• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于一期屈指肌腱修复术后早期主动活动的新型奇数股缝线技术的生物力学分析

Biomechanical Analysis of a New Odd-Numbered Strand Suture Technique for Early Active Mobilization After Primary Flexor Tendon Repair.

作者信息

Moriya Koji, Maki Yutaka, Koda Hisao, Kuroda Takuma, Tsubokawa Naoto

机构信息

Niigata Hand Surgery Foundation, Niigata, Japan.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Mar 25;6(4):488-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.02.013. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.02.013
PMID:39166191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11331162/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The placement of multistrand sutures during flexor tendon repair is complex and challenging. We developed a new, simpler, nine-strand suture, which we term the Tajima nines. The Tajima nines repair method is a new odd-numbered strand tendon technique.

METHODS

Fourteen porcine flexor tendons were transected and repaired using the Tajima nines repair method, without placement of peripheral sutures. This technique is a modification of the Lim and Tsai repair method; it uses a 4-0 monofilament nylon, 3-strand line, and two needles. The repaired tendons were tested for linear, noncyclic, load-to-failure tensile strength. The initial gap, 2-mm gap-formation force, and ultimate strength were measured.

RESULTS

The initial gap-formation force was 27.9 ± 7.5 newtons (N), the 2-mm gap-formation force was 39.2 ± 4.7 N, and the ultimate strength was 76.7 ± 17.2 N. Eight, three, and three of the 14 tendons repaired using the Tajima nines method demonstrated failure because of thread breakage, knot failure, and suture pull-out, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This biomechanical study demonstrated that Tajima nines repair was associated with particularly high initial tension at the repair site; there were minor variations in the initial load and 2-mm gap-formation load. Our results suggest that Tajima nines repair with peripheral suturing allows the repaired flexor tendon to tolerate the stresses encountered during early active mobilization.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This simple nine-strand technique will be particularly useful for inexperienced surgeons who perform early active mobilization after primary flexor tendon repair because the technique is a modification of the Lim and Tsai repair method using a triple strand instead of a double strand.

摘要

目的

在屈肌腱修复过程中放置多股缝线复杂且具有挑战性。我们开发了一种新的、更简单的九股缝线,我们称之为田岛九股缝线。田岛九股缝线修复方法是一种新的奇数股肌腱技术。

方法

14条猪屈肌腱被切断并采用田岛九股缝线修复方法进行修复,未放置周边缝线。该技术是对林和蔡修复方法的改良;它使用4-0单丝尼龙线、三股线和两根针。对修复后的肌腱进行线性、非循环、至断裂负荷的拉伸强度测试。测量初始间隙、2毫米间隙形成力和极限强度。

结果

初始间隙形成力为27.9±7.5牛顿(N),2毫米间隙形成力为39.2±4.7 N,极限强度为76.7±17.2 N。采用田岛九股缝线方法修复的14条肌腱中,分别有8条、3条和3条因缝线断裂、结失败和缝线拔出而出现失败。

结论

这项生物力学研究表明,田岛九股缝线修复与修复部位特别高的初始张力相关;初始负荷和2毫米间隙形成负荷存在微小差异。我们的结果表明,采用周边缝合的田岛九股缝线修复能使修复后的屈肌腱耐受早期主动活动期间遇到的应力。

临床意义

这种简单的九股技术对于在一期屈肌腱修复后进行早期主动活动的经验不足的外科医生将特别有用,因为该技术是对林和蔡修复方法的改良,使用三股线而非两股线。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff02/11331162/28336eae9be0/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff02/11331162/f8662a362ec9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff02/11331162/ba99cf0d31e2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff02/11331162/d960b12b811e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff02/11331162/28336eae9be0/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff02/11331162/f8662a362ec9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff02/11331162/ba99cf0d31e2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff02/11331162/d960b12b811e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff02/11331162/28336eae9be0/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Biomechanical Analysis of a New Odd-Numbered Strand Suture Technique for Early Active Mobilization After Primary Flexor Tendon Repair.一种用于一期屈指肌腱修复术后早期主动活动的新型奇数股缝线技术的生物力学分析
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024 Mar 25;6(4):488-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.02.013. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Biomechanical Analysis of a New Eight-Strand Suture for Flexor Tendon Repair.一种新型八股缝线用于屈肌腱修复的生物力学分析
Indian J Plast Surg. 2022 Sep 25;55(3):294-298. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756132. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Comparison of Flexor Tendon Repair Between 6-Strand Lim-Tsai With 4-Strand Cruciate and Becker Technique.6股Lim-Tsai法与4股十字交叉法及Becker法修复屈指肌腱的比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Sep;40(9):1806-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
4
Comparison of Flexor Tendon Suture Techniques Including 1 Using 10 Strands.屈肌腱缝合技术的比较,包括一种使用10股线的技术。
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Jul;40(7):1369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.03.021. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
5
Biomechanical analysis of a new 8-strand technique for flexor tendon repair.一种新型 8 股肌腱修复技术的生物力学分析。
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2020 Oct;39(5):442-447. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 May 23.
6
The consistency and reliability of six-strand and four-strand flexor tendon repairs: a comparative porcine cadaveric study.六股和四股屈肌腱修复的一致性和可靠性:一项对比性猪尸体研究。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2022 May;47(5):501-506. doi: 10.1177/17531934211066556. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
7
Asymmetric 6-Strand Flexor Tendon Repair - Biomechanical Analysis Using Barbed Suture.不对称6股屈肌腱修复——使用倒刺缝线的生物力学分析
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2019 Sep;24(3):297-302. doi: 10.1142/S2424835519500371.
8
A biomechanical comparison of 3 loop suture materials in a 6-strand flexor tendon repair technique.在六股屈肌腱修复技术中三种环形缝合材料的生物力学比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Sep;37(9):1830-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
9
A Biomechanical Study of a Novel Asymmetric 6-Strand Flexor Tendon Repair Using Porcine Tendons.一项使用猪肌腱的新型不对称6股屈肌腱修复的生物力学研究。
Hand (N Y). 2018 Jan;13(1):50-55. doi: 10.1177/1558944716685829. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
10
A Biomechanical Comparison of Gliding Resistance between Modified Lim Tsai and Asymmetric Tendon Repair Techniques in Zone II Flexor Tendon Repairs.改良 Lim Tsai 与非对称肌腱修复技术在 II 区屈肌腱修复中滑行阻力的生物力学比较。
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2022 Jun;27(3):499-505. doi: 10.1142/S2424835522500515. Epub 2022 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
In vitro testing of flexor tendon repair models: variability in the current literature.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2023 Feb;48(2):162-168. doi: 10.1177/17531934221139068. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
2
The Effects of the TSOL Knot on the Repair Strength and Gliding Resistance Following Flexor Tendon Repair.TSOL 结对屈肌腱修复后修复强度和滑动阻力的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Nov 16;104(22):2000-2007. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01538. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
3
A 3-Dimensional Suture Technique for Flexor Tendon Repair: A Biomechanical Study.三维缝合技术修复屈肌腱:一项生物力学研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Feb;48(2):194.e1-194.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.09.030. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
4
Flexor Tendon Injuries.屈肌腱损伤。
Clin Plast Surg. 2019 Jul;46(3):295-306. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2019.02.003.
5
Biomechanical comparison of modified Lim/Tsai tendon repairs with intra- and extra-tendinous knots.改良Lim/Tsai肌腱修复术采用肌腱内和肌腱外打结的生物力学比较。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018 Nov;43(9):919-924. doi: 10.1177/1753193418769804. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
6
New Developments Are Improving Flexor Tendon Repair.新进展改善屈肌腱修复。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jun;141(6):1427-1437. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004416.
7
Cyclic Testing of the 6-Strand Tang and Modified Lim-Tsai Flexor Tendon Repair Techniques.6股Tang法和改良Lim-Tsai法屈肌腱修复技术的循环测试
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Mar;43(3):285.e1-285.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
8
Biomechanical comparison of the Lim/Tsai tendon repair with a modified method using a single looped suture.采用单环缝合法改良方法对Lim/Tsai肌腱修复进行生物力学比较。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017 Nov;42(9):915-919. doi: 10.1177/1753193417723273. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
9
Suture configurations and biomechanical properties of flexor tendon repairs by 16 hand surgeons in Finland.芬兰16位手外科医生进行屈指肌腱修复的缝合方式及生物力学特性
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016 Oct;41(8):831-7. doi: 10.1177/1753193416641624. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
10
Comparison of Flexor Tendon Suture Techniques Including 1 Using 10 Strands.屈肌腱缝合技术的比较,包括一种使用10股线的技术。
J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Jul;40(7):1369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.03.021. Epub 2015 Jun 3.