Suppr超能文献

SHIMP范式的抗代偿性扫视模式能够区分前庭性偏头痛患者与健康个体。

The patterns of anti-compensatory saccades of the SHIMP paradigm can differentiate vestibular migraine from healthy individuals.

作者信息

Sanitha Adithya Sreedharan, Nagarajan Aishwarya, Sinha Sujeet Kumar

机构信息

Department of Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Manasagangothri, Mysore, India.

Department of Audiology, Center of Excellence for Persons With Tinnitus and Vestibular Disorders, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Manasagangothri, Mysore, India.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jan;282(1):137-144. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08916-2. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to characterize the HIMP and SHIMP test findings in individuals with vestibular migraine.

METHOD

The study comprised two groups- group I consisted of twenty five adults diagnosed with Vestibular migraine, and group II comprised twenty-five age matched healthy individuals. HIMP & SHIMP were administered using the ICS impulse system for both groups.

RESULTS

Mann-Whitney U test revealed a significant difference (p< 0.05) in VOR gain and VOR suppression gain between the vestibular migraine and healthy individuals. All the subjects in the vestibular migraine group manifested either of the four patterns of anti-compensatory saccades (ACS): (a) bilaterally absent ACS, (b) bilaterally scattered ACS or (c) typical ACS on one side with scattered ACS on the other side (d) unilaterally absent ACS. On the other hand, all the healthy individuals exhibited the presence of an organised ACS bilaterally.

CONCLUSION

VOR pathway is affected in individuals with vestibular migraine. Also, various patterns of ACS are more effective in identifying the subtle vestibular lesion in vestibular migraine. These patterns are useful in differentiating vestibular migraine from healthy individuals.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述前庭性偏头痛患者的冷热试验(HIMP)和主观水平半规管试验(SHIMP)结果。

方法

本研究包括两组——第一组由25名被诊断为前庭性偏头痛的成年人组成,第二组由25名年龄匹配的健康个体组成。两组均使用ICS脉冲系统进行冷热试验和主观水平半规管试验。

结果

曼-惠特尼U检验显示,前庭性偏头痛患者与健康个体之间的视动性眼震增益(VOR增益)和视动性眼震抑制增益存在显著差异(p<0.05)。前庭性偏头痛组的所有受试者均表现出四种反代偿性扫视(ACS)模式中的一种:(a)双侧无ACS,(b)双侧散在ACS,或(c)一侧典型ACS伴另一侧散在ACS,(d)单侧无ACS。另一方面,所有健康个体双侧均表现出有组织的ACS。

结论

前庭性偏头痛患者的视动性眼震通路受到影响。此外,各种ACS模式在识别前庭性偏头痛的细微前庭病变方面更有效。这些模式有助于将前庭性偏头痛与健康个体区分开来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验