Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Key Laboratory of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai 200063, China.
Key Laboratory of Microecology-immune Regulatory Network and Related Diseases, School of Basic Medicine, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 154000, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Jun 25;40(3):237-244. doi: 10.12116/j.issn.1004-5619.2023.230501.
To explore the effects of different test positions on quantitative muscle strength of wrist and finger flexor muscle groups and to establish a standardized muscle strength test protocol for each muscle group.
Forty healthy subjects (12 males and 28 females) were recruited. A portable digital quantitative muscle strength tester, Micro FET2, was used to measure the flexor muscle strength of each finger and the wrist joint at the 30° extension, 0° neutral, and 30° flexion, respectively. Palmar abduction strength of the thumb was measured at 30° and 60°, respectively. Ten subjects were randomly selected from the 40 subjects, and the quantitative muscle strength of each muscle group was tested again by the same operator after an interval of 10 to 15 days.
Except for the fact that in males, there was no significant difference in flexor muscle strength of thumb and wrist joint between 30° of wrist extension and neutral 0° position, the muscle strength of the other fingers flexion and wrist palmar flexor showed the following characteristics:30° of wrist extension > neutral 0° position > 30° of flexion, and the PAST was 30°>60°; The flexor muscle strength of all the subjects was thumb > index finger > middle finger > ring finger > little finger; All muscle strength values of male were greater than those of female, and the difference was statistically significant (<0.05); There was no significant difference between the left and right side muscle strength values of all subjects (>0.05). The reliability of muscle strength values measured at different times in 10 subjects was good.
The quantitative muscle strength of each muscle group of the hand and wrist is affected by the test position, and a standardized and uniformed test position should be adopted in the actual identification. Micro FET2 has good reliability for hand and wrist quantitative muscle strength testing. The 30° extension of the wrist can be used as the best standardized test position for the flexion muscle strength of each finger and wrist joint. The 30° position can be used as the best standardized test position for PAST.
探讨不同测试体位对腕关节和手指屈肌肌群定量肌力的影响,为各肌群建立标准化的肌力测试方案。
共纳入 40 名健康受试者(男 12 名,女 28 名)。采用便携式数字定量肌力测试仪 MicroFET2,分别测量各手指及腕关节在 30°伸展位、0°中立位和 30°屈曲位时的屈肌肌力,拇指掌侧外展肌力分别测量 30°和 60°。随机选择 40 名受试者中的 10 名,由同一名操作者在 10-15 天后再次测试各肌群的定量肌力。
除男性受试者在腕关节 30°伸展位与中立 0°位时拇指和腕关节屈肌肌力无显著性差异外,其余手指掌屈肌和腕掌屈肌肌力表现为:30°伸展位>中立 0°位>30°屈曲位,PAST 为 30°>60°;各手指屈肌肌力大小依次为拇指>示指>中指>环指>小指;男性各肌群肌力值均大于女性,差异有统计学意义(<0.05);所有受试者左右侧肌群肌力值比较,差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。10 名受试者不同时间点肌力值测量的可靠性良好。
手部和腕部各肌群的定量肌力受测试体位的影响,实际鉴定中应采用标准化、统一的测试体位。MicroFET2 用于手部和腕部定量肌力测试具有良好的可靠性。腕关节 30°伸展位可作为各手指及腕关节屈肌肌力的最佳标准化测试体位,30°位可作为 PAST 的最佳标准化测试体位。