• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1998-2021 年丹麦多次翻修膝关节置换术的发病率和生存率:一项基于全国登记的研究。

Incidence and survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties in Denmark 1998-2021: a nationwide register-based study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University.

出版信息

Acta Orthop. 2024 Aug 21;95:454-459. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41257.

DOI:10.2340/17453674.2024.41257
PMID:39167020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11337950/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The primary aim of our study was to identify the absolute incidence and implant survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties based on nationwide register data. The secondary aim was to determine the change in the absolute incidence and implant survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study of primary knee arthroplasties using several nationwide Danish registers. All primary knee arthroplasties performed in Denmark from 1998 to 2021 were identified. From these primary arthroplasties, revision procedures were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots were used in survival analysis to estimate the likelihood of implant survival.

RESULTS

161,384 primary knee arthroplasties and their revisions performed between 1998 and 2021 were identified; of 13,786 (8.5%) revisions there were 10,638 1st revisions, 2,148 2nd revisions, 624 3rd revisions, 223 4th revisions, and 153 procedures that had been revised more than 4 times. The 10-year revision-free survival of primary arthroplasties was 92.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 92.2-92.5). First-time revisions had a 10-year revision-free survival of 75.9% (CI 74.9-76.9). The 10-year survival of second- and third-time revisions was 65.1% (CI 62.6-67.6) and 57.8% (CI 53.4-62.5), respectively. The 10-year implant survival probabilities of primary knee arthroplasties were 91.4% in 1998-2009 and 93.3% in 2010-2021 (difference 2.2%). The 10-year implant survival probabilities of 1st revisions were 77% in 1998-2009 and 75% in 2010-2021 (difference -2.4%).

CONCLUSION

We found that 0.3% of all primary knee arthroplasties resulted in 3 or more revisions. The implant survival decreased for each consecutive revision, with almost half of the 3rd revisions being re-revised within 10 years. The 10-survival of the primary implant was higher in 2010-2021, and the 10-year survival of the 1st revision was higher in 1998-2009.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是基于全国登记数据,确定多次翻修膝关节置换术的绝对发病率和植入物存活率。次要目的是确定多次翻修膝关节置换术的绝对发病率和植入物存活率的变化。

方法

我们使用几个丹麦全国性登记处对原发性膝关节置换术进行了回顾性观察性研究。从 1998 年至 2021 年在丹麦进行的所有原发性膝关节置换术均被确定。从这些原发性关节置换术中,确定了翻修手术。生存分析中使用 Kaplan-Meier 图估计植入物存活率。

结果

在 1998 年至 2021 年间,确定了 161384 例原发性膝关节置换术及其翻修术;在 13786 例(8.5%)翻修术中有 10638 例为初次翻修术,2148 例为第二次翻修术,624 例为第三次翻修术,223 例为第四次翻修术,153 例翻修次数超过 4 次。原发性关节置换术的 10 年无翻修存活率为 92.3%(95%置信区间[CI]92.2-92.5)。初次翻修术的 10 年无翻修存活率为 75.9%(CI 74.9-76.9)。第二次和第三次翻修术的 10 年生存率分别为 65.1%(CI 62.6-67.6)和 57.8%(CI 53.4-62.5)。1998-2009 年原发性膝关节置换术的 10 年植入物存活率为 91.4%,2010-2021 年为 93.3%(差异为 2.2%)。1998-2009 年初次翻修术的 10 年植入物存活率为 77%,2010-2021 年为 75%(差异为-2.4%)。

结论

我们发现,0.3%的原发性膝关节置换术需要进行 3 次或更多次翻修。每次连续翻修后,植入物存活率都会下降,近一半的第三次翻修术在 10 年内再次翻修。2010-2021 年原发性植入物的 10 年生存率较高,1998-2009 年初次翻修的 10 年生存率较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da8/11337950/7d320a15da1a/ActaO-95-41257-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da8/11337950/c9b43598d87a/ActaO-95-41257-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da8/11337950/5aebfea7a3b6/ActaO-95-41257-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da8/11337950/7d320a15da1a/ActaO-95-41257-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da8/11337950/c9b43598d87a/ActaO-95-41257-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da8/11337950/5aebfea7a3b6/ActaO-95-41257-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4da8/11337950/7d320a15da1a/ActaO-95-41257-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Incidence and survival of multiply revised knee arthroplasties in Denmark 1998-2021: a nationwide register-based study.1998-2021 年丹麦多次翻修膝关节置换术的发病率和生存率:一项基于全国登记的研究。
Acta Orthop. 2024 Aug 21;95:454-459. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41257.
2
Prosthesis survival after revision knee arthroplasty for "pain without loosening" versus "aseptic loosening": a Danish nationwide study.翻修膝关节置换术后“无松动性疼痛”与“无菌性松动”的假体生存率:一项丹麦全国性研究。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Jan 3;93:103-110. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1999069.
3
Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement.不明原因的单髁和全膝关节置换术后疼痛的翻修。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 5;94(17):e126. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00791.
4
Failure of aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties.无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术失败。
Acta Orthop. 2015 Feb;86(1):48-57. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.964097. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
5
Revision total knee arthroplasty in the young patient: is there trouble on the horizon?年轻患者的全膝关节翻修术:未来是否会有麻烦?
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):536-42. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00131.
6
Revision surgery for patellofemoral problems: should we always resurface?髌股问题的翻修手术:我们是否应该总是重新表面化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):211-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2036-2.
7
Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: an analysis of 1,037 revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.55 岁以下患者髋关节翻修术的结果:荷兰关节置换登记处 1037 例翻修分析。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Apr;91(2):165-170. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1708655. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
8
Weight affects survival of primary total knee arthroplasty: study based on the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register with 67,810 patients and a median follow-up time of 5 years.体重影响初次全膝关节置换术的存活率:基于丹麦膝关节置换登记处的研究,共纳入 67810 例患者,中位随访时间为 5 年。
Acta Orthop. 2019 Feb;90(1):60-66. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1540091. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
9
Can Machine-learning Algorithms Predict Early Revision TKA in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry?机器学习算法能否预测丹麦膝关节置换登记处的早期翻修 TKA?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2088-2101. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001343.
10
Unicondylar knee arthroplasty demonstrating a significant increased risk for aseptic revisions compared to unconstrained and constrained total knee arthroplasty: An analysis of aseptic revisions after unicondylar and primary total knee arthroplasty of the German Arthroplasty Registry.单髁膝关节置换术与非约束性和约束性全膝关节置换术相比,无菌翻修的风险显著增加:德国关节置换登记处的单髁和初次全膝关节置换术后无菌翻修分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Jul;32(7):1775-1784. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12192. Epub 2024 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The downstream risk of multiple revisions following a prior TKA revision due to infection is higher compared to an aseptic TKA revision: A nationwide register study.与无菌性全膝关节置换术(TKA)翻修相比,因感染进行过一次TKA翻修后多次翻修的下游风险更高:一项全国性登记研究。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Apr 18;12(2):e70246. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70246. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for a structured manuscript: Statistical methods and reporting in biomedical research journals.结构化稿件指南:生物医学研究期刊中的统计方法与报告
Acta Orthop. 2023 May 10;94:243-249. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.11656.
2
What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.初次全髋关节置换术治疗骨关节炎的翻修结果如何?来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1952-1970. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002339. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
3
How long do revised and multiply revised knee replacements last? An analysis of the National Joint Registry.
翻修及多次翻修的膝关节置换术能维持多久?一项基于国家关节注册中心的分析。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2021 Jun;3(6):e438-e446. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00079-5. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
4
Prosthesis survival after revision knee arthroplasty for "pain without loosening" versus "aseptic loosening": a Danish nationwide study.翻修膝关节置换术后“无松动性疼痛”与“无菌性松动”的假体生存率:一项丹麦全国性研究。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Jan 3;93:103-110. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1999069.
5
Effect Modifiers and Statistical Tests for Interaction in Randomized Trials.随机试验中交互作用的效应修饰符和统计检验。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:174-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.009.
6
Reasons for revision are associated with rerevised total knee arthroplasties: an analysis of 8,978 index revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.翻修原因与再次全膝关节置换术有关:荷兰关节置换登记处 8978 例指数翻修的分析。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Oct;92(5):597-601. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1925036. Epub 2021 May 14.
7
Factors predicting repeat revision and outcome after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: results from the New Zealand Joint Registry.无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术后再次翻修及预后的预测因素:来自新西兰关节注册中心的结果
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Feb;29(2):579-585. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-05985-8. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
8
The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records.丹麦医疗保健系统与流行病学研究:从医疗保健接触到数据库记录。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 12;11:563-591. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S179083. eCollection 2019.
9
Outcome of Revision Surgery for Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results of 3 Surgical Strategies.全膝关节置换术后感染翻修手术的结果:三种手术策略的结果
JBJS Rev. 2019 Jun;7(6):e4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00084.
10
The STROBE guidelines.STROBE指南。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;13(Suppl 1):S31-S34. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_543_18.