• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

限制策略与常规护理治疗腹痛和胆囊结石患者的胆囊切除术:SECURE 随机临床试验的 5 年随访结果。

Restrictive Strategy vs Usual Care for Cholecystectomy in Patients With Abdominal Pain and Gallstones: 5-Year Follow-Up of the SECURE Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2024 Nov 1;159(11):1235-1243. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3080.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3080
PMID:39167382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11339699/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The 1-year results of the SECURE trial, a randomized trial comparing a restrictive strategy vs usual care for select patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis for cholecystectomy, resulted in a significantly lower operation rate after restrictive strategy. However, a restrictive strategy did not result in more pain-free patients at 1 year.

OBJECTIVE

To gauge pain level and determine the proportion of pain-free patients, operation rate, and biliary and surgical complications at the 5-year follow-up.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial was a multicenter, parallel-arm, noninferiority, prospective study. Between February 2014 and April 2017, patients from 24 hospitals with symptomatic, uncomplicated cholelithiasis were included. Uncomplicated cholelithiasis was defined as gallstone disease without signs of complicated cholelithiasis, ie, biliary pancreatitis, cholangitis, common bile duct stones, or cholecystitis. Follow-up data for this analysis were collected by telephone from July 11, 2019, to September 23, 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive usual care or a restrictive strategy with stepwise selection for cholecystectomy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary, noninferiority end point was proportion of patients who were pain free as evaluated by Izbicki pain score at the 5-year follow-up. A 5% noninferiority margin was chosen. The secondary end points included cholecystectomy rates, biliary and surgical complications, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Among 1067 patients, the median (IQR) age was 49.0 years (38.0-59.0 years); 786 (73.7%) were female, and 281 (26.3%) were male. At the 5-year follow-up, 228 of 363 patients (62.8%) were pain free in the usual care group, compared with 216 of 353 patients (61.2%) in restrictive strategy group (difference, 1.6%; 1-sided 95% lower confidence limit, -7.6%; noninferiority P = .18). After cholecystectomy, 187 of 294 patients (63.6%) in the usual care group and 160 of 254 patients (63.0%) in the restrictive strategy group were pain free, respectively (P = .88). The restrictive care strategy was associated with 387 of 529 cholecystectomies (73.2%) compared with 437 of 536 in the usual care group (81.5%; 8.3% difference; P = .001). No differences between groups were observed in biliary and surgical complications or in patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In the long-term, a restrictive strategy results in a significant but small reduction in operation rate compared with usual care and is not associated with increased biliary and surgical complications. However, regardless of the strategy, only two-third of patients were pain free. Further criteria for selecting patients with uncomplicated cholelithiasis for cholecystectomy and rethinking laparoscopic cholecystectomy as treatment is needed to improve patient-reported outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CCMO Identifier: NTR4022.

摘要

重要性

SECURE 试验的 1 年结果显示,与常规治疗相比,对有症状的胆囊结石患者进行选择性胆囊切除术的限制策略导致手术后率显著降低。然而,限制策略并没有导致更多的患者在 1 年内没有疼痛。

目的

评估疼痛程度,并确定 5 年随访时无痛患者的比例、手术率、胆道和手术并发症。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项多中心、平行臂、非劣效性、前瞻性研究。2014 年 2 月至 2017 年 4 月,来自 24 家医院的有症状、无并发症的胆石症患者参与了该研究。无并发症的胆石症定义为没有复杂胆石症迹象的胆石病,即胰腺炎、胆管炎、胆总管结石或胆囊炎。本分析的随访数据于 2019 年 7 月 11 日至 2023 年 9 月 23 日通过电话收集。

干预措施

患者随机(1:1)接受常规护理或限制策略,逐步选择胆囊切除术。

主要结果和测量指标

主要的非劣效性终点是在 5 年随访时用 Izbicki 疼痛评分评估的无痛患者比例。选择了 5%的非劣效性边界。次要终点包括胆囊切除术率、胆道和手术并发症以及患者满意度。

结果

在 1067 名患者中,中位数(IQR)年龄为 49.0 岁(38.0-59.0 岁);786 名(73.7%)为女性,281 名(26.3%)为男性。在 5 年随访时,常规护理组 363 名患者中有 228 名(62.8%)无痛,限制策略组 353 名患者中有 216 名(61.2%)无痛(差异 1.6%;单侧 95%置信下限 -7.6%;非劣效性 P=0.18)。在胆囊切除术后,常规护理组 294 名患者中有 187 名(63.6%)无痛,限制策略组 254 名患者中有 160 名(63.0%)无痛(P=0.88)。限制护理策略与 529 例胆囊切除术相关,而常规护理组为 536 例(73.2%比 81.5%;8.3%差异;P=0.001)。两组在胆道和手术并发症或患者满意度方面均无差异。

结论和相关性

长期来看,与常规护理相比,限制策略会显著降低手术率,但与增加的胆道和手术并发症无关。然而,无论采用哪种策略,只有三分之二的患者没有疼痛。需要进一步制定选择有症状胆囊结石患者进行胆囊切除术的标准,并重新考虑腹腔镜胆囊切除术作为治疗方法,以改善患者报告的结果。

试验注册

CCMO 标识符:NTR4022。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9876/11339699/75bcc3046ab5/jamasurg-e243080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9876/11339699/75bcc3046ab5/jamasurg-e243080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9876/11339699/75bcc3046ab5/jamasurg-e243080-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Restrictive Strategy vs Usual Care for Cholecystectomy in Patients With Abdominal Pain and Gallstones: 5-Year Follow-Up of the SECURE Randomized Clinical Trial.限制策略与常规护理治疗腹痛和胆囊结石患者的胆囊切除术:SECURE 随机临床试验的 5 年随访结果。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Nov 1;159(11):1235-1243. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3080.
2
Restrictive strategy versus usual care for cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and abdominal pain (SECURE): a multicentre, randomised, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial.限制策略与常规护理治疗胆囊结石伴腹痛患者的胆囊切除术(SECURE):一项多中心、随机、平行臂、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 8;393(10188):2322-2330. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30941-9. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
3
A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol).一项比较限制性策略与常规治疗对有症状胆结石患者胆囊切除术有效性的随机对照试验(SECURE试验方案)。
BMC Surg. 2016 Jul 13;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0160-3.
4
A Clinical Decision Tool for Selection of Patients With Symptomatic Cholelithiasis for Cholecystectomy Based on Reduction of Pain and a Pain-Free State Following Surgery.基于手术缓解疼痛和实现无疼痛状态的选择症状性胆石症患者行胆囊切除术的临床决策工具。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):e213706. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3706. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
5
Statistical analysis plan of a randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy (SECURE trial).一项比较胆囊切除术限制性策略与常规护理有效性的随机对照试验的统计分析计划(SECURE试验)。
Trials. 2018 Nov 3;19(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2989-5.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Restrictive Strategy Versus Usual Care for Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Abdominal Pain (SECURE-trial).胆囊结石伴腹痛患者行胆囊切除术的限制策略与常规治疗的成本效果比较(SECURE-trial)。
Ann Surg. 2022 Aug 1;276(2):e93-e101. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004532. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与保守治疗成人单纯症状性胆囊结石的比较:C-GALL RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;28(26):1-151. doi: 10.3310/MNBY3104.
8
Budget Impact of Restrictive Strategy Versus Usual Care for Cholecystectomy (SECURE-Trial).胆囊切除术限制策略与常规治疗的预算影响(SECURE试验)
J Surg Res. 2021 Dec;268:59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.033. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
9
Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis.胆结石和胆囊炎。
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005;15(3):329-38. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v15.i3.90.
10
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy compared with observation/conservative management for preventing recurrent symptoms and complications in adults presenting with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.与观察/保守治疗相比,胆囊切除术对预防无并发症的有症状胆结石或胆囊炎成人患者复发症状和并发症的临床有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价和经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Aug;18(55):1-101, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta18550.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence of Gallstones in Patients with Obesity After Bariatric Surgery in Northern Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯北部肥胖患者减重手术后胆结石的发病率:一项横断面研究
Clin Pract. 2025 Jun 23;15(7):115. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15070115.
2
Clinical perspectives on post-cholecystectomy syndrome: a narrative review.胆囊切除术后综合征的临床观点:一项叙述性综述。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2496408. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2496408. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
3
Short disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis: Gall-Questionnaire.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of conservative management versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the prevention of recurrent symptoms and complications in adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease (C-GALL trial): pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial.保守治疗与腹腔镜胆囊切除术预防成人单纯症状性胆囊结石病(C-GALL 试验)复发症状和并发症的效果:实用、多中心随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2023 Dec 6;383:e075383. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075383.
2
A mixed-methods study to define Textbook Outcome for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstone disease with hospital variation analyses in Dutch trial data.一项混合方法研究,旨在通过荷兰试验数据中的医院变异分析,为治疗有症状的单纯性胆囊结石病患者的治疗效果确定教科书式结果。
HPB (Oxford). 2023 Sep;25(9):1000-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 15.
3
针对单纯症状性胆囊结石患者的简短疾病特异性生活质量问卷:胆囊问卷。
BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf025.
4
The association between life's essential 8 and gallstones: A cross-sectional study.生命必需的八项指标与胆结石之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 8;15(1):4713. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89024-x.
Postcholecystectomy diarrhoea rate and predictive factors: a systematic review of the literature.胆囊切除术后腹泻发生率及预测因素:文献系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 17;12(2):e046172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046172.
4
A Clinical Decision Tool for Selection of Patients With Symptomatic Cholelithiasis for Cholecystectomy Based on Reduction of Pain and a Pain-Free State Following Surgery.基于手术缓解疼痛和实现无疼痛状态的选择症状性胆石症患者行胆囊切除术的临床决策工具。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):e213706. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3706. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
5
Budget Impact of Restrictive Strategy Versus Usual Care for Cholecystectomy (SECURE-Trial).胆囊切除术限制策略与常规治疗的预算影响(SECURE试验)
J Surg Res. 2021 Dec;268:59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.033. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Restrictive Strategy Versus Usual Care for Cholecystectomy in Patients With Gallstones and Abdominal Pain (SECURE-trial).胆囊结石伴腹痛患者行胆囊切除术的限制策略与常规治疗的成本效果比较(SECURE-trial)。
Ann Surg. 2022 Aug 1;276(2):e93-e101. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004532. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Functional Dyspepsia and Irritable Bowel Syndrome are Highly Prevalent in Patients With Gallstones and Are Negatively Associated With Outcomes After Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study (PERFECT - Trial).功能性消化不良和肠易激综合征在胆石症患者中患病率很高,且与胆囊切除术后结局呈负相关:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究(PERFECT-试验)。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jun 1;275(6):e766-e772. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004453. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
8
Restrictive strategy versus usual care for cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and abdominal pain (SECURE): a multicentre, randomised, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial.限制策略与常规护理治疗胆囊结石伴腹痛患者的胆囊切除术(SECURE):一项多中心、随机、平行臂、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 8;393(10188):2322-2330. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30941-9. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
9
Statistical analysis plan of a randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy (SECURE trial).一项比较胆囊切除术限制性策略与常规护理有效性的随机对照试验的统计分析计划(SECURE试验)。
Trials. 2018 Nov 3;19(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2989-5.
10
A randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstones (SECURE trial protocol).一项比较限制性策略与常规治疗对有症状胆结石患者胆囊切除术有效性的随机对照试验(SECURE试验方案)。
BMC Surg. 2016 Jul 13;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0160-3.