Carbon dioxide angiography during angioembolization for trauma patients increases the detection of active bleeding and leads to reliable hemostasis: a retrospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND

Angiography with carbon dioxide (CO) has long been used as an alternative when iodine contrast media (ICM) cannot be used due to allergy to iodine or renal dysfunction. Conversely, CO angiography is also known as a provocation method for active bleeding. In this study, we examined the efficacy of CO angiography in angioembolization (AE) for trauma patients.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study of trauma patients who underwent AE at our facility between January 2012 and April 2023.

RESULTS

Within this period, 335 AEs were performed. CO angiography was performed in 102 patients (30.4%), and in 113 procedures. COangiography was used to provoke active bleeding which went undetected using ICM in 83 procedures, and to confirm hemostasis after embolization in 30 procedures. Of the 80 procedures wherein, active bleeding was not detected on ICM, 35 procedures (43.8%) were detected using CO. The spleen had the highest detection rate of active bleeding by CO angiography among the organs. There were 4/102 (1.9%) patients with CO contrast who underwent some form of reintervention. Two patients were re-embolized with n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate because of recanalization after embolization with gelatin sponge. The other two patients had pseudoaneurysm formation which required reintervention, and CO angiography was not used. Vomiting was the most common complication of CO angiography in 10 patients (9.8%), whereas all were transient and did not require treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

CO angiography of trauma patients may have a better detection rate of active bleeding compared with ICM, leading to reliable hemostasis.