. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
10
Timing of surgery for complete proximal hamstring avulsion injuries: successful clinical outcomes at 6 weeks, 6 months, and after 6 months of injury.完全性近端腘绳肌撕脱伤的手术时机:伤后6周、6个月及6个月后均获得成功的临床疗效。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):385-91. doi: 10.1177/0363546514557938. Epub 2014 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Soft-Tissue Sources of Extra-articular Pain Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review.全髋关节置换术后关节外疼痛的软组织来源:一项综述
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Sep 5;9(9). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00226. eCollection 2025 Sep 1.
2
No difference in patient-reported outcomes between operative and non-operative management of proximal hamstring injuries, but return to sports is higher in operative treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腘绳肌近端损伤手术与非手术治疗在患者报告结局方面无差异,但手术治疗的运动恢复率更高:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jul 13;12(3):e70327. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70327. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Magnetic resonance imaging should be the first-line imaging modality for investigating suspected proximal hamstring avulsion injuries.磁共振成像应作为疑似近端腘绳肌腱撕裂伤的首选影像学检查方法。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Jul;32(7):1862-1870. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12258. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
Risk Factors for Rerupture After Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Injury Including the Optimal Timing for Surgery.近端腘绳肌撕脱伤后再撕裂的风险因素,包括手术的最佳时机。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Apr;52(5):1173-1182. doi: 10.1177/03635465241233734. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
3
Validation of the Parisian Hamstring Avulsion Score (PHAS) in the Evaluation and Follow-up of Patients Operated for Proximal Hamstring Avulsion.
验证巴黎腘绳肌腱撕脱评分(PHAS)在近端腘绳肌腱撕脱患者的评估和随访中的应用。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(4):1014-1021. doi: 10.1177/03635465241227434. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
4
Predictors of Early Return to Sport After Surgical Repair of Proximal Hamstring Complex Injuries in Professional Athletes: A Prospective Study.运动员接受近端腘绳肌复合体损伤修复术后早期重返运动的预测因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(4):1005-1013. doi: 10.1177/03635465231225486. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
5
Outcomes following surgical management of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions : a systematic review and meta-analysis.腘绳肌近端肌腱撕脱伤手术治疗的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Bone Jt Open. 2022 May;3(5):415-422. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.35.BJO-2021-0196.R1.
6
A systematic review of surgical intervention in the treatment of hamstring tendon ruptures: current evidence on the impact on patient outcomes.系统回顾手术干预治疗腘绳肌腱断裂:当前关于对患者结局影响的证据。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):978-988. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2059560.
7
Proximal hamstring tendon avulsions: comparable clinical outcomes of operative and non-operative treatment at 1-year follow-up using a shared decision-making model.近端腘绳肌腱撕脱伤:采用共享决策模型,手术与非手术治疗 1 年随访的临床结果相当。
Br J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;56(6):340-348. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104588. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
8
The surgical repair of proximal hamstring avulsions.近端腘绳肌腱撕脱的手术修复。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Oct;102-B(10):1419-1427. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B10.BJJ-2019-1112.R1.
9
Return to Sport After Proximal Hamstring Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review.腘绳肌近端肌腱修复术后恢复运动:一项系统评价
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jun 24;7(6):2325967119853218. doi: 10.1177/2325967119853218. eCollection 2019 Jun.
10
A Comparison of Nonoperative and Operative Treatment of Complete Proximal Hamstring Ruptures.完全性近端腘绳肌断裂的非手术与手术治疗比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Nov 17;5(11):2325967117738551. doi: 10.1177/2325967117738551. eCollection 2017 Nov.