• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电动牙刷 Oral-B iO™ 与传统的摆动-旋转技术相比的清洁效果：一项随机对照研究。

Cleansing efficacy of the electric toothbrush Oral-B iO™ compared to conventional oscillating-rotating technology: a randomized-controlled study.

机构信息

University Hospital for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, Innsbruck, 6020, Austria.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 21;28(9):493. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05882-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-024-05882-1
PMID:39167335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11339098/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the cleansing efficacy of the Oral-B iO™ electric toothbrush incorporating oscillating-rotating technology with microvibrations - with a traditional oscillating-rotating toothbrush.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty adult participants were randomly assigned to use the iO™ electric toothbrush with the brush head iO™ Ultimate Clean or the traditional oscillating-rotating toothbrush Oral-B Genius with the Cross-Action brush head. Oral hygiene indices (Rustogi Modified Navy Plaque Index and Gingival Bleeding Index) were assessed before and after 28 days of home use of the assigned product. Participants were instructed to refrain from interdental hygiene during the study period. After a 2-week washout period, the clinical investigation was repeated in a crossover design.

RESULTS

All 30 participants completed the study with no dropouts. After 28 days of use, the iO™ showed statistically significantly lower plaque levels than the conventional oscillating-rotating toothbrush (25.09% vs. 30.60%, p = 0.029). This difference was particularly noticeable in marginal and approximal areas. There were no significant distinctions in gingival bleeding indices.

CONCLUSIONS

The Oral-B iO™ electric toothbrush displayed enhanced plaque removal efficiency compared to a conventional oscillating-rotating technology.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study highlights the potential benefits of advanced toothbrush technologies for plaque reduction and encourages further research.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较采用微振动的Oral-B iO™电动牙刷（结合了往复旋转技术）与传统的往复旋转电动牙刷的清洁效果。

材料和方法

30 名成年参与者被随机分配使用 iO™电动牙刷搭配 iO™ Ultimate Clean 刷头或传统的 Oral-B Genius 电动牙刷搭配 Cross-Action 刷头。在使用指定产品 28 天后，分别评估口腔卫生指数（改良海军 Rustogi 菌斑指数和牙龈出血指数）。研究期间，参与者被要求避免使用牙间清洁产品。经过 2 周的洗脱期后，以交叉设计重复进行临床研究。

结果

所有 30 名参与者均完成了研究，无脱落者。使用 28 天后，iO™电动牙刷的菌斑水平明显低于传统的往复旋转电动牙刷（25.09% vs. 30.60%，p=0.029）。在边缘和邻面区域，这种差异尤其明显。牙龈出血指数无显著差异。

结论

与传统的往复旋转技术相比，Oral-B iO™电动牙刷具有更好的菌斑去除效果。

临床意义

本研究强调了先进的牙刷技术在减少菌斑方面的潜在益处，并鼓励进一步的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/734e/11339098/35af3ccfa72c/784_2024_5882_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/734e/11339098/d9e0c323dceb/784_2024_5882_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/734e/11339098/44463ef23283/784_2024_5882_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/734e/11339098/35af3ccfa72c/784_2024_5882_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/734e/11339098/d9e0c323dceb/784_2024_5882_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/734e/11339098/44463ef23283/784_2024_5882_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/734e/11339098/35af3ccfa72c/784_2024_5882_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cleansing efficacy of the electric toothbrush Oral-B iO™ compared to conventional oscillating-rotating technology: a randomized-controlled study.电动牙刷 Oral-B iO™ 与传统的摆动-旋转技术相比的清洁效果：一项随机对照研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 21;28(9):493. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05882-1.
2
A six-week clinical evaluation of the plaque and gingivitis efficacy of an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush with a novel brush head utilizing angled CrissCross bristles versus a sonic toothbrush.一项为期六周的临床评估，比较一款采用新型刷头、带有成角度交叉刷毛的旋转振荡电动牙刷与一款声波牙刷在清除牙菌斑和治疗牙龈炎方面的功效。
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(2):6-12.
3
An 8-Week Clinical Comparison of an Oscillating-Rotating Electric Rechargeable Toothbrush and a Sonic Toothbrush in the Reduction of Gingivitis and Plaque.一款旋转振荡式电动充电牙刷与一款声波牙刷在减轻牙龈炎和牙菌斑方面的8周临床比较
J Clin Dent. 2018 Mar;29(1):27-32.
4
A 12-week clinical comparison of an oscillating-rotating power brush versus a marketed sonic brush with self-adjusting technology in reducing plaque and gingivitis.一项为期12周的临床比较：振荡旋转电动牙刷与一款具有自动调节技术的市售声波牙刷在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的效果。
J Clin Dent. 2013;24(2):55-61.
5
Clinical evaluations of plaque removal efficacy: an advanced rotating-oscillating power toothbrush versus a sonic toothbrush.牙菌斑清除效果的临床评估：一款先进的旋转振荡式电动牙刷与一款声波牙刷的对比
J Clin Dent. 2007;18(4):106-11.
6
An Eight-Week Clinical Evaluation of an Oscillating-Rotating Power Toothbrush with a Brush Head Utilizing Angled Bristles Compared with a Sonic Toothbrush in the Reduction of Gingivitis and Plaque.一项为期八周的临床评估：比较一款带有成角刷毛刷头的振荡旋转电动牙刷与一款声波牙刷在减轻牙龈炎和牙菌斑方面的效果。
J Clin Dent. 2015;26(3):80-5.
7
Gingival health effects with an oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush with micro-vibrations and a novel brush head designed for stain control: Results from a 12-week randomized controlled trial.一款带有微振动功能的旋转式电动牙刷及一款专为控制牙菌斑设计的新型刷头对牙龈健康的影响：一项为期12周的随机对照试验结果
Am J Dent. 2022 Oct;35(5):219-226.
8
A randomized controlled trial evaluating a novel oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush versus a sonic toothbrush for plaque and gingivitis.一项评估新型振荡旋转电动牙刷与声波牙刷对牙菌斑和牙龈炎影响的随机对照试验。
Am J Dent. 2025 Feb;38(1):3-8.
9
A randomized 12-week clinical comparison of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush to a new sonic brush in the reduction of gingivitis and plaque.一项为期12周的随机临床对照试验，比较一款旋转振动牙刷与一款新型声波牙刷在减轻牙龈炎和牙菌斑方面的效果。
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(2):26-31.
10
Cleansing efficacy of an auto-cleaning device versus an oscillating- rotating toothbrush in home use. A pilot study in individuals with down syndrome.家用自动清洁装置与旋转振动牙刷的清洁效果对比：一项针对唐氏综合征患者的初步研究
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Feb 10;29(2):126. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06203-w.

引用本文的文献

1
A Randomized Crossover Trial Assessing Plaque Regrowth Dynamics in Adults With Use of an Oscillating-Rotating Electric Toothbrush Versus a Manual Toothbrush Measured by Digital Plaque Image Analysis.一项随机交叉试验，通过数字菌斑图像分析评估使用振荡旋转电动牙刷与手动牙刷的成年人的菌斑再生长动态。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Jun;11(3):e70158. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70158.

本文引用的文献

1
A 6-month randomized controlled trial evaluating a novel smart-connected oscillating-rotating toothbrush versus a smart-connected sonic toothbrush for the reduction of plaque and gingivitis.一项为期 6 个月的随机对照试验，评估了一款新型智能连接振荡旋转牙刷与智能连接声波牙刷在减少菌斑和牙龈炎方面的效果。
Am J Dent. 2021 Feb;34(1):54-60.
2
Plaque Removal by a Powered Toothbrush Versus a Manual Toothbrush in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电动牙刷与手动牙刷去除儿童牙菌斑的效果比较：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jul 15;42(4):280-287.
3
Evaluation of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush with micro-vibrations versus a sonic toothbrush for the reduction of plaque and gingivitis: results from a randomized controlled trial.
评价具有微振的振荡旋转牙刷与声波牙刷在减少菌斑和牙龈炎方面的效果：一项随机对照试验的结果。
Int Dent J. 2020 Apr;70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S16-S21. doi: 10.1111/idj.12569.
4
Introducing the Oral-B iO electric toothbrush: next generation oscillating-rotating technology.介绍 Oral-B iO 电动牙刷：新一代的摆动-旋转技术。
Int Dent J. 2020 Apr;70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-S6. doi: 10.1111/idj.12570.
5
Randomized controlled trial assessing plaque removal of an oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush with micro-vibrations.一项评估具有微振功能的往复旋转电动牙刷清除牙菌斑效果的随机对照试验。
Int Dent J. 2020 Apr;70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S22-S27. doi: 10.1111/idj.12568.
6
An 8-week randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of a novel oscillating-rotating toothbrush versus a manual toothbrush on plaque and gingivitis.一项为期 8 周的随机对照试验比较了新型振荡旋转牙刷与手动牙刷对菌斑和牙龈炎的影响。
Int Dent J. 2020 Apr;70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7-S15. doi: 10.1111/idj.12571.
7
How effective is a powered toothbrush as compared to a manual toothbrush? A systematic review and meta-analysis of single brushing exercises.电动牙刷相对于手动牙刷的效果如何？单次刷牙的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2020 Feb;18(1):17-26. doi: 10.1111/idh.12401. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
8
High Plaque Levels after Thorough Toothbrushing: What Impedes Efficacy?彻底刷牙后牙菌斑水平仍高：是什么阻碍了刷牙效果？
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019 Apr;4(2):135-142. doi: 10.1177/2380084418813310. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
9
Toothbrushing: to the best of one's abilities is possibly not good enough.刷牙：尽最大努力可能还不够好。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0633-0.
10
The Use and Reporting of the Cross-Over Study Design in Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews: A Systematic Assessment.交叉研究设计在临床试验和系统评价中的应用与报告：一项系统评估
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0159014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159014. eCollection 2016.